fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
The transaction manager initialization in txInit() was not properly
initializing TxBlock[0].waitor waitqueue, causing a crash when
txEnd(0) is called on read-only filesystems.
When a filesystem is mounted read-only, txBegin() returns tid=0 to
indicate no transaction. However, txEnd(0) still gets called and
tries to access TxBlock[0].waitor via tid_to_tblock(0), but this
waitqueue was never initialized because the initialization loop
started at index 1 instead of 0.
This causes a 'non-static key' lockdep warning and system crash:
INFO: trying to register non-static key in txEnd
Fix by ensuring all transaction blocks including TxBlock[0] have
their waitqueues properly initialized during txInit().
Reported-by: syzbot+c4f3462d8b2ad7977bea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shaurya Rane <ssrane_b23@ee.vjti.ac.in>
---
fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
index be17e3c43582..7840a03e5bcb 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
@@ -272,14 +272,15 @@ int txInit(void)
if (TxBlock == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- for (k = 1; k < nTxBlock - 1; k++) {
- TxBlock[k].next = k + 1;
+ for (k = 0; k < nTxBlock; k++) {
init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].gcwait);
init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].waitor);
}
+
+ for (k = 1; k < nTxBlock - 1; k++) {
+ TxBlock[k].next = k + 1;
+ }
TxBlock[k].next = 0;
- init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].gcwait);
- init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].waitor);
TxAnchor.freetid = 1;
init_waitqueue_head(&TxAnchor.freewait);
--
2.34.1
On 8/24/25 3:13PM, Shaurya Rane wrote: > The transaction manager initialization in txInit() was not properly > initializing TxBlock[0].waitor waitqueue, causing a crash when > txEnd(0) is called on read-only filesystems. > > When a filesystem is mounted read-only, txBegin() returns tid=0 to > indicate no transaction. However, txEnd(0) still gets called and > tries to access TxBlock[0].waitor via tid_to_tblock(0), but this > waitqueue was never initialized because the initialization loop > started at index 1 instead of 0. > > This causes a 'non-static key' lockdep warning and system crash: > INFO: trying to register non-static key in txEnd > > Fix by ensuring all transaction blocks including TxBlock[0] have > their waitqueues properly initialized during txInit(). > > Reported-by: syzbot+c4f3462d8b2ad7977bea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Shaurya Rane <ssrane_b23@ee.vjti.ac.in> Looks good, and the code even looks prettier. Applying and testing. Thanks, Shaggy > --- > fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c > index be17e3c43582..7840a03e5bcb 100644 > --- a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c > +++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c > @@ -272,14 +272,15 @@ int txInit(void) > if (TxBlock == NULL) > return -ENOMEM; > > - for (k = 1; k < nTxBlock - 1; k++) { > - TxBlock[k].next = k + 1; > + for (k = 0; k < nTxBlock; k++) { > init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].gcwait); > init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].waitor); > } > + > + for (k = 1; k < nTxBlock - 1; k++) { > + TxBlock[k].next = k + 1; > + } > TxBlock[k].next = 0; > - init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].gcwait); > - init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].waitor); > > TxAnchor.freetid = 1; > init_waitqueue_head(&TxAnchor.freewait);
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.