[PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM

Nickolay Goppen via B4 Relay posted 3 patches 1 month, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM
Posted by Nickolay Goppen via B4 Relay 1 month, 1 week ago
From: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>

The Snapdragon 660 has a Low-Power Island (LPI) TLMM for configuring
pins related to audio. Add the driver for this.
Also, this driver uses it's own quirky pin_offset function like downstream
driver does [1].

[1] https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-4.4/-/blob/LA.UM.7.2.c27-07400-sdm660.0/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpi.c#L107

Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@yandex.ru>
Signed-off-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@yandex.ru>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig                    |  10 ++
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile                   |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 207 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
index dd9bbe8f3e11c37418d2143b33c21eeea10d456b..ef42520115f461302098d878cb76c6f25e55b5e4 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
@@ -68,6 +68,16 @@ config PINCTRL_SC7280_LPASS_LPI
 	  Qualcomm Technologies Inc LPASS (Low Power Audio SubSystem) LPI
 	  (Low Power Island) found on the Qualcomm Technologies Inc SC7280 platform.
 
+config PINCTRL_SDM660_LPASS_LPI
+	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies Inc SDM660 LPASS LPI pin controller driver"
+	depends on GPIOLIB
+	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI
+	help
+	  This is the pinctrl, pinmux, pinconf and gpiolib driver for the
+	  Qualcomm Technologies Inc LPASS (Low Power Audio SubSystem) LPI
+	  (Low Power Island) found on the Qualcomm Technologies Inc SDM660 platform.
+
 config PINCTRL_SM4250_LPASS_LPI
 	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies Inc SM4250 LPASS LPI pin controller driver"
 	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
index 954f5291cc37242baffc021e3c68d850aabd57cd..cea8617ac650ecfc75c2a0c745a53d6a1b829842 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SC7280_LPASS_LPI) += pinctrl-sc7280-lpass-lpi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SC8180X)	+= pinctrl-sc8180x.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SC8280XP)	+= pinctrl-sc8280xp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM660)   += pinctrl-sdm660.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM660_LPASS_LPI) += pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM670) += pinctrl-sdm670.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM845) += pinctrl-sdm845.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDX55) += pinctrl-sdx55.o
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36fba93fda1160ad51a979996f8007393555f222
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * This driver is solely based on the limited information in downstream code.
+ * Any verification with schematics would be greatly appreciated.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Richard Acayan. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
+
+#include "pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h"
+
+enum lpass_lpi_functions {
+	LPI_MUX_comp_rx,
+	LPI_MUX_dmic12,
+	LPI_MUX_dmic34,
+	LPI_MUX_mclk0,
+	LPI_MUX_pdm_2_gpios,
+	LPI_MUX_pdm_clk,
+	LPI_MUX_pdm_rx,
+	LPI_MUX_pdm_sync,
+
+	LPI_MUX_gpio,
+	LPI_MUX__,
+};
+
+static const u32 sdm660_lpi_offset[] = {
+	0x00000000,
+	0x00001000,
+	0x00002000,
+	0x00002010,
+	0x00003000,
+	0x00003010,
+	0x00004000,
+	0x00004010,
+	0x00005000,
+	0x00005010,
+	0x00005020,
+	0x00005030,
+	0x00006000,
+	0x00006010,
+	0x00007000,
+	0x00007010,
+	0x00005040,
+	0x00005050,
+	0x00008000,
+	0x00008010,
+	0x00008020,
+	0x00008030,
+	0x00008040,
+	0x00008050,
+	0x00008060,
+	0x00008070,
+	0x00009000,
+	0x00009010,
+	0x0000a000,
+	0x0000a010,
+	0x0000b000,
+	0x0000b010,
+};
+
+static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_pins[] = {
+	PINCTRL_PIN(0, "gpio0"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(1, "gpio1"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(2, "gpio2"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(3, "gpio3"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(4, "gpio4"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(5, "gpio5"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(6, "gpio6"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(7, "gpio7"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(8, "gpio8"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(9, "gpio9"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(10, "gpio10"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(11, "gpio11"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(12, "gpio12"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(15, "gpio15"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(16, "gpio16"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(17, "gpio17"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(18, "gpio18"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(19, "gpio19"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(20, "gpio20"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(21, "gpio21"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(22, "gpio22"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(23, "gpio23"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(24, "gpio24"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(25, "gpio25"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(26, "gpio26"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(27, "gpio27"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(28, "gpio28"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(29, "gpio29"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(30, "gpio30"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(31, "gpio31"),
+};
+
+static const char * const comp_rx_groups[] = { "gpio22", "gpio24" };
+static const char * const dmic12_groups[] = { "gpio26", "gpio28" };
+static const char * const dmic34_groups[] = { "gpio27", "gpio29" };
+static const char * const mclk0_groups[] = { "gpio18" };
+static const char * const pdm_2_gpios_groups[] = { "gpio20" };
+static const char * const pdm_clk_groups[] = { "gpio18" };
+static const char * const pdm_rx_groups[] = { "gpio21", "gpio23", "gpio25" };
+static const char * const pdm_sync_groups[] = { "gpio19" };
+
+const struct lpi_pingroup sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups[] = {
+	LPI_PINGROUP(0, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(1, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(2, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(3, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(4, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(5, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(6, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(7, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(8, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(9, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(10, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(11, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(12, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(13, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(14, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(15, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(16, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(17, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+
+	/* The function names of the PDM GPIOs are derived from SDM670 */
+	LPI_PINGROUP(18, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_clk, mclk0, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(19, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_sync, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(20, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_2_gpios, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(21, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(22, LPI_NO_SLEW, comp_rx, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(23, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(24, LPI_NO_SLEW, comp_rx, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(25, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(26, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic12, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(27, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic34, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(28, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic12, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(29, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic34, _, _, _),
+
+	LPI_PINGROUP(30, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+	LPI_PINGROUP(31, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
+};
+
+const struct lpi_function sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions[] = {
+	LPI_FUNCTION(comp_rx),
+	LPI_FUNCTION(dmic12),
+	LPI_FUNCTION(dmic34),
+	LPI_FUNCTION(mclk0),
+	LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_2_gpios),
+	LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_clk),
+	LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_rx),
+	LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_sync),
+};
+
+static u32 lpi_pinctrl_pin_offset_sdm660(int pin_id)
+{
+	return sdm660_lpi_offset[pin_id];
+}
+
+static const struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_data = {
+	.pins = sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_pins,
+	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_pins),
+	.groups = sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups,
+	.ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups),
+	.functions = sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions,
+	.nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions),
+	.flags = LPI_FLAG_SLEW_RATE_SAME_REG,
+	.pin_offset = lpi_pinctrl_pin_offset_sdm660,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "qcom,sdm660-lpass-lpi-pinctrl",
+		.data = &sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_data,
+	},
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "qcom-sdm660-lpass-lpi-pinctrl",
+		.of_match_table = sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_of_match,
+	},
+	.probe = lpi_pinctrl_probe,
+	.remove = lpi_pinctrl_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI SDM660 LPI GPIO pin control driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

