[PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver

Jjian Zhou posted 2 patches 1 month, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Jjian Zhou 1 month, 1 week ago
Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver to support the communication with
VCP remote microprocessor.

Signed-off-by: Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/mailbox/Kconfig                 |   9 ++
 drivers/mailbox/Makefile                |   2 +
 drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c       | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h |  32 +++++
 4 files changed, 217 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
index 02432d4a5ccd..c28bdb855663 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
@@ -294,6 +294,15 @@ config MTK_CMDQ_MBOX
 	  critical time limitation, such as updating display configuration
 	  during the vblank.

+config MTK_VCP_MBOX
+	tristate "MediaTek VCP Mailbox Support"
+	depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek VCP mailbox driver.
+	  The mailbox implementation provides access from the application
+	  processor to Video Companion Processor Unit.
+	  If unsure say N.
+
 config ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
 	tristate "Xilinx ZynqMP IPI Mailbox"
 	depends on ARCH_ZYNQMP && OF
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
index 98a68f838486..07278871d254 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_ADSP_MBOX)	+= mtk-adsp-mailbox.o

 obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ_MBOX)	+= mtk-cmdq-mailbox.o

+obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_VCP_MBOX)	+= mtk-vcp-mailbox.o
+
 obj-$(CONFIG_ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX)	+= zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.o

 obj-$(CONFIG_SUN6I_MSGBOX)	+= sun6i-msgbox.o
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6f48215896d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2025 MediaTek Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou.@mediatek.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
+#include <linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
+	void __iomem *base;
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct mbox_controller mbox;
+	const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
+	struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
+};
+
+struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg {
+	u32 set_in;
+	u32 clr_out;
+};
+
+static inline struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(struct mbox_controller *mbox)
+{
+	return container_of(mbox, struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv, mbox);
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t mtk_vcp_mbox_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct mbox_chan *chan = data;
+	struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv = get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(chan->mbox);
+
+	/* get irq status */
+	priv->ipi_recv.irq_status = readl(priv->base + priv->cfg->clr_out);
+
+	__ioread32_copy(priv->ipi_recv.msg, priv->base, MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE / 4);
+
+	mbox_chan_received_data(chan, &priv->ipi_recv);
+
+	/* clear irq status */
+	writel(priv->ipi_recv.irq_status, priv->base + priv->cfg->clr_out);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static struct mbox_chan *mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
+					    const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
+{
+	if (sp->args_count)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return mbox->chans;
+}
+
+static int mtk_vcp_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
+{
+	struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv = get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(chan->mbox);
+	struct mtk_ipi_info *ipi_info = data;
+	u32 status;
+
+	if (!ipi_info->msg) {
+		dev_err(priv->dev, "msg buffer is NULL.\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	status = readl(priv->base + priv->cfg->set_in) & BIT(ipi_info->index);
+	if (status) {
+		dev_warn(priv->dev, "mailbox IPI %d is busy.\n", ipi_info->id);
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	if (ipi_info->slot_ofs + ipi_info->len > MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	__iowrite32_copy(priv->base + ipi_info->slot_ofs, ipi_info->msg,
+			 ipi_info->len);
+
+	writel(BIT(ipi_info->index), priv->base + priv->cfg->set_in);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool mtk_vcp_mbox_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+	struct mtk_ipi_info *ipi_info = chan->active_req;
+	struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv = get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(chan->mbox);
+
+	return !(readl(priv->base + priv->cfg->set_in) & BIT(ipi_info->index));
+}
+
+static const struct mbox_chan_ops mtk_vcp_mbox_chan_ops = {
+	.send_data	= mtk_vcp_mbox_send_data,
+	.last_tx_done	= mtk_vcp_mbox_last_tx_done,
+};
+
+static int mtk_vcp_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv;
+	struct mbox_controller *mbox;
+	int ret, irq;
+
+	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!priv)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->dev = dev;
+	mbox = &priv->mbox;
+	mbox->dev = dev;
+	mbox->ops = &mtk_vcp_mbox_chan_ops;
+	mbox->txdone_irq = false;
+	mbox->txdone_poll = true;
+	mbox->of_xlate = mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate;
+	mbox->num_chans = 1;
+	mbox->chans = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mbox->chans), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!mbox->chans)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->ipi_recv.msg = devm_kzalloc(dev, MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!priv->ipi_recv.msg)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
+		return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
+
+	priv->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!priv->cfg)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (irq < 0)
+		return irq;
+
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
+					mtk_vcp_mbox_irq_thread, IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					dev_name(dev), mbox->chans);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
+
+	return devm_mbox_controller_register(dev, &priv->mbox);
+}
+
+static const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg mt8196_cfg = {
+	.set_in		= 0x100,
+	.clr_out	= 0x10C,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id mtk_vcp_mbox_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8196-vcp-mbox", .data = &mt8196_cfg },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_vcp_mbox_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver mtk_vcp_mbox_driver = {
+	.probe		= mtk_vcp_mbox_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name	= "mtk_vcp_mbox",
+		.of_match_table = mtk_vcp_mbox_of_match,
+	},
+};
+module_platform_driver(mtk_vcp_mbox_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MTK VCP Mailbox Controller");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..143fb0d06e30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2025 MediaTek Inc.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __MTK_VCP_MAILBOX_H__
+#define __MTK_VCP_MAILBOX_H__
+
+#define MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE	0x100 /* mbox max slot size */
+
+/**
+ * struct mtk_ipi_info - mailbox message info for mtk-vcp-mailbox
+ * @msg: The share buffer between IPC and mailbox driver
+ * @len: Message length
+ * @id: This is for identification purposes and not actually used
+ *	by the mailbox hardware.
+ * @index: The signal number of the mailbox message.
+ * @slot_ofs: Data slot offset.
+ * @irq_status: Captures incoming signals for the RX path.
+ *
+ * It is used between IPC with mailbox driver.
+ */
+struct mtk_ipi_info {
+	void *msg;
+	u32 len;
+	u32 id;
+	u32 index;
+	u32 slot_ofs;
+	u32 irq_status;
+};
+
+#endif
--
2.46.0
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Jassi Brar 2 weeks, 1 day ago
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:12 PM Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com> wrote:

