drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
This adds SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_DISABLE_HS400 quirk which shall be used
to disable HS400 support. AM62P SR1.0 and SR1.1 do not support HS400
due to errata i2458 [0] so disable HS400 for these SoC revisions.
[0] https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz574a/sprz574a.pdf
Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---
This patch was separated from [1] since it will be merged to
different trees anyways.
Links:
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20250818203310.3066985-1-jm@ti.com/
v2: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20250807225138.1228333-1-jm@ti.com
Changes since v3:
- Add Andrew's and Adrian's tags
- Fix message to user as per Andrew's and Adrian's suggestion
in v3 to a less imperative tone
- Fix commit message reference indexes
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
index 8a099508b939..ffc45930c240 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ struct sdhci_am654_data {
#define SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_FORCE_CDTEST BIT(0)
#define SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_SUPPRESS_V1P8_ENA BIT(1)
+#define SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_DISABLE_HS400 BIT(2)
};
struct window {
@@ -764,6 +765,7 @@ static int sdhci_am654_init(struct sdhci_host *host)
{
struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
struct sdhci_am654_data *sdhci_am654 = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
+ struct device *dev = mmc_dev(host->mmc);
u32 ctl_cfg_2 = 0;
u32 mask;
u32 val;
@@ -819,6 +821,12 @@ static int sdhci_am654_init(struct sdhci_host *host)
if (ret)
goto err_cleanup_host;
+ if (sdhci_am654->quirks & SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_DISABLE_HS400 &&
+ host->mmc->caps2 & (MMC_CAP2_HS400 | MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES)) {
+ dev_info(dev, "HS400 mode not supported on this silicon revision, disabling it\n");
+ host->mmc->caps2 &= ~(MMC_CAP2_HS400 | MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES);
+ }
+
ret = __sdhci_add_host(host);
if (ret)
goto err_cleanup_host;
@@ -882,6 +890,12 @@ static int sdhci_am654_get_of_property(struct platform_device *pdev,
return 0;
}
+static const struct soc_device_attribute sdhci_am654_descope_hs400[] = {
+ { .family = "AM62PX", .revision = "SR1.0" },
+ { .family = "AM62PX", .revision = "SR1.1" },
+ { /* sentinel */ }
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id sdhci_am654_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = "ti,am654-sdhci-5.1",
@@ -969,6 +983,10 @@ static int sdhci_am654_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "parsing dt failed\n");
+ soc = soc_device_match(sdhci_am654_descope_hs400);
+ if (soc)
+ sdhci_am654->quirks |= SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_DISABLE_HS400;
+
host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch = sdhci_am654_start_signal_voltage_switch;
host->mmc_host_ops.execute_tuning = sdhci_am654_execute_tuning;
--
2.49.0
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 17:28, Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com> wrote: > > This adds SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_DISABLE_HS400 quirk which shall be used > to disable HS400 support. AM62P SR1.0 and SR1.1 do not support HS400 > due to errata i2458 [0] so disable HS400 for these SoC revisions. > > [0] https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz574a/sprz574a.pdf > Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> > Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Can we add a fixes tag? And should this be tagged for stable too? Kind regards Uffe > --- > This patch was separated from [1] since it will be merged to > different trees anyways. > > Links: > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20250818203310.3066985-1-jm@ti.com/ > v2: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20250807225138.1228333-1-jm@ti.com > > Changes since v3: > - Add Andrew's and Adrian's tags > - Fix message to user as per Andrew's and Adrian's suggestion > in v3 to a less imperative tone > - Fix commit message reference indexes > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c > index 8a099508b939..ffc45930c240 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c > @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ struct sdhci_am654_data { > > #define SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_FORCE_CDTEST BIT(0) > #define SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_SUPPRESS_V1P8_ENA BIT(1) > +#define SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_DISABLE_HS400 BIT(2) > }; > > struct window { > @@ -764,6 +765,7 @@ static int sdhci_am654_init(struct sdhci_host *host) > { > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); > struct sdhci_am654_data *sdhci_am654 = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); > + struct device *dev = mmc_dev(host->mmc); > u32 ctl_cfg_2 = 0; > u32 mask; > u32 val; > @@ -819,6 +821,12 @@ static int sdhci_am654_init(struct sdhci_host *host) > if (ret) > goto err_cleanup_host; > > + if (sdhci_am654->quirks & SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_DISABLE_HS400 && > + host->mmc->caps2 & (MMC_CAP2_HS400 | MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES)) { > + dev_info(dev, "HS400 mode not supported on this silicon revision, disabling it\n"); > + host->mmc->caps2 &= ~(MMC_CAP2_HS400 | MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES); > + } > + > ret = __sdhci_add_host(host); > if (ret) > goto err_cleanup_host; > @@ -882,6 +890,12 @@ static int sdhci_am654_get_of_property(struct platform_device *pdev, > return 0; > } > > +static const struct soc_device_attribute sdhci_am654_descope_hs400[] = { > + { .family = "AM62PX", .revision = "SR1.0" }, > + { .family = "AM62PX", .revision = "SR1.1" }, > + { /* sentinel */ } > +}; > + > static const struct of_device_id sdhci_am654_of_match[] = { > { > .compatible = "ti,am654-sdhci-5.1", > @@ -969,6 +983,10 @@ static int sdhci_am654_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "parsing dt failed\n"); > > + soc = soc_device_match(sdhci_am654_descope_hs400); > + if (soc) > + sdhci_am654->quirks |= SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_DISABLE_HS400; > + > host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch = sdhci_am654_start_signal_voltage_switch; > host->mmc_host_ops.execute_tuning = sdhci_am654_execute_tuning; > > -- > 2.49.0 >
Hi Ulf, On 8/20/25 11:11 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 17:28, Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com> wrote: >> >> This adds SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_DISABLE_HS400 quirk which shall be used >> to disable HS400 support. AM62P SR1.0 and SR1.1 do not support HS400 >> due to errata i2458 [0] so disable HS400 for these SoC revisions. >> >> [0] https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz574a/sprz574a.pdf >> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com> >> Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> >> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> > > Can we add a fixes tag? And should this be tagged for stable too? Sure I can add and respin. ~ Judith ...
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.