-- 
2.51.0
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 1 month, 1 week ago
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 03:32:30PM +0300, Nickolay Goppen via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
> 
> The Snapdragon 660 has a Low-Power Island (LPI) TLMM for configuring
> pins related to audio. Add the driver for this.
> Also, this driver uses it's own quirky pin_offset function like downstream
> driver does [1].
> 
> [1] https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-4.4/-/blob/LA.UM.7.2.c27-07400-sdm660.0/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpi.c#L107
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
> Co-developed-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@yandex.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@yandex.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig                    |  10 ++
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile                   |   1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 207 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM
Posted by Bjorn Andersson 1 month, 1 week ago
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 03:32:30PM +0300, Nickolay Goppen via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
> 
> The Snapdragon 660 has a Low-Power Island (LPI) TLMM for configuring
> pins related to audio. Add the driver for this.
> Also, this driver uses it's own quirky pin_offset function like downstream
> driver does [1].

Please describe the quirky behavior in the commit message, rather than
just referencing the downstream code.

> 
> [1] https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-4.4/-/blob/LA.UM.7.2.c27-07400-sdm660.0/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpi.c#L107
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
> Co-developed-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@yandex.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@yandex.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig                    |  10 ++
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile                   |   1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 207 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
> index dd9bbe8f3e11c37418d2143b33c21eeea10d456b..ef42520115f461302098d878cb76c6f25e55b5e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
> @@ -68,6 +68,16 @@ config PINCTRL_SC7280_LPASS_LPI
>  	  Qualcomm Technologies Inc LPASS (Low Power Audio SubSystem) LPI
>  	  (Low Power Island) found on the Qualcomm Technologies Inc SC7280 platform.
>  
> +config PINCTRL_SDM660_LPASS_LPI
> +	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies Inc SDM660 LPASS LPI pin controller driver"
> +	depends on GPIOLIB
> +	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> +	depends on PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI
> +	help
> +	  This is the pinctrl, pinmux, pinconf and gpiolib driver for the
> +	  Qualcomm Technologies Inc LPASS (Low Power Audio SubSystem) LPI
> +	  (Low Power Island) found on the Qualcomm Technologies Inc SDM660 platform.
> +
>  config PINCTRL_SM4250_LPASS_LPI
>  	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies Inc SM4250 LPASS LPI pin controller driver"
>  	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
> index 954f5291cc37242baffc021e3c68d850aabd57cd..cea8617ac650ecfc75c2a0c745a53d6a1b829842 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SC7280_LPASS_LPI) += pinctrl-sc7280-lpass-lpi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SC8180X)	+= pinctrl-sc8180x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SC8280XP)	+= pinctrl-sc8280xp.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM660)   += pinctrl-sdm660.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM660_LPASS_LPI) += pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM670) += pinctrl-sdm670.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM845) += pinctrl-sdm845.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDX55) += pinctrl-sdx55.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36fba93fda1160ad51a979996f8007393555f222
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * This driver is solely based on the limited information in downstream code.
> + * Any verification with schematics would be greatly appreciated.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Richard Acayan. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
> +
> +#include "pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h"
> +
> +enum lpass_lpi_functions {
> +	LPI_MUX_comp_rx,
> +	LPI_MUX_dmic12,
> +	LPI_MUX_dmic34,
> +	LPI_MUX_mclk0,
> +	LPI_MUX_pdm_2_gpios,
> +	LPI_MUX_pdm_clk,
> +	LPI_MUX_pdm_rx,
> +	LPI_MUX_pdm_sync,
> +
> +	LPI_MUX_gpio,
> +	LPI_MUX__,
> +};
> +
> +static const u32 sdm660_lpi_offset[] = {