.....

> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
Maybe 'mtk_vcp_mbox' is a more appropriate name ?

> +       void __iomem *base;
> +       struct device *dev;
> +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;

Maybe also have "struct mbox_chan chan[1]; " so that you don't have to
allocate one during the probe.
Also if you have  "struct mbox_controller mbox;" as the first member,
you could simply typecast that to get this structure.
Something like "struct mpfs_mbox" in mailbox-mpfs.c

....
> +
> +static struct mbox_chan *mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
> +                                           const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
> +{
> +       if (sp->args_count)
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       return mbox->chans;

return &mbox->chans[0]   seems better.

thnx
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Jjian Zhou (周建) 1 week, 3 days ago
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 18:50 -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:12 PM Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
> wrote:
> 
> .....
> 
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
> 
> Maybe 'mtk_vcp_mbox' is a more appropriate name ?
> 
> > +       void __iomem *base;
> > +       struct device *dev;
> > +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> > +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> > +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
> 
> Maybe also have "struct mbox_chan chan[1]; " so that you don't have
> to
> allocate one during the probe.
> Also if you have  "struct mbox_controller mbox;" as the first member,
> you could simply typecast that to get this structure.
> Something like "struct mpfs_mbox" in mailbox-mpfs.c
> 


ERROR:FLEXIBLE_ARRAY: Use C99 flexible arrays - see 
https://docs.kernel.org/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
#81: FILE: drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c:24:
+       struct mbox_chan chans[1];
+};

Can we ignore this error?

