On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:30AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> It's no longer required to use nth_page() when iterating pages within a
> single SG entry, so let's drop the nth_page() usage.
>
> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
LGTM, so:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> index c9853d887d282..d3f160dc0da4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> @@ -560,8 +560,7 @@ static int h_mspro_block_transfer_data(struct memstick_dev *card,
> t_offset += msb->current_page * msb->page_size;
>
> sg_set_page(&t_sg,
> - nth_page(sg_page(&(msb->req_sg[msb->current_seg])),
> - t_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT),
> + sg_page(&(msb->req_sg[msb->current_seg])) + (t_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT),
> msb->page_size, offset_in_page(t_offset));
>
> memstick_init_req_sg(*mrq, msb->data_dir == READ
> --
> 2.50.1
>