This should be write only, but I still find it error prone and ugly to
keep this array separate of the pingroups - and I don't fancy the extra
indirect jump just to lookup an element in the array.

Can't we instead extend lpi_pingroup with an "reg_offset", and then use
lpi_pinctrl_variant_data->flags to indicate when this should be used?

That consolidates the information in the groups[] and avoids the
additional function calls.

Regards,
Bjorn

> +	0x00000000,
> +	0x00001000,
> +	0x00002000,
> +	0x00002010,
> +	0x00003000,
> +	0x00003010,
> +	0x00004000,
> +	0x00004010,
> +	0x00005000,
> +	0x00005010,
> +	0x00005020,
> +	0x00005030,
> +	0x00006000,
> +	0x00006010,
> +	0x00007000,
> +	0x00007010,
> +	0x00005040,
> +	0x00005050,
> +	0x00008000,
> +	0x00008010,
> +	0x00008020,
> +	0x00008030,
> +	0x00008040,
> +	0x00008050,
> +	0x00008060,
> +	0x00008070,
> +	0x00009000,
> +	0x00009010,
> +	0x0000a000,
> +	0x0000a010,
> +	0x0000b000,
> +	0x0000b010,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_pins[] = {
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(0, "gpio0"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(1, "gpio1"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(2, "gpio2"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(3, "gpio3"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(4, "gpio4"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(5, "gpio5"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(6, "gpio6"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(7, "gpio7"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(8, "gpio8"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(9, "gpio9"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(10, "gpio10"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(11, "gpio11"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(12, "gpio12"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(15, "gpio15"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(16, "gpio16"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(17, "gpio17"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(18, "gpio18"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(19, "gpio19"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(20, "gpio20"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(21, "gpio21"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(22, "gpio22"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(23, "gpio23"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(24, "gpio24"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(25, "gpio25"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(26, "gpio26"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(27, "gpio27"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(28, "gpio28"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(29, "gpio29"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(30, "gpio30"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(31, "gpio31"),
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const comp_rx_groups[] = { "gpio22", "gpio24" };
> +static const char * const dmic12_groups[] = { "gpio26", "gpio28" };
> +static const char * const dmic34_groups[] = { "gpio27", "gpio29" };
> +static const char * const mclk0_groups[] = { "gpio18" };
> +static const char * const pdm_2_gpios_groups[] = { "gpio20" };
> +static const char * const pdm_clk_groups[] = { "gpio18" };
> +static const char * const pdm_rx_groups[] = { "gpio21", "gpio23", "gpio25" };
> +static const char * const pdm_sync_groups[] = { "gpio19" };
> +
> +const struct lpi_pingroup sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups[] = {
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(0, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(1, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(2, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(3, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(4, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(5, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(6, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(7, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(8, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(9, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(10, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(11, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(12, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(13, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(14, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(15, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(16, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(17, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +
> +	/* The function names of the PDM GPIOs are derived from SDM670 */
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(18, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_clk, mclk0, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(19, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_sync, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(20, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_2_gpios, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(21, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(22, LPI_NO_SLEW, comp_rx, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(23, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(24, LPI_NO_SLEW, comp_rx, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(25, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(26, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic12, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(27, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic34, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(28, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic12, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(29, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic34, _, _, _),
> +
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(30, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(31, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
> +};
> +
