From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com>
Document the compatible string for ARTPEC-8 SoC pinctrl block,
which is similar to other Samsung SoC pinctrl blocks.
Signed-off-by: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml
index de8460856141..9386dcd418c2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ properties:
compatible:
enum:
+ - axis,artpec8-pinctrl
- google,gs101-pinctrl
- samsung,s3c2412-pinctrl
- samsung,s3c2416-pinctrl
--
2.49.0
On 25/08/2025 13:44, Ravi Patel wrote: > From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com> > > Document the compatible string for ARTPEC-8 SoC pinctrl block, > which is similar to other Samsung SoC pinctrl blocks. > > Signed-off-by: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com> > Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) No wakeup-eint interrupts here? samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml? Best regards, Krzysztof
> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > Sent: 31 August 2025 18:55 > To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com>; jesper.nilsson@axis.com; mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; > krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; cw00.choi@samsung.com; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; > linus.walleij@linaro.org; tomasz.figa@gmail.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com; will@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de > Cc: ksk4725@coasia.com; kenkim@coasia.com; pjsin865@coasia.com; gwk1013@coasia.com; hgkim05@coasia.com; > mingyoungbo@coasia.com; smn1196@coasia.com; pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; shradha.t@samsung.com; inbaraj.e@samsung.com; > swathi.ks@samsung.com; hrishikesh.d@samsung.com; dj76.yang@samsung.com; hypmean.kim@samsung.com; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@axis.com; linux- > clk@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; soc@lists.linux.dev > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible for ARTPEC-8 SoC > > On 25/08/2025 13:44, Ravi Patel wrote: > > From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com> > > > > Document the compatible string for ARTPEC-8 SoC pinctrl block, > > which is similar to other Samsung SoC pinctrl blocks. > > > > Signed-off-by: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > No wakeup-eint interrupts here? samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml? I don't see any use case for external wake-up interrupt here (as of now). So wakeup-eint entry is not present in dts and yaml both. Thanks, Ravi > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On 01/09/2025 05:41, Ravi Patel wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> >> Sent: 31 August 2025 18:55 >> To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com>; jesper.nilsson@axis.com; mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; >> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; cw00.choi@samsung.com; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; >> linus.walleij@linaro.org; tomasz.figa@gmail.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com; will@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de >> Cc: ksk4725@coasia.com; kenkim@coasia.com; pjsin865@coasia.com; gwk1013@coasia.com; hgkim05@coasia.com; >> mingyoungbo@coasia.com; smn1196@coasia.com; pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; shradha.t@samsung.com; inbaraj.e@samsung.com; >> swathi.ks@samsung.com; hrishikesh.d@samsung.com; dj76.yang@samsung.com; hypmean.kim@samsung.com; linux- >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@axis.com; linux- >> clk@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; soc@lists.linux.dev >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible for ARTPEC-8 SoC >> >> On 25/08/2025 13:44, Ravi Patel wrote: >>> From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com> >>> >>> Document the compatible string for ARTPEC-8 SoC pinctrl block, >>> which is similar to other Samsung SoC pinctrl blocks. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> >> No wakeup-eint interrupts here? samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml? > > I don't see any use case for external wake-up interrupt here (as of now). It is more about hardware, not use case. Does this hardware has EINT wakeup pin banks? > So wakeup-eint entry is not present in dts and yaml both. Best regards, Krzysztof
> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > Sent: 01 September 2025 10:42 > To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com>; jesper.nilsson@axis.com; mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; > krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; cw00.choi@samsung.com; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; > linus.walleij@linaro.org; tomasz.figa@gmail.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com; will@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de > Cc: ksk4725@coasia.com; kenkim@coasia.com; pjsin865@coasia.com; gwk1013@coasia.com; hgkim05@coasia.com; > mingyoungbo@coasia.com; smn1196@coasia.com; pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; shradha.t@samsung.com; inbaraj.e@samsung.com; > swathi.ks@samsung.com; hrishikesh.d@samsung.com; dj76.yang@samsung.com; hypmean.kim@samsung.com; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@axis.com; linux- > clk@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; soc@lists.linux.dev > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible for ARTPEC-8 SoC > > On 01/09/2025 05:41, Ravi Patel wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > >> Sent: 31 August 2025 18:55 > >> To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com>; jesper.nilsson@axis.com; mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; > >> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; cw00.choi@samsung.com; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; > >> linus.walleij@linaro.org; tomasz.figa@gmail.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com; will@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de > >> Cc: ksk4725@coasia.com; kenkim@coasia.com; pjsin865@coasia.com; gwk1013@coasia.com; hgkim05@coasia.com; > >> mingyoungbo@coasia.com; smn1196@coasia.com; pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; shradha.t@samsung.com; inbaraj.e@samsung.com; > >> swathi.ks@samsung.com; hrishikesh.d@samsung.com; dj76.yang@samsung.com; hypmean.kim@samsung.com; linux- > >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@axis.com; linux- > >> clk@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; soc@lists.linux.dev > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible for ARTPEC-8 SoC > >> > >> On 25/08/2025 13:44, Ravi Patel wrote: > >>> From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com> > >>> > >>> Document the compatible string for ARTPEC-8 SoC pinctrl block, > >>> which is similar to other Samsung SoC pinctrl blocks. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com> > >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com> > >>> --- > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml | 1 + > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> > >> No wakeup-eint interrupts here? samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml? > > > > I don't see any use case for external wake-up interrupt here (as of now). > > It is more about hardware, not use case. Does this hardware has EINT > wakeup pin banks? I checked SFR sheet, ARTPEC-8 does not have any EINT wakeup pins or SFRs. Thanks, Ravi > > > So wakeup-eint entry is not present in dts and yaml both. > > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On 01/09/2025 07:29, Ravi Patel wrote: >>>> >>>> No wakeup-eint interrupts here? samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml? >>> >>> I don't see any use case for external wake-up interrupt here (as of now). >> >> It is more about hardware, not use case. Does this hardware has EINT >> wakeup pin banks? > > I checked SFR sheet, ARTPEC-8 does not have any EINT wakeup pins or SFRs. OK Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.