> ....
> > +
> > +static struct mbox_chan *mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller
> > *mbox,
> > +                                           const struct
> > of_phandle_args *sp)
> > +{
> > +       if (sp->args_count)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       return mbox->chans;
> 
> return &mbox->chans[0]   seems better.
> 
> thnx
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Jassi Brar 1 week, 3 days ago
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 1:46 AM Jjian Zhou (周建) <Jjian.Zhou@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 18:50 -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> > you have verified the sender or the content.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:12 PM Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > .....
> >
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +
> > > +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
> >
> > Maybe 'mtk_vcp_mbox' is a more appropriate name ?
> >
> > > +       void __iomem *base;
> > > +       struct device *dev;
> > > +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> > > +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> > > +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
> >
> > Maybe also have "struct mbox_chan chan[1]; " so that you don't have
> > to
> > allocate one during the probe.
> > Also if you have  "struct mbox_controller mbox;" as the first member,
> > you could simply typecast that to get this structure.
> > Something like "struct mpfs_mbox" in mailbox-mpfs.c
> >
>
>
> ERROR:FLEXIBLE_ARRAY: Use C99 flexible arrays - see
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
> #81: FILE: drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c:24:
> +       struct mbox_chan chans[1];
> +};
>
> Can we ignore this error?
>
It seems single element style is deprecated. While we know what we are
doing, let us placate that error by
       struct mbox_chan mch;
       struct mbox_chan chans[];
and set  chans = &mch
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Jjian Zhou (周建) 1 week, 2 days ago
On Tue, 2025-09-23 at 08:11 -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 1:46 AM Jjian Zhou (周建) <
> Jjian.Zhou@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 18:50 -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments
> > > until
> > > you have verified the sender or the content.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:12 PM Jjian Zhou <
> > > jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > .....
> > > 
> > > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
> > > 
> > > Maybe 'mtk_vcp_mbox' is a more appropriate name ?
> > > 
> > > > +       void __iomem *base;
> > > > +       struct device *dev;
> > > > +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> > > > +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> > > > +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
> > > 
> > > Maybe also have "struct mbox_chan chan[1]; " so that you don't
> > > have
> > > to
> > > allocate one during the probe.
> > > Also if you have  "struct mbox_controller mbox;" as the first
> > > member,
> > > you could simply typecast that to get this structure.
> > > Something like "struct mpfs_mbox" in mailbox-mpfs.c
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > ERROR:FLEXIBLE_ARRAY: Use C99 flexible arrays - see
> > 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.kernel.org/process/deprecated.html*zero-length-and-one-element-arrays__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!kLlX71HetZwXMZ9UmdtvMEKKykbZINIUNVW5nLVfoztdkSJMlaa3QfbzZxGKIkSgqmHHc2Lvfwpj4URsOVCtekNCFh5L$
> > #81: FILE: drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c:24:
> > +       struct mbox_chan chans[1];
> > +};
> > 
> > Can we ignore this error?
> > 
> 
> It seems single element style is deprecated. While we know what we
> are
> doing, let us placate that error by
>        struct mbox_chan mch;
>        struct mbox_chan chans[];
> and set  chans = &mch

Do you have any specific considerations for suggesting this approach?
Wo
uld it be sufficient to just define a 'struct mbox_chan chans'?

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Jjian Zhou (周建) 1 week, 3 days ago
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 18:50 -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:12 PM Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
> wrote:
> 
> .....
> 
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
> 
> Maybe 'mtk_vcp_mbox' is a more appropriate name ?
> 
> > +       void __iomem *base;
> > +       struct device *dev;
> > +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> > +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> > +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
> 
> Maybe also have "struct mbox_chan chan[1]; " so that you don't have
> to
> allocate one during the probe.
> Also if you have  "struct mbox_controller mbox;" as the first member,
> you could simply typecast that to get this structure.
> Something like "struct mpfs_mbox" in mailbox-mpfs.c
> 

The define "struct mbox_chan chan[1]" has style error.
ERROR:FLEXIBLE_ARRAY: Use C99 flexible arrays - see 
https://docs.kernel.org/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
#81: FILE: drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c:24:
+       struct mbox_chan chans[0];
+};

How about this error?

> ....
> > +
> > +static struct mbox_chan *mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller
> > *mbox,
> > +                                           const struct
> > of_phandle_args *sp)
> > +{
> > +       if (sp->args_count)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       return mbox->chans;
> 
> return &mbox->chans[0]   seems better.
> 
> thnx
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Jjian Zhou (周建) 2 weeks ago
On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 18:50 -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:12 PM Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
> wrote:
> 
> .....
> 
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
> 
> Maybe 'mtk_vcp_mbox' is a more appropriate name ?

OK, I replace mtk_vcp_mbox_priv with mtk_vcp_mbox in the next version.

> 
> > +       void __iomem *base;
> > +       struct device *dev;
> > +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> > +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> > +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
> 
> Maybe also have "struct mbox_chan chan[1]; " so that you don't have
> to
> allocate one during the probe.
> Also if you have  "struct mbox_controller mbox;" as the first member,
> you could simply typecast that to get this structure.
> Something like "struct mpfs_mbox" in mailbox-mpfs.c
> 
> ....
> > +
> > +static struct mbox_chan *mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller
> > *mbox,
> > +                                           const struct
> > of_phandle_args *sp)
> > +{
> > +       if (sp->args_count)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       return mbox->chans;
> 
> return &mbox->chans[0]   seems better.

OK.

> 
> thnx
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Chen-Yu Tsai 2 weeks ago
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 7:50 AM Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:12 PM Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> .....
>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
> Maybe 'mtk_vcp_mbox' is a more appropriate name ?
>
> > +       void __iomem *base;
> > +       struct device *dev;
> > +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> > +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> > +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
>
> Maybe also have "struct mbox_chan chan[1]; " so that you don't have to
> allocate one during the probe.

> Also if you have  "struct mbox_controller mbox;" as the first member,
> you could simply typecast that to get this structure.
> Something like "struct mpfs_mbox" in mailbox-mpfs.c

I read somewhere that this way of subclassing is not recommended.
Instead the base class should explicitly not be the first member.
And then container_of() should be used.

I don't remember where I read this though. But I think the explicit
container_of() is easier for understanding the intent.

ChenYu

> ....
> > +
> > +static struct mbox_chan *mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
> > +                                           const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
> > +{
> > +       if (sp->args_count)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       return mbox->chans;
>
> return &mbox->chans[0]   seems better.
>
> thnx
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Jassi Brar 2 weeks ago
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 3:31 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 7:50 AM Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:12 PM Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > .....
> >
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +
> > > +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
> > Maybe 'mtk_vcp_mbox' is a more appropriate name ?
> >
> > > +       void __iomem *base;
> > > +       struct device *dev;
> > > +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> > > +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> > > +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
> >
> > Maybe also have "struct mbox_chan chan[1]; " so that you don't have to
> > allocate one during the probe.
>
> > Also if you have  "struct mbox_controller mbox;" as the first member,
> > you could simply typecast that to get this structure.
> > Something like "struct mpfs_mbox" in mailbox-mpfs.c
>
> I read somewhere that this way of subclassing is not recommended.
> Instead the base class should explicitly not be the first member.
> And then container_of() should be used.
>
> I don't remember where I read this though. But I think the explicit
> container_of() is easier for understanding the intent.
>
And how does container_of() work ? :)
typcasting the first member to its parent is the simplest form of container_of.

-j
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Chen-Yu Tsai 1 month, 1 week ago
On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:12 AM Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver to support the communication with
> VCP remote microprocessor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>

Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>

A couple minor comments below.

> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/Kconfig                 |   9 ++
>  drivers/mailbox/Makefile                |   2 +
>  drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c       | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h |  32 +++++
>  4 files changed, 217 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> index 02432d4a5ccd..c28bdb855663 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> @@ -294,6 +294,15 @@ config MTK_CMDQ_MBOX
>           critical time limitation, such as updating display configuration
>           during the vblank.
>
> +config MTK_VCP_MBOX
> +       tristate "MediaTek VCP Mailbox Support"
> +       depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
> +       help
> +         Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek VCP mailbox driver.
> +         The mailbox implementation provides access from the application
> +         processor to Video Companion Processor Unit.
> +         If unsure say N.
> +
>  config ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
>         tristate "Xilinx ZynqMP IPI Mailbox"
>         depends on ARCH_ZYNQMP && OF
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> index 98a68f838486..07278871d254 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_ADSP_MBOX)   += mtk-adsp-mailbox.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ_MBOX)    += mtk-cmdq-mailbox.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_VCP_MBOX)     += mtk-vcp-mailbox.o
> +
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX)  += zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SUN6I_MSGBOX)     += sun6i-msgbox.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6f48215896d2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2025 MediaTek Corporation. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou.@mediatek.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
> +       void __iomem *base;
> +       struct device *dev;
> +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
> +};
> +
> +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg {
> +       u32 set_in;
> +       u32 clr_out;
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(struct mbox_controller *mbox)
> +{
> +       return container_of(mbox, struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv, mbox);
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t mtk_vcp_mbox_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> +       struct mbox_chan *chan = data;
> +       struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv = get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(chan->mbox);

Since there's only one mailbox, you can just pass the private data,
instead of passing the mbox_chan.

