MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build
information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the
information from SM.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
.../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd {
SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3,
SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4,
+ SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6,
SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8,
};
@@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out {
__le32 val[];
};
+struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out {
+ __le32 buildnum;
+ __le32 buildcommit;
+#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16
+ u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE];
+#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16
+ u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
+};
+
static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi)
{
@@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
return ret;
}
+static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
+{
+ char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
+ struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out;
+ struct scmi_xfer *t;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0,
+ sizeof(*out), &t);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
+ if (!ret) {
+ out = t->rx.buf;
+ strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE);
+ strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME);
+ dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n",
+ le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit),
+ date, time);
+ }
+
+ ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static const struct scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops = {
.misc_ctrl_set = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set,
.misc_ctrl_get = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get,
@@ -299,6 +336,10 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(ph);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
return ph->set_priv(ph, minfo, version);
}
--
2.37.1
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build > information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the > information from SM. > > Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> > --- > .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c > index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd { > SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3, > SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4, > + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6, > SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8, > }; > > @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out { > __le32 val[]; > }; > > +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out { > + __le32 buildnum; > + __le32 buildcommit; > +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16 > + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE]; > +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16 > + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; > +}; > + > static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, > struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi) > { > @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, > return ret; > } > > +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) > +{ > + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; > + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out; > + struct scmi_xfer *t; > + int ret; > + > + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0, > + sizeof(*out), &t); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t); > + if (!ret) { > + out = t->rx.buf; > + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE); > + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME); > + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n", > + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit), > + date, time); And fix the alignment above, just noticed after hitting enter. -- Regards, Sudeep
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:50:20AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: >On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: >> MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build >> information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the >> information from SM. >> >> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> >> --- >> .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c >> index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644 >> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c >> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ >> enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd { >> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3, >> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4, >> + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6, >> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8, >> }; >> >> @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out { >> __le32 val[]; >> }; >> >> +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out { >> + __le32 buildnum; >> + __le32 buildcommit; >> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16 >> + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE]; >> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16 >> + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; >> +}; >> + >> static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, >> struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi) >> { >> @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) >> +{ >> + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; >> + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out; >> + struct scmi_xfer *t; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0, >> + sizeof(*out), &t); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t); >> + if (!ret) { >> + out = t->rx.buf; >> + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE); >> + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME); >> + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n", >> + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit), >> + date, time); > >And fix the alignment above, just noticed after hitting enter. My bad, just not sure why "b4 prep --check" not report warning for this. Thanks, Peng > >-- >Regards, >Sudeep
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build > information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the > information from SM. > > Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> > --- > .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c > index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd { > SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3, > SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4, > + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6, > SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8, > }; > > @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out { > __le32 val[]; > }; > > +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out { > + __le32 buildnum; > + __le32 buildcommit; > +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16 > + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE]; > +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16 > + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; > +}; > + > static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, > struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi) > { > @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, > return ret; > } > > +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) > +{ > + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; > + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out; > + struct scmi_xfer *t; > + int ret; > + > + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0, > + sizeof(*out), &t); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t); > + if (!ret) { > + out = t->rx.buf; > + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE); > + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME); > + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n", > + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit), > + date, time); > + } > + > + ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static const struct scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops = { > .misc_ctrl_set = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set, > .misc_ctrl_get = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get, > @@ -299,6 +336,10 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + ret = scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(ph); To align with other naming, s/scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info/scmi_imx_misc_build_info_discover/ > + return ret; The document in 1/6 didn't state this as mandatory. IMO, it is not fair to return error if the return is NOT_SUPPORTED. -- Regards, Sudeep
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:48:56AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: >On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: >> MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build >> information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the >> information from SM. >> >> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> >> --- >> .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c >> index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644 >> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c >> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ >> enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd { >> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3, >> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4, >> + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6, >> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8, >> }; >> >> @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out { >> __le32 val[]; >> }; >> >> +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out { >> + __le32 buildnum; >> + __le32 buildcommit; >> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16 >> + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE]; >> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16 >> + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; >> +}; >> + >> static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, >> struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi) >> { >> @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) >> +{ >> + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; >> + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out; >> + struct scmi_xfer *t; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0, >> + sizeof(*out), &t); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t); >> + if (!ret) { >> + out = t->rx.buf; >> + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE); >> + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME); >> + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n", >> + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit), >> + date, time); >> + } >> + >> + ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> static const struct scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops = { >> .misc_ctrl_set = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set, >> .misc_ctrl_get = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get, >> @@ -299,6 +336,10 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> + ret = scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(ph); > >To align with other naming, > >s/scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info/scmi_imx_misc_build_info_discover/ > >> + return ret; > >The document in 1/6 didn't state this as mandatory. IMO, it is not >fair to return error if the return is NOT_SUPPORTED. I should use: if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) return ret; Thanks, Peng > >-- >Regards, >Sudeep
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:48:56AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: >On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: >> MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build >> information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the >> information from SM. >> >> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> >> --- >> .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c >> index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644 >> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c >> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ >> enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd { >> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3, >> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4, >> + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6, >> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8, >> }; >> >> @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out { >> __le32 val[]; >> }; >> >> +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out { >> + __le32 buildnum; >> + __le32 buildcommit; >> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16 >> + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE]; >> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16 >> + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; >> +}; >> + >> static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, >> struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi) >> { >> @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) >> +{ >> + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME]; >> + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out; >> + struct scmi_xfer *t; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0, >> + sizeof(*out), &t); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t); >> + if (!ret) { >> + out = t->rx.buf; >> + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE); >> + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME); >> + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n", >> + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit), >> + date, time); >> + } >> + >> + ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> static const struct scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops = { >> .misc_ctrl_set = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set, >> .misc_ctrl_get = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get, >> @@ -299,6 +336,10 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph) >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> + ret = scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(ph); > >To align with other naming, > >s/scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info/scmi_imx_misc_build_info_discover/ Fix in V4. > >> + return ret; > >The document in 1/6 didn't state this as mandatory. IMO, it is not >fair to return error if the return is NOT_SUPPORTED. Indeed. I will use below: ret = scmi_imx_misc_build_info_discover(ph); if (ret) dev_err("Failed to get build info: %d\n", ret); Thanks, Peng > >-- >Regards, >Sudeep
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.