在 2025/8/27 11:50, Zihuan Zhang 写道:
> Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy)
> annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference
> counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
> index 99390ec1481f..65117569d0f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
> @@ -144,19 +144,16 @@ static int update_pd_power_uw(struct dtpm *dtpm)
> static void pd_release(struct dtpm *dtpm)
> {
> struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu = to_dtpm_cpu(dtpm);
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
>
> if (freq_qos_request_active(&dtpm_cpu->qos_req))
> freq_qos_remove_request(&dtpm_cpu->qos_req);
>
> policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
> - if (policy) {
> + if (policy)
> for_each_cpu(dtpm_cpu->cpu, policy->related_cpus)
> per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, dtpm_cpu->cpu) = NULL;
>
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> - }
> -
> kfree(dtpm_cpu);
> }
>
> @@ -192,7 +189,7 @@ static int cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> static int __dtpm_cpu_setup(int cpu, struct dtpm *parent)
> {
> struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu;
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
> struct em_perf_state *table;
> struct em_perf_domain *pd;
> char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN];
> @@ -207,16 +204,12 @@ static int __dtpm_cpu_setup(int cpu, struct dtpm *parent)
> return 0;
>
> pd = em_cpu_get(cpu);
> - if (!pd || em_is_artificial(pd)) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto release_policy;
> - }
> + if (!pd || em_is_artificial(pd))
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> dtpm_cpu = kzalloc(sizeof(*dtpm_cpu), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!dtpm_cpu) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto release_policy;
> - }
> + if (!dtpm_cpu)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> dtpm_init(&dtpm_cpu->dtpm, &dtpm_ops);
> dtpm_cpu->cpu = cpu;
> @@ -239,7 +232,6 @@ static int __dtpm_cpu_setup(int cpu, struct dtpm *parent)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_dtpm_unregister;
>
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> return 0;
>
> out_dtpm_unregister:
> @@ -251,8 +243,6 @@ static int __dtpm_cpu_setup(int cpu, struct dtpm *parent)
> per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, cpu) = NULL;
> kfree(dtpm_cpu);
>
> -release_policy:
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> return ret;
> }
>
I accidentally sent a duplicate patch in the series.
Please ignore the extra one, sorry for the noise.