From: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com>

The comment was correct, but `checkpatch` script flagged it with a warning
as shown in the output section. The comment is slightly modified
to improve readability, which also suppresses the warning.

```
[command]
	./script/checkpatch.pl --strict -f tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c

[output]
	WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'on'
```

Fixes: 98102a2cb7860 : kselftest/arm64: Hold fp-stress children until they're all spawned.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
index 74e23208b94c..3a0ae96cf909 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
@@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ static void child_start(struct child_data *child, const char *program)
 
 		/*
 		 * Read from the startup pipe, there should be no data
-		 * and we should block until it is closed.  We just
-		 * carry on on error since this isn't super critical.
+		 * and we should block until it is closed. We just
+		 * carry-on on error since this isn't super critical.
 		 */
 		ret = read(3, &i, sizeof(i));
 		if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.25.1