The workload hint may contain some other hints which are not defined.
So mask out unsupported types. Currently only lower 4 bits of workload
type hints are defined.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
 .../selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c
index ba58589a1145..3ee018bca899 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		} else if (ret == 0) {
 			printf("Poll Timeout\n");
 		} else {
+
 			if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) {
 				fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set pointer to beginning\n");
 				exit(1);
@@ -144,6 +145,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 			ret = sscanf(index_str, "%d", &index);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				break;
+
+			index &= 0x0f;
 			if (index > WORKLOAD_TYPE_MAX_INDEX)
 				printf("Invalid workload type index\n");
 			else
-- 
2.50.1

On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:23 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> The workload hint may contain some other hints which are not defined.
> So mask out unsupported types. Currently only lower 4 bits of workload
> type hints are defined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c
> index ba58589a1145..3ee018bca899 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>                 } else if (ret == 0) {
>                         printf("Poll Timeout\n");
>                 } else {
> +

Is this change intentional?  Looks like it is not needed.

>                         if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) {
>                                 fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set pointer to beginning\n");
>                                 exit(1);
> @@ -144,6 +145,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>                         ret = sscanf(index_str, "%d", &index);
>                         if (ret < 0)
>                                 break;
> +
> +                       index &= 0x0f;
>                         if (index > WORKLOAD_TYPE_MAX_INDEX)
>                                 printf("Invalid workload type index\n");
>                         else
> --
> 2.50.1
>

On Thu, 2025-08-28 at 21:34 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:23 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
> <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The workload hint may contain some other hints which are not
> > defined.
> > So mask out unsupported types. Currently only lower 4 bits of
> > workload
> > type hints are defined.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada
> > <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c | 3
> > +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git
> > a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint
> > _test.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint
> > _test.c
> > index ba58589a1145..3ee018bca899 100644
> > ---
> > a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint
> > _test.c
> > +++
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint
> > _test.c
> > @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >                 } else if (ret == 0) {
> >                         printf("Poll Timeout\n");
> >                 } else {
> > +
> 
> Is this change intentional?  Looks like it is not needed.
Not intentional. Will send update.

Thanks,
Srinivas

> 
> >                         if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) {
> >                                 fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set
> > pointer to beginning\n");
> >                                 exit(1);
> > @@ -144,6 +145,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >                         ret = sscanf(index_str, "%d", &index);
> >                         if (ret < 0)
> >                                 break;
> > +
> > +                       index &= 0x0f;
> >                         if (index > WORKLOAD_TYPE_MAX_INDEX)
> >                                 printf("Invalid workload type
> > index\n");
> >                         else
> > --
> > 2.50.1
> > 
>