Instead of using qcom ELBI resources mapping let the DWC core map it
ELBI is DWC specific.
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
index 294babe1816e4d0c2b2343fe22d89af72afcd6cd..5092752de23866ef95036bb3f8fae9bb06e8ea1e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
@@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ struct qcom_pcie_port {
struct qcom_pcie {
struct dw_pcie *pci;
void __iomem *parf; /* DT parf */
- void __iomem *elbi; /* DT elbi */
void __iomem *mhi;
union qcom_pcie_resources res;
struct phy *phy;
@@ -414,12 +413,17 @@ static void qcom_pcie_configure_dbi_atu_base(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
static void qcom_pcie_2_1_0_ltssm_enable(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
{
+ struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
u32 val;
+ if (!pci->elbi_base) {
+ dev_err(pci->dev, "ELBI is not present\n");
+ return;
+ }
/* enable link training */
- val = readl(pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
+ val = readl(pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
val |= ELBI_SYS_CTRL_LT_ENABLE;
- writel(val, pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
+ writel(val, pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL);
}
static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
@@ -1861,12 +1865,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_pm_runtime_put;
}
- pcie->elbi = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "elbi");
- if (IS_ERR(pcie->elbi)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(pcie->elbi);
- goto err_pm_runtime_put;
- }
-
/* MHI region is optional */
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "mhi");
if (res) {
--
2.34.1
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 01:04:24PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > Instead of using qcom ELBI resources mapping let the DWC core map it > ELBI is DWC specific. This seems like basically the same change you (Mani) added to the "[PATCH v8 2/5] PCI: dwc: Add support for ELBI resource mapping" patch? (The patch with Mani's additions is at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=controller/dwc-ecam&id=d39e0103e38f9889271a77a837b6179b42d6730d) If this qcom change is separated out, why can't the exynos and qcom-ep changes from patch 2/5 be separated out? If we ever had to bisect and/or revert parts of this, it seems like it would be simpler to do them consistently like this: - PCI: dwc: Add ELBI resource mapping - PCI: exynos: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping - PCI: qcom: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping - PCI: qcom-ep: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 16 +++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > index 294babe1816e4d0c2b2343fe22d89af72afcd6cd..5092752de23866ef95036bb3f8fae9bb06e8ea1e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > @@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ struct qcom_pcie_port { > struct qcom_pcie { > struct dw_pcie *pci; > void __iomem *parf; /* DT parf */ > - void __iomem *elbi; /* DT elbi */ > void __iomem *mhi; > union qcom_pcie_resources res; > struct phy *phy; > @@ -414,12 +413,17 @@ static void qcom_pcie_configure_dbi_atu_base(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > > static void qcom_pcie_2_1_0_ltssm_enable(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > { > + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci; > u32 val; > > + if (!pci->elbi_base) { > + dev_err(pci->dev, "ELBI is not present\n"); > + return; > + } > /* enable link training */ > - val = readl(pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL); > + val = readl(pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL); > val |= ELBI_SYS_CTRL_LT_ENABLE; > - writel(val, pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL); > + writel(val, pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL); > } > > static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > @@ -1861,12 +1865,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto err_pm_runtime_put; > } > > - pcie->elbi = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "elbi"); > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->elbi)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR(pcie->elbi); > - goto err_pm_runtime_put; > - } > - > /* MHI region is optional */ > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "mhi"); > if (res) { > > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:14:59PM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 01:04:24PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > > Instead of using qcom ELBI resources mapping let the DWC core map it > > ELBI is DWC specific. > > This seems like basically the same change you (Mani) added to the > "[PATCH v8 2/5] PCI: dwc: Add support for ELBI resource mapping" > patch? (The patch with Mani's additions is at > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=controller/dwc-ecam&id=d39e0103e38f9889271a77a837b6179b42d6730d) > Doh! This should've been squashed to patch 2/5 as we cannot split the conversion patches. The reason is, we cannot ioremap() the same region twice. This is now taken care in the branch. - Mani > If this qcom change is separated out, why can't the exynos and qcom-ep > changes from patch 2/5 be separated out? If we ever had to bisect > and/or revert parts of this, it seems like it would be simpler to do > them consistently like this: > > - PCI: dwc: Add ELBI resource mapping > - PCI: exynos: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping > - PCI: qcom: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping > - PCI: qcom-ep: Switch to dwc ELBI resource mapping > > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> > > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 16 +++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > > index 294babe1816e4d0c2b2343fe22d89af72afcd6cd..5092752de23866ef95036bb3f8fae9bb06e8ea1e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > > @@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ struct qcom_pcie_port { > > struct qcom_pcie { > > struct dw_pcie *pci; > > void __iomem *parf; /* DT parf */ > > - void __iomem *elbi; /* DT elbi */ > > void __iomem *mhi; > > union qcom_pcie_resources res; > > struct phy *phy; > > @@ -414,12 +413,17 @@ static void qcom_pcie_configure_dbi_atu_base(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > > > > static void qcom_pcie_2_1_0_ltssm_enable(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > > { > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci; > > u32 val; > > > > + if (!pci->elbi_base) { > > + dev_err(pci->dev, "ELBI is not present\n"); > > + return; > > + } > > /* enable link training */ > > - val = readl(pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL); > > + val = readl(pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL); > > val |= ELBI_SYS_CTRL_LT_ENABLE; > > - writel(val, pcie->elbi + ELBI_SYS_CTRL); > > + writel(val, pci->elbi_base + ELBI_SYS_CTRL); > > } > > > > static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > > @@ -1861,12 +1865,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > goto err_pm_runtime_put; > > } > > > > - pcie->elbi = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "elbi"); > > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->elbi)) { > > - ret = PTR_ERR(pcie->elbi); > > - goto err_pm_runtime_put; > > - } > > - > > /* MHI region is optional */ > > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "mhi"); > > if (res) { > > > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.