While 'if (i <= 0) ... else if (i > 0) ...' is technically equivalent to
'if (i <= 0) ... else ...', the latter is vastly easier to read because
it avoids writing out a condition that is unnecessary. Let's drop such
unnecessary conditions.

Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
index 22fe9e631f8a..693c59c8037a 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int mtk_ccifreq_set_voltage(struct mtk_ccifreq_drv *drv, int new_voltage)
 						      soc_data->sram_max_volt);
 				return ret;
 			}
-		} else if (pre_voltage > new_voltage) {
+		} else {
 			voltage = max(new_voltage,
 				      pre_vsram - soc_data->max_volt_shift);
 			ret = regulator_set_voltage(drv->proc_reg, voltage,
-- 
2.34.1

Hi,

Applied it.

Thanks.

On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 9:15 PM Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com> wrote:
>
> While 'if (i <= 0) ... else if (i > 0) ...' is technically equivalent to
> 'if (i <= 0) ... else ...', the latter is vastly easier to read because
> it avoids writing out a condition that is unnecessary. Let's drop such
> unnecessary conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> index 22fe9e631f8a..693c59c8037a 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int mtk_ccifreq_set_voltage(struct mtk_ccifreq_drv *drv, int new_voltage)
>                                                       soc_data->sram_max_volt);
>                                 return ret;
>                         }
> -               } else if (pre_voltage > new_voltage) {
> +               } else {
>                         voltage = max(new_voltage,
>                                       pre_vsram - soc_data->max_volt_shift);
>                         ret = regulator_set_voltage(drv->proc_reg, voltage,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

…
> it avoids writing out a condition that is unnecessary. Let's drop such

                                                         Thus?


> unnecessary conditions.

  an unnecessary condition?


Would a summary phrase like “Avoid redundant condition in mtk_ccifreq_set_voltage()”
be nicer?

Regards,
Markus