> +const struct lpi_function sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions[] = {
> +	LPI_FUNCTION(comp_rx),
> +	LPI_FUNCTION(dmic12),
> +	LPI_FUNCTION(dmic34),
> +	LPI_FUNCTION(mclk0),
> +	LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_2_gpios),
> +	LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_clk),
> +	LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_rx),
> +	LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_sync),
> +};
> +
> +static u32 lpi_pinctrl_pin_offset_sdm660(int pin_id)
> +{
> +	return sdm660_lpi_offset[pin_id];
> +}
> +
> +static const struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_data = {
> +	.pins = sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_pins,
> +	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_pins),
> +	.groups = sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups,
> +	.ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups),
> +	.functions = sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions,
> +	.nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions),
> +	.flags = LPI_FLAG_SLEW_RATE_SAME_REG,
> +	.pin_offset = lpi_pinctrl_pin_offset_sdm660,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "qcom,sdm660-lpass-lpi-pinctrl",
> +		.data = &sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_data,
> +	},
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "qcom-sdm660-lpass-lpi-pinctrl",
> +		.of_match_table = sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_of_match,
> +	},
> +	.probe = lpi_pinctrl_probe,
> +	.remove = lpi_pinctrl_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI SDM660 LPI GPIO pin control driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 
>
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 1 month, 1 week ago
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 10:00:28PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 03:32:30PM +0300, Nickolay Goppen via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
> > 
> > The Snapdragon 660 has a Low-Power Island (LPI) TLMM for configuring
> > pins related to audio. Add the driver for this.
> > Also, this driver uses it's own quirky pin_offset function like downstream
> > driver does [1].
> 
> Please describe the quirky behavior in the commit message, rather than
> just referencing the downstream code.
> 
> > 
> > [1] https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-4.4/-/blob/LA.UM.7.2.c27-07400-sdm660.0/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpi.c#L107
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@yandex.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@yandex.ru>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig                    |  10 ++
> >  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile                   |   1 +
> >  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 207 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
> > index dd9bbe8f3e11c37418d2143b33c21eeea10d456b..ef42520115f461302098d878cb76c6f25e55b5e4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
> > @@ -68,6 +68,16 @@ config PINCTRL_SC7280_LPASS_LPI
> >  	  Qualcomm Technologies Inc LPASS (Low Power Audio SubSystem) LPI
> >  	  (Low Power Island) found on the Qualcomm Technologies Inc SC7280 platform.
> >  
> > +config PINCTRL_SDM660_LPASS_LPI
> > +	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies Inc SDM660 LPASS LPI pin controller driver"
> > +	depends on GPIOLIB
> > +	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> > +	depends on PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI
> > +	help
> > +	  This is the pinctrl, pinmux, pinconf and gpiolib driver for the
> > +	  Qualcomm Technologies Inc LPASS (Low Power Audio SubSystem) LPI
> > +	  (Low Power Island) found on the Qualcomm Technologies Inc SDM660 platform.
> > +
> >  config PINCTRL_SM4250_LPASS_LPI
> >  	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies Inc SM4250 LPASS LPI pin controller driver"
> >  	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
> > index 954f5291cc37242baffc021e3c68d850aabd57cd..cea8617ac650ecfc75c2a0c745a53d6a1b829842 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SC7280_LPASS_LPI) += pinctrl-sc7280-lpass-lpi.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SC8180X)	+= pinctrl-sc8180x.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SC8280XP)	+= pinctrl-sc8280xp.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM660)   += pinctrl-sdm660.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM660_LPASS_LPI) += pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM670) += pinctrl-sdm670.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDM845) += pinctrl-sdm845.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SDX55) += pinctrl-sdx55.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36fba93fda1160ad51a979996f8007393555f222
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * This driver is solely based on the limited information in downstream code.
> > + * Any verification with schematics would be greatly appreciated.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2023, Richard Acayan. All rights reserved.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
> > +
> > +#include "pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h"
> > +
> > +enum lpass_lpi_functions {
> > +	LPI_MUX_comp_rx,
> > +	LPI_MUX_dmic12,
> > +	LPI_MUX_dmic34,
> > +	LPI_MUX_mclk0,
> > +	LPI_MUX_pdm_2_gpios,
> > +	LPI_MUX_pdm_clk,
> > +	LPI_MUX_pdm_rx,
> > +	LPI_MUX_pdm_sync,
> > +
> > +	LPI_MUX_gpio,
> > +	LPI_MUX__,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const u32 sdm660_lpi_offset[] = {
> 
> This should be write only, but I still find it error prone and ugly to
> keep this array separate of the pingroups - and I don't fancy the extra
> indirect jump just to lookup an element in the array.
> 
> Can't we instead extend lpi_pingroup with an "reg_offset", and then use
> lpi_pinctrl_variant_data->flags to indicate when this should be used?
> 
> That consolidates the information in the groups[] and avoids the
> additional function calls.

I R-B'ed too early. This seems to be a good idea.


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry