Instead of using qcom ELBI resources mapping let the DWC core map it
ELBI is DWC specific.
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
index 294babe1816e4d0c2b2343fe22d89af72afcd6cd..5092752de23866ef95036bb3f8fae9bb06e8ea1e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
@@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ struct qcom_pcie_port {
struct qcom_pcie {
struct dw_pcie *pci;
void __iomem *parf; /* DT parf */
- void __iomem *elbi; /* DT elbi */
void __iomem *mhi;
union qcom_pcie_resources res;
struct phy *phy;
@@ -414,12 +413,17 @@ static void qcom_pcie_configure_dbi_atu_base(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
static void qcom_pcie_2_1_0_ltssm_enable(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
{
+ struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
u32 val;
+ if (!pci->elbi_base) {
+ dev_err(pci->dev, "ELBI is not present\n");
+ return;
+ }
/* enable link training */
- val = readl(pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
+ val = readl(pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
val |= ELBI_SYS_CTRL_LT_ENABLE;
- writel(val, pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
+ writel(val, pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
}
static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
@@ -1861,12 +1865,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_pm_runtime_put;
}
- pcie->elbi = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "elbi");
- if (IS_ERR(pcie->elbi)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(pcie->elbi);
- goto err_pm_runtime_put;
- }
-
/* MHI region is optional */
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "mhi");
if (res) {
--
2.34.1
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 01:04:24PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> Instead of using qcom ELBI resources mapping let the DWC core map it
> ELBI is DWC specific.
This seems like basically the same change you (Mani) added to the
"[PATCH v8 2/5] PCI: dwc: Add support for ELBI resource mapping"
patch? (The patch with Mani's additions is at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=controller/dwc-ecam&id=d39e0103e38f9889271a77a837b6179b42d6730d)
If this qcom change is separated out, why can't the exynos and qcom-ep
changes from patch 2/5 be separated out? If we ever had to bisect
and/or revert parts of this, it seems like it would be simpler to do
them consistently like this:
- PCI: dwc: Add ELBI resource mapping
- PCI: exynos: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping
- PCI: qcom: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping
- PCI: qcom-ep: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 16 +++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 294babe1816e4d0c2b2343fe22d89af72afcd6cd..5092752de23866ef95036bb3f8fae9bb06e8ea1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ struct qcom_pcie_port {
> struct qcom_pcie {
> struct dw_pcie *pci;
> void __iomem *parf; /* DT parf */
> - void __iomem *elbi; /* DT elbi */
> void __iomem *mhi;
> union qcom_pcie_resources res;
> struct phy *phy;
> @@ -414,12 +413,17 @@ static void qcom_pcie_configure_dbi_atu_base(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>
> static void qcom_pcie_2_1_0_ltssm_enable(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> {
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> u32 val;
>
> + if (!pci->elbi_base) {
> + dev_err(pci->dev, "ELBI is not present\n");
> + return;
> + }
> /* enable link training */
> - val = readl(pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
> + val = readl(pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
> val |= ELBI_SYS_CTRL_LT_ENABLE;
> - writel(val, pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
> + writel(val, pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
> }
>
> static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -1861,12 +1865,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> }
>
> - pcie->elbi = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "elbi");
> - if (IS_ERR(pcie->elbi)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(pcie->elbi);
> - goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> - }
> -
> /* MHI region is optional */
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "mhi");
> if (res) {
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:14:59PM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 01:04:24PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> > Instead of using qcom ELBI resources mapping let the DWC core map it
> > ELBI is DWC specific.
>
> This seems like basically the same change you (Mani) added to the
> "[PATCH v8 2/5] PCI: dwc: Add support for ELBI resource mapping"
> patch? (The patch with Mani's additions is at
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=controller/dwc-ecam&id=d39e0103e38f9889271a77a837b6179b42d6730d)
>
Doh! This should've been squashed to patch 2/5 as we cannot split the conversion
patches. The reason is, we cannot ioremap() the same region twice.
This is now taken care in the branch.
- Mani
> If this qcom change is separated out, why can't the exynos and qcom-ep
> changes from patch 2/5 be separated out? If we ever had to bisect
> and/or revert parts of this, it seems like it would be simpler to do
> them consistently like this:
>
> - PCI: dwc: Add ELBI resource mapping
> - PCI: exynos: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping
> - PCI: qcom: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping
> - PCI: qcom-ep: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping
>
> > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 16 +++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > index 294babe1816e4d0c2b2343fe22d89af72afcd6cd..5092752de23866ef95036bb3f8fae9bb06e8ea1e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > @@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ struct qcom_pcie_port {
> > struct qcom_pcie {
> > struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > void __iomem *parf; /* DT parf */
> > - void __iomem *elbi; /* DT elbi */
> > void __iomem *mhi;
> > union qcom_pcie_resources res;
> > struct phy *phy;
> > @@ -414,12 +413,17 @@ static void qcom_pcie_configure_dbi_atu_base(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >
> > static void qcom_pcie_2_1_0_ltssm_enable(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > {
> > + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> > u32 val;
> >
> > + if (!pci->elbi_base) {
> > + dev_err(pci->dev, "ELBI is not present\n");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > /* enable link training */
> > - val = readl(pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
> > + val = readl(pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
> > val |= ELBI_SYS_CTRL_LT_ENABLE;
> > - writel(val, pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
> > + writel(val, pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
> > }
> >
> > static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > @@ -1861,12 +1865,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> > }
> >
> > - pcie->elbi = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "elbi");
> > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->elbi)) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(pcie->elbi);
> > - goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> > - }
> > -
> > /* MHI region is optional */
> > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "mhi");
> > if (res) {
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.