Introduce hw_breakpoint_modify_local() as a generic helper to modify an
existing hardware breakpoint. The function invokes
hw_breakpoint_arch_parse() and delegates the reinstall step to the
architecture via arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint().
A weak default implementation of arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint() is
provided, returning -EOPNOTSUPP on architectures without support.
This makes the interface arch-independent while allowing x86 (and others)
to provide their own implementation.
Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h | 1 +
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
index db199d653dd1..9453b5bdb443 100644
--- a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ extern int
modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr,
bool check);
+int hw_breakpoint_modify_local(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr);
/*
* Kernel breakpoints are not associated with any particular thread.
*/
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
index 8ec2cb688903..ff428739f71e 100644
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -983,6 +983,24 @@ static void hw_breakpoint_del(struct perf_event *bp, int flags)
arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(bp);
}
+int hw_breakpoint_modify_local(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, attr, counter_arch_bp(bp));
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(bp);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(hw_breakpoint_modify_local);
+
+/* weak fallback for arches without support */
+__weak int arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
static void hw_breakpoint_start(struct perf_event *bp, int flags)
{
bp->hw.state = 0;
--
2.43.0
Hi Jinchao, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jinchao-Wang/mm-ksw-add-build-system-support/20250904-082544 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250904002126.1514566-7-wangjinchao600%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 06/18] perf/hw_breakpoint: add arch-independent hw_breakpoint_modify_local() config: sh-randconfig-001-20250905 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250906/202509060154.f5xlnJ2n-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250906/202509060154.f5xlnJ2n-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509060154.f5xlnJ2n-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'hw_breakpoint_modify_local': >> kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c:994:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint'; did you mean 'arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 994 | return arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(bp); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c: At top level: kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c:999:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 999 | __weak int arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +994 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c 985 986 int hw_breakpoint_modify_local(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr) 987 { 988 int err; 989 990 err = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, attr, counter_arch_bp(bp)); 991 if (err) 992 return err; 993 > 994 return arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(bp); 995 } 996 EXPORT_SYMBOL(hw_breakpoint_modify_local); 997 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Hi Jinchao, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jinchao-Wang/mm-ksw-add-build-system-support/20250904-082544 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250904002126.1514566-7-wangjinchao600%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 06/18] perf/hw_breakpoint: add arch-independent hw_breakpoint_modify_local() config: sh-randconfig-001-20250905 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250905/202509052351.KuHBWdAF-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250905/202509052351.KuHBWdAF-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509052351.KuHBWdAF-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'hw_breakpoint_modify_local': kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c:994:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint'; did you mean 'arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 994 | return arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(bp); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c: At top level: >> kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c:999:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 999 | __weak int arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint +999 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c 997 998 /* weak fallback for arches without support */ > 999 __weak int arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) 1000 { 1001 return -EOPNOTSUPP; 1002 } 1003 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 08:21:03AM +0800, Jinchao Wang wrote: > Introduce hw_breakpoint_modify_local() as a generic helper to modify an > existing hardware breakpoint. The function invokes > hw_breakpoint_arch_parse() and delegates the reinstall step to the > architecture via arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(). > > A weak default implementation of arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint() is > provided, returning -EOPNOTSUPP on architectures without support. > > This makes the interface arch-independent while allowing x86 (and others) > to provide their own implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com> > --- > include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h | 1 + > kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h > index db199d653dd1..9453b5bdb443 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h > +++ b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ extern int > modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr, > bool check); > > +int hw_breakpoint_modify_local(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr); > /* > * Kernel breakpoints are not associated with any particular thread. > */ > diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > index 8ec2cb688903..ff428739f71e 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > @@ -983,6 +983,24 @@ static void hw_breakpoint_del(struct perf_event *bp, int flags) > arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(bp); > } > > +int hw_breakpoint_modify_local(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr) > +{ > + int err; > + > + err = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, attr, counter_arch_bp(bp)); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + return arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(bp); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hw_breakpoint_modify_local); > + > +/* weak fallback for arches without support */ > +__weak int arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) > +{ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} Again, so much fail :/ So we have: {register,modify,unregister}_user_hw_breakpoint() and {register,unregister}_wide_hw_breakpoint() And you choose to extend this latter with hw_breakpoint_modify_local() instead of sticking with the naming scheme and say adding: modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local(). Also, again, that EXPORT is a fail, these other interfaces are all EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). Also note that modify_user_hw_breakpoint() doesn't seem to need new arch hooks. Yet you fail to explain why you think you do.
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 08:44:48AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 08:21:03AM +0800, Jinchao Wang wrote: > > Introduce hw_breakpoint_modify_local() as a generic helper to modify an > > existing hardware breakpoint. The function invokes > > hw_breakpoint_arch_parse() and delegates the reinstall step to the > > architecture via arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(). > > > > A weak default implementation of arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint() is > > provided, returning -EOPNOTSUPP on architectures without support. > > > > This makes the interface arch-independent while allowing x86 (and others) > > to provide their own implementation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com> > > --- > > include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h | 1 + > > kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h > > index db199d653dd1..9453b5bdb443 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h > > +++ b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h > > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ extern int > > modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr, > > bool check); > > > > +int hw_breakpoint_modify_local(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr); > > /* > > * Kernel breakpoints are not associated with any particular thread. > > */ > > diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > > index 8ec2cb688903..ff428739f71e 100644 > > --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > > +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > > @@ -983,6 +983,24 @@ static void hw_breakpoint_del(struct perf_event *bp, int flags) > > arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(bp); > > } > > > > +int hw_breakpoint_modify_local(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr) > > +{ > > + int err; > > + > > + err = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, attr, counter_arch_bp(bp)); > > + if (err) > > + return err; > > + > > + return arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(bp); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hw_breakpoint_modify_local); > > + > > +/* weak fallback for arches without support */ > > +__weak int arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) > > +{ > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > +} > > Again, so much fail :/ > > So we have: > > {register,modify,unregister}_user_hw_breakpoint() > > and > > {register,unregister}_wide_hw_breakpoint() > > And you choose to extend this latter with hw_breakpoint_modify_local() > instead of sticking with the naming scheme and say adding: > > modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local(). > > Also, again, that EXPORT is a fail, these other interfaces are all > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). > Thanks for your patience. I was misled by another family: - hw_breakpoint_add - hw_breakpoint_del - hw_breakpoint_start - hw_breakpoint_stop Since this logic was also added in the wprobe series by Masami, I will adopt his version instead. > Also note that modify_user_hw_breakpoint() doesn't seem to need new arch > hooks. Yet you fail to explain why you think you do. Thanks for feedback, I will study existing code to better handle the arch dependencies.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.