MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build
information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the
information from SM.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
.../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd {
SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3,
SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4,
+ SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6,
SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8,
};
@@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out {
__le32 val[];
};
+struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out {
+ __le32 buildnum;
+ __le32 buildcommit;
+#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16
+ u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE];
+#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16
+ u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
+};
+
static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi)
{
@@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
return ret;
}
+static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
+{
+ char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
+ struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out;
+ struct scmi_xfer *t;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0,
+ sizeof(*out), &t);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
+ if (!ret) {
+ out = t->rx.buf;
+ strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE);
+ strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME);
+ dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n",
+ le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit),
+ date, time);
+ }
+
+ ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static const struct scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops = {
.misc_ctrl_set = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set,
.misc_ctrl_get = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get,
@@ -299,6 +336,10 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(ph);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
return ph->set_priv(ph, minfo, version);
}
--
2.37.1
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build
> information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the
> information from SM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
> index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd {
> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3,
> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4,
> + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6,
> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8,
> };
>
> @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out {
> __le32 val[];
> };
>
> +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out {
> + __le32 buildnum;
> + __le32 buildcommit;
> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16
> + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE];
> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16
> + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
> +};
> +
> static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi)
> {
> @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
> +{
> + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
> + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out;
> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0,
> + sizeof(*out), &t);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
> + if (!ret) {
> + out = t->rx.buf;
> + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE);
> + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME);
> + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n",
> + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit),
> + date, time);
And fix the alignment above, just noticed after hitting enter.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:50:20AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build
>> information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the
>> information from SM.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>> ---
>> .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
>> index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd {
>> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3,
>> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4,
>> + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6,
>> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out {
>> __le32 val[];
>> };
>>
>> +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out {
>> + __le32 buildnum;
>> + __le32 buildcommit;
>> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16
>> + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE];
>> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16
>> + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
>> +};
>> +
>> static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>> struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi)
>> {
>> @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
>> +{
>> + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
>> + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out;
>> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0,
>> + sizeof(*out), &t);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + out = t->rx.buf;
>> + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE);
>> + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME);
>> + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n",
>> + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit),
>> + date, time);
>
>And fix the alignment above, just noticed after hitting enter.
My bad, just not sure why "b4 prep --check" not report warning for this.
Thanks,
Peng
>
>--
>Regards,
>Sudeep
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build
> information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the
> information from SM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
> index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd {
> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3,
> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4,
> + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6,
> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8,
> };
>
> @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out {
> __le32 val[];
> };
>
> +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out {
> + __le32 buildnum;
> + __le32 buildcommit;
> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16
> + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE];
> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16
> + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
> +};
> +
> static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi)
> {
> @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
> +{
> + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
> + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out;
> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0,
> + sizeof(*out), &t);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
> + if (!ret) {
> + out = t->rx.buf;
> + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE);
> + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME);
> + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n",
> + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit),
> + date, time);
> + }
> +
> + ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static const struct scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops = {
> .misc_ctrl_set = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set,
> .misc_ctrl_get = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get,
> @@ -299,6 +336,10 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(ph);
To align with other naming,
s/scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info/scmi_imx_misc_build_info_discover/
> + return ret;
The document in 1/6 didn't state this as mandatory. IMO, it is not
fair to return error if the return is NOT_SUPPORTED.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:48:56AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build
>> information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the
>> information from SM.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>> ---
>> .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
>> index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd {
>> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3,
>> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4,
>> + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6,
>> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out {
>> __le32 val[];
>> };
>>
>> +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out {
>> + __le32 buildnum;
>> + __le32 buildcommit;
>> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16
>> + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE];
>> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16
>> + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
>> +};
>> +
>> static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>> struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi)
>> {
>> @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
>> +{
>> + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
>> + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out;
>> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0,
>> + sizeof(*out), &t);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + out = t->rx.buf;
>> + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE);
>> + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME);
>> + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n",
>> + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit),
>> + date, time);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops = {
>> .misc_ctrl_set = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set,
>> .misc_ctrl_get = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get,
>> @@ -299,6 +336,10 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + ret = scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(ph);
>
>To align with other naming,
>
>s/scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info/scmi_imx_misc_build_info_discover/
>
>> + return ret;
>
>The document in 1/6 didn't state this as mandatory. IMO, it is not
>fair to return error if the return is NOT_SUPPORTED.
I should use:
if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
return ret;
Thanks,
Peng
>
>--
>Regards,
>Sudeep
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:48:56AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:59:14PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> MISC protocol supports discovering the System Manager(SM) build
>> information including build commit, build time and etc. Retrieve the
>> information from SM.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>> ---
>> .../firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
>> index a8915d3b4df518719d56bfff38922625ad9b70f6..464afeae8267d8c1eca4c4d5e008eca6d741c6ff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/vendors/imx/imx-sm-misc.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> enum scmi_imx_misc_protocol_cmd {
>> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_SET = 0x3,
>> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_GET = 0x4,
>> + SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO = 0x6,
>> SCMI_IMX_MISC_CTRL_NOTIFY = 0x8,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -65,6 +66,15 @@ struct scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get_out {
>> __le32 val[];
>> };
>>
>> +struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out {
>> + __le32 buildnum;
>> + __le32 buildcommit;
>> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE 16
>> + u8 builddate[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE];
>> +#define MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME 16
>> + u8 buildtime[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
>> +};
>> +
>> static int scmi_imx_misc_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>> struct scmi_imx_misc_info *mi)
>> {
>> @@ -272,6 +282,33 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
>> +{
>> + char date[MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE], time[MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME];
>> + struct scmi_imx_misc_buildinfo_out *out;
>> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, SCMI_IMX_MISC_DISCOVER_BUILDINFO, 0,
>> + sizeof(*out), &t);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + out = t->rx.buf;
>> + strscpy(date, out->builddate, MISC_MAX_BUILDDATE);
>> + strscpy(time, out->buildtime, MISC_MAX_BUILDTIME);
>> + dev_info(ph->dev, "SM Version\t= Build %u, Commit %08x %s %s\n",
>> + le32_to_cpu(out->buildnum), le32_to_cpu(out->buildcommit),
>> + date, time);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops scmi_imx_misc_proto_ops = {
>> .misc_ctrl_set = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set,
>> .misc_ctrl_get = scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get,
>> @@ -299,6 +336,10 @@ static int scmi_imx_misc_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + ret = scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info(ph);
>
>To align with other naming,
>
>s/scmi_imx_misc_discover_build_info/scmi_imx_misc_build_info_discover/
Fix in V4.
>
>> + return ret;
>
>The document in 1/6 didn't state this as mandatory. IMO, it is not
>fair to return error if the return is NOT_SUPPORTED.
Indeed. I will use below:
ret = scmi_imx_misc_build_info_discover(ph);
if (ret)
dev_err("Failed to get build info: %d\n", ret);
Thanks,
Peng
>
>--
>Regards,
>Sudeep
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.