Fix a typo in the signal alternate stack test where the error
message incorrectly used tss_flags instead of the correct field
name ss_flags.

This change ensures the test output accurately reflects the
structure member being checked.

Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/signal/sas.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/signal/sas.c b/tools/testing/selftests/signal/sas.c
index 07227fab1cc98..476ffa807a61e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/signal/sas.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/signal/sas.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void my_usr1(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *u)
 		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 	}
 	if (stk.ss_flags != SS_DISABLE)
-		ksft_test_result_fail("tss_flags=%x, should be SS_DISABLE\n",
+		ksft_test_result_fail("ss_flags=%x, should be SS_DISABLE\n",
 				stk.ss_flags);
 	else
 		ksft_test_result_pass(
-- 
2.50.1

On 25/08/25 12:47 am, Alok Tiwari wrote:
> Fix a typo in the signal alternate stack test where the error
> message incorrectly used tss_flags instead of the correct field
> name ss_flags.
>
> This change ensures the test output accurately reflects the
> structure member being checked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
> ---
>   

Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>

On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 12:17:16PM -0700, Alok Tiwari wrote:
> Fix a typo in the signal alternate stack test where the error
> message incorrectly used tss_flags instead of the correct field
> name ss_flags.
> 
> This change ensures the test output accurately reflects the
> structure member being checked.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>