net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Mystery <m13940358460@163.com>
The original comment contained profanity to express the frustration of
dealing with a complex and resource-constrained code path. While the
sentiment is understandable, the language is unprofessional and
unnecessary.
Replace it with a more neutral and descriptive comment that maintains
the original technical context and conveys the difficulty of the
situation without the use of offensive language.
Indeed, I do not believe this will offend any particular individual or group.
Nonetheless, it is advisable to revise any commit that appears overly emotional or rude.
v5:
- Added this detailed changelog section
v4:https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250901060635.735038-1-m13940358460@163.com/
- Fixed incorrect Signed-off-by format (removed quotes) as requested by Andrew Lunn
- Consolidated multiple versions (v1/v2) into a single version history
v3:Due to some local reasons in my area, this is a lost version. I'm truly sorry
v2:https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250901055802.727743-1-m13940358460@163.com/
- Initial version addressing feedback
v1:https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250828084253.1719646-1-m13940358460@163.com/
- First submission
Signed-off-by: Mystery Li <m13940358460@163.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index ee0274417948..202c25a01f22 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -5333,7 +5333,7 @@ int skb_cow_data(struct sk_buff *skb, int tailbits, struct sk_buff **trailer)
skb_has_frag_list(skb1)) {
struct sk_buff *skb2;
- /* Fuck, we are miserable poor guys... */
+ /* This is a painfully difficult situation with limited resources... */
if (ntail == 0)
skb2 = skb_copy(skb1, GFP_ATOMIC);
else
--
2.25.1
On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 10:26 AM mysteryli <m13940358460@163.com> wrote: > > From: Mystery <m13940358460@163.com> > > The original comment contained profanity to express the frustration of > dealing with a complex and resource-constrained code path. While the > sentiment is understandable, the language is unprofessional and > unnecessary. > Replace it with a more neutral and descriptive comment that maintains > the original technical context and conveys the difficulty of the > situation without the use of offensive language. > Indeed, I do not believe this will offend any particular individual or group. > Nonetheless, it is advisable to revise any commit that appears overly emotional or rude. > > v5: > > - Added this detailed changelog section > > v4:https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250901060635.735038-1-m13940358460@163.com/ > - Fixed incorrect Signed-off-by format (removed quotes) as requested by Andrew Lunn > - Consolidated multiple versions (v1/v2) into a single version history > > v3:Due to some local reasons in my area, this is a lost version. I'm truly sorry > > v2:https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250901055802.727743-1-m13940358460@163.com/ > - Initial version addressing feedback > > v1:https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250828084253.1719646-1-m13940358460@163.com/ > - First submission > > Signed-off-by: Mystery Li <m13940358460@163.com> IIUC, you've received an explicit NACK from Jakub at the previous link https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250901114157.5345a56a@kernel.org/. Thanks, Jason
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.