> +
> +       /* get irq status */
> +       priv->ipi_recv.irq_status = readl(priv->base + priv->cfg->clr_out);
> +
> +       __ioread32_copy(priv->ipi_recv.msg, priv->base, MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE / 4);
> +
> +       mbox_chan_received_data(chan, &priv->ipi_recv);
> +
> +       /* clear irq status */
> +       writel(priv->ipi_recv.irq_status, priv->base + priv->cfg->clr_out);
> +
> +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static struct mbox_chan *mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
> +                                           const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
> +{
> +       if (sp->args_count)
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       return mbox->chans;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_vcp_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> +       struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv = get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(chan->mbox);
> +       struct mtk_ipi_info *ipi_info = data;
> +       u32 status;
> +
> +       if (!ipi_info->msg) {
> +               dev_err(priv->dev, "msg buffer is NULL.\n");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       status = readl(priv->base + priv->cfg->set_in) & BIT(ipi_info->index);
> +       if (status) {
> +               dev_warn(priv->dev, "mailbox IPI %d is busy.\n", ipi_info->id);
> +               return -EBUSY;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (ipi_info->slot_ofs + ipi_info->len > MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       __iowrite32_copy(priv->base + ipi_info->slot_ofs, ipi_info->msg,
> +                        ipi_info->len);
> +
> +       writel(BIT(ipi_info->index), priv->base + priv->cfg->set_in);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool mtk_vcp_mbox_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +       struct mtk_ipi_info *ipi_info = chan->active_req;
> +       struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv = get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(chan->mbox);
> +
> +       return !(readl(priv->base + priv->cfg->set_in) & BIT(ipi_info->index));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mbox_chan_ops mtk_vcp_mbox_chan_ops = {
> +       .send_data      = mtk_vcp_mbox_send_data,
> +       .last_tx_done   = mtk_vcp_mbox_last_tx_done,
> +};
> +
> +static int mtk_vcp_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +       struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv;
> +       struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> +       int ret, irq;
> +
> +       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!priv)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       priv->dev = dev;
> +       mbox = &priv->mbox;
> +       mbox->dev = dev;
> +       mbox->ops = &mtk_vcp_mbox_chan_ops;
> +       mbox->txdone_irq = false;
> +       mbox->txdone_poll = true;
> +       mbox->of_xlate = mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate;
> +       mbox->num_chans = 1;
> +       mbox->chans = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mbox->chans), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!mbox->chans)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       priv->ipi_recv.msg = devm_kzalloc(dev, MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!priv->ipi_recv.msg)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +       if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> +               return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> +
> +       priv->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +       if (!priv->cfg)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +       if (irq < 0)
> +               return irq;
> +
> +       ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
> +                                       mtk_vcp_mbox_irq_thread, IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +                                       dev_name(dev), mbox->chans);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> +
> +       return devm_mbox_controller_register(dev, &priv->mbox);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg mt8196_cfg = {
> +       .set_in         = 0x100,
> +       .clr_out        = 0x10C,

                                ^ use lowercase for hex numbers.

> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_vcp_mbox_of_match[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8196-vcp-mbox", .data = &mt8196_cfg },
> +       {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_vcp_mbox_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver mtk_vcp_mbox_driver = {
> +       .probe          = mtk_vcp_mbox_probe,
> +       .driver = {
> +               .name   = "mtk_vcp_mbox",
> +               .of_match_table = mtk_vcp_mbox_of_match,
> +       },
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(mtk_vcp_mbox_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MTK VCP Mailbox Controller");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..143fb0d06e30
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2025 MediaTek Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __MTK_VCP_MAILBOX_H__
> +#define __MTK_VCP_MAILBOX_H__
> +
> +#define MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE     0x100 /* mbox max slot size */
> +
> +/**
> + * struct mtk_ipi_info - mailbox message info for mtk-vcp-mailbox
> + * @msg: The share buffer between IPC and mailbox driver
> + * @len: Message length
> + * @id: This is for identification purposes and not actually used
> + *     by the mailbox hardware.
> + * @index: The signal number of the mailbox message.
> + * @slot_ofs: Data slot offset.
> + * @irq_status: Captures incoming signals for the RX path.
> + *
> + * It is used between IPC with mailbox driver.
> + */
> +struct mtk_ipi_info {
> +       void *msg;
> +       u32 len;
> +       u32 id;
> +       u32 index;
> +       u32 slot_ofs;
> +       u32 irq_status;
> +};
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.46.0
>
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
Posted by Jjian Zhou (周建) 1 week, 4 days ago
On Fri, 2025-08-22 at 13:48 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:12 AM Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver to support the communication with
> > VCP remote microprocessor.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
> 
> A couple minor comments below.
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/mailbox/Kconfig                 |   9 ++
> >  drivers/mailbox/Makefile                |   2 +
> >  drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c       | 174
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h |  32 +++++
> >  4 files changed, 217 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> > index 02432d4a5ccd..c28bdb855663 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> > @@ -294,6 +294,15 @@ config MTK_CMDQ_MBOX
> >           critical time limitation, such as updating display
> > configuration
> >           during the vblank.
> > 
> > +config MTK_VCP_MBOX
> > +       tristate "MediaTek VCP Mailbox Support"
> > +       depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
> > +       help
> > +         Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek VCP mailbox
> > driver.
> > +         The mailbox implementation provides access from the
> > application
> > +         processor to Video Companion Processor Unit.
> > +         If unsure say N.
> > +
> >  config ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
> >         tristate "Xilinx ZynqMP IPI Mailbox"
> >         depends on ARCH_ZYNQMP && OF
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> > index 98a68f838486..07278871d254 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> > @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_ADSP_MBOX)   += mtk-adsp-
> > mailbox.o
> > 
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ_MBOX)    += mtk-cmdq-mailbox.o
> > 
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_VCP_MBOX)     += mtk-vcp-mailbox.o
> > +
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX)  += zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.o
> > 
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SUN6I_MSGBOX)     += sun6i-msgbox.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
> > b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..6f48215896d2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2025 MediaTek Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + * Author: Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou.@mediatek.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> > +#include <linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {
> > +       void __iomem *base;
> > +       struct device *dev;
> > +       struct mbox_controller mbox;
> > +       const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg;
> > +       struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg {
> > +       u32 set_in;
> > +       u32 clr_out;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv
> > *get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(struct mbox_controller *mbox)
> > +{
> > +       return container_of(mbox, struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv, mbox);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t mtk_vcp_mbox_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> > +{
> > +       struct mbox_chan *chan = data;
> > +       struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv =
> > get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(chan->mbox);
> 
> Since there's only one mailbox, you can just pass the private data,
> instead of passing the mbox_chan.

I got it. Modification like below:

struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv = data;
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
                                mtk_vcp_mbox_irq_thread, IRQF_ONESHOT,
                                dev_name(dev), priv);

> 
> > +
> > +       /* get irq status */
> > +       priv->ipi_recv.irq_status = readl(priv->base + priv->cfg-
> > >clr_out);
> > +
> > +       __ioread32_copy(priv->ipi_recv.msg, priv->base,
> > MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE / 4);
> > +
> > +       mbox_chan_received_data(chan, &priv->ipi_recv);
> > +
> > +       /* clear irq status */
> > +       writel(priv->ipi_recv.irq_status, priv->base + priv->cfg-
> > >clr_out);
> > +
> > +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct mbox_chan *mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller
> > *mbox,
> > +                                           const struct
> > of_phandle_args *sp)
> > +{
> > +       if (sp->args_count)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       return mbox->chans;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mtk_vcp_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void
> > *data)
> > +{
> > +       struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv =
> > get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(chan->mbox);
> > +       struct mtk_ipi_info *ipi_info = data;
> > +       u32 status;
> > +
> > +       if (!ipi_info->msg) {
> > +               dev_err(priv->dev, "msg buffer is NULL.\n");
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       status = readl(priv->base + priv->cfg->set_in) &
> > BIT(ipi_info->index);
> > +       if (status) {
> > +               dev_warn(priv->dev, "mailbox IPI %d is busy.\n",
> > ipi_info->id);
> > +               return -EBUSY;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (ipi_info->slot_ofs + ipi_info->len >
> > MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       __iowrite32_copy(priv->base + ipi_info->slot_ofs, ipi_info-
> > >msg,
> > +                        ipi_info->len);
> > +
> > +       writel(BIT(ipi_info->index), priv->base + priv->cfg-
> > >set_in);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool mtk_vcp_mbox_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> > +{
> > +       struct mtk_ipi_info *ipi_info = chan->active_req;
> > +       struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv =
> > get_mtk_vcp_mbox_priv(chan->mbox);
> > +
> > +       return !(readl(priv->base + priv->cfg->set_in) &
> > BIT(ipi_info->index));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct mbox_chan_ops mtk_vcp_mbox_chan_ops = {
> > +       .send_data      = mtk_vcp_mbox_send_data,
> > +       .last_tx_done   = mtk_vcp_mbox_last_tx_done,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int mtk_vcp_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +       struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv *priv;
> > +       struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> > +       int ret, irq;
> > +
> > +       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       if (!priv)
> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +       priv->dev = dev;
> > +       mbox = &priv->mbox;
> > +       mbox->dev = dev;
> > +       mbox->ops = &mtk_vcp_mbox_chan_ops;
> > +       mbox->txdone_irq = false;
> > +       mbox->txdone_poll = true;
> > +       mbox->of_xlate = mtk_vcp_mbox_xlate;
> > +       mbox->num_chans = 1;
> > +       mbox->chans = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mbox->chans),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       if (!mbox->chans)
> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +       priv->ipi_recv.msg = devm_kzalloc(dev, MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       if (!priv->ipi_recv.msg)
> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +       priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> > +               return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> > +
> > +       priv->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +       if (!priv->cfg)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +       if (irq < 0)
> > +               return irq;
> > +
> > +       ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
> > +                                       mtk_vcp_mbox_irq_thread,
> > IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > +                                       dev_name(dev), mbox-
> > >chans);
> > +       if (ret < 0)
> > +               return ret;
> > +
> > +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> > +
> > +       return devm_mbox_controller_register(dev, &priv->mbox);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg mt8196_cfg = {
> > +       .set_in         = 0x100,
> > +       .clr_out        = 0x10C,
> 
>                                 ^ use lowercase for hex numbers.

Thanks.

> 
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_vcp_mbox_of_match[] = {
> > +       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8196-vcp-mbox", .data =
> > &mt8196_cfg },
> > +       {},
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_vcp_mbox_of_match);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver mtk_vcp_mbox_driver = {
> > +       .probe          = mtk_vcp_mbox_probe,
> > +       .driver = {
> > +               .name   = "mtk_vcp_mbox",
> > +               .of_match_table = mtk_vcp_mbox_of_match,
> > +       },
> > +};
> > +module_platform_driver(mtk_vcp_mbox_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MTK VCP Mailbox Controller");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h
> > b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..143fb0d06e30
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-vcp-mailbox.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2025 MediaTek Inc.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __MTK_VCP_MAILBOX_H__
> > +#define __MTK_VCP_MAILBOX_H__
> > +
> > +#define MBOX_SLOT_MAX_SIZE     0x100 /* mbox max slot size */
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct mtk_ipi_info - mailbox message info for mtk-vcp-mailbox
> > + * @msg: The share buffer between IPC and mailbox driver
> > + * @len: Message length
> > + * @id: This is for identification purposes and not actually used
> > + *     by the mailbox hardware.
> > + * @index: The signal number of the mailbox message.
> > + * @slot_ofs: Data slot offset.
> > + * @irq_status: Captures incoming signals for the RX path.
> > + *
> > + * It is used between IPC with mailbox driver.
> > + */
> > +struct mtk_ipi_info {
> > +       void *msg;
> > +       u32 len;
> > +       u32 id;
> > +       u32 index;
> > +       u32 slot_ofs;
> > +       u32 irq_status;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#endif
> > --
> > 2.46.0
> >