[PATCH v15 12/13] drm/msm/dpu: support plane splitting in quad-pipe case

Jun Nie posted 13 patches 2 weeks, 5 days ago
[PATCH v15 12/13] drm/msm/dpu: support plane splitting in quad-pipe case
Posted by Jun Nie 2 weeks, 5 days ago
The content of every half of screen is sent out via one interface in
dual-DSI case. The content for every interface is blended by a LM
pair in quad-pipe case, thus a LM pair should not blend any content
that cross the half of screen in this case. Clip plane into pipes per
left and right half screen ROI if topology is quad pipe case.

The clipped rectangle on every half of screen is futher handled by two
pipes if its width exceeds a limit for a single pipe.

Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c  |  11 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h  |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
index c7dc5b47ae18ebd78de30d2a0605caa7dd547850..1c7a5e545745320018c3e9a2d163cbfd3dceaf7b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
@@ -1592,6 +1592,17 @@ int dpu_crtc_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool en)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * dpu_crtc_get_num_lm - Get mixer number in this CRTC pipeline
+ * @state: Pointer to drm crtc state object
+ */
+unsigned int dpu_crtc_get_num_lm(const struct drm_crtc_state *state)
+{
+	struct dpu_crtc_state *cstate = to_dpu_crtc_state(state);
+
+	return cstate->num_mixers;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 static int _dpu_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
index 94392b9b924546f96e738ae20920cf9afd568e6b..6eaba5696e8e6bd1246a9895c4c8714ca6589b10 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
@@ -267,4 +267,6 @@ static inline enum dpu_crtc_client_type dpu_crtc_get_client_type(
 
 void dpu_crtc_frame_event_cb(struct drm_crtc *crtc, u32 event);
 
+unsigned int dpu_crtc_get_num_lm(const struct drm_crtc_state *state);
+
 #endif /* _DPU_CRTC_H_ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
index 99c902dfa7e0256028d294113a3e9bad0e1a0069..634d9354edf2c4ec28cdef32de118ae49a0ec7a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
@@ -824,8 +824,12 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
 	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg;
 	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg init_pipe_cfg;
 	struct drm_rect fb_rect = { 0 };
+	const struct drm_display_mode *mode = &crtc_state->adjusted_mode;
 	uint32_t max_linewidth;
+	u32 num_lm;
+	int stage_id, num_stages;
 
 	min_scale = FRAC_16_16(1, MAX_UPSCALE_RATIO);
 	max_scale = MAX_DOWNSCALE_RATIO << 16;
@@ -848,13 +852,10 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	/* move the assignment here, to ease handling to another pairs later */
-	pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
-	r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
-	/* state->src is 16.16, src_rect is not */
-	drm_rect_fp_to_int(&pipe_cfg->src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
+	num_lm = dpu_crtc_get_num_lm(crtc_state);
 
-	pipe_cfg->dst_rect = new_plane_state->dst;
+	/* state->src is 16.16, src_rect is not */
+	drm_rect_fp_to_int(&init_pipe_cfg.src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
 
 	fb_rect.x2 = new_plane_state->fb->width;
 	fb_rect.y2 = new_plane_state->fb->height;
@@ -879,35 +880,94 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 
 	max_linewidth = pdpu->catalog->caps->max_linewidth;
 
-	drm_rect_rotate(&pipe_cfg->src_rect,
+	drm_rect_rotate(&init_pipe_cfg.src_rect,
 			new_plane_state->fb->width, new_plane_state->fb->height,
 			new_plane_state->rotation);
 
-	if ((drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) > max_linewidth) ||
-	     _dpu_plane_calc_clk(&crtc_state->adjusted_mode, pipe_cfg) > max_mdp_clk_rate) {
-		if (drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) > 2 * max_linewidth) {
-			DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "invalid src " DRM_RECT_FMT " line:%u\n",
-					DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect), max_linewidth);
-			return -E2BIG;
+	/*
+	 * We have 1 mixer pair cfg for 1:1:1 and 2:2:1 topology, 2 mixer pair
+	 * configs for left and right half screen in case of 4:4:2 topology.
+	 * But we may have 2 rect to split wide plane that exceeds limit with 1
+	 * config for 2:2:1. So need to handle both wide plane splitting, and
+	 * two halves of screen splitting for quad-pipe case. Check dest
+	 * rectangle left/right clipping first, then check wide rectangle
+	 * splitting in every half next.
+	 */
+	num_stages = (num_lm + 1) / 2;
+	/* iterate mixer configs for this plane, to separate left/right with the id */
+	for (stage_id = 0; stage_id < num_stages; stage_id++) {
+		struct drm_rect mixer_rect = {
+			.x1 = stage_id * mode->hdisplay / num_stages,
+			.y1 = 0,
+			.x2 = (stage_id + 1) * mode->hdisplay / num_stages,
+			.y2 = mode->vdisplay
+			};
+		int cfg_idx = stage_id * PIPES_PER_STAGE;
+
+		pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[cfg_idx];
+		r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[cfg_idx + 1];
+
+		drm_rect_fp_to_int(&pipe_cfg->src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
+		pipe_cfg->dst_rect = new_plane_state->dst;
+
+		DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "checking src " DRM_RECT_FMT
+				" vs clip window " DRM_RECT_FMT "\n",
+				DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect),
+				DRM_RECT_ARG(&mixer_rect));
+
+		/*
+		 * If this plane does not fall into mixer rect, check next
+		 * mixer rect.
+		 */
+		if (!drm_rect_clip_scaled(&pipe_cfg->src_rect,
+					  &pipe_cfg->dst_rect,
+					  &mixer_rect)) {
+			memset(pipe_cfg, 0, 2 * sizeof(struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg));
+
+			continue;
 		}
 
-		*r_pipe_cfg = *pipe_cfg;
-		pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2 = (pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 + pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2) >> 1;
-		pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2 = (pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 + pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2) >> 1;
-		r_pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 = pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2;
-		r_pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 = pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2;
-	} else {
-		memset(r_pipe_cfg, 0, sizeof(*r_pipe_cfg));
-	}
+		pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 -= mixer_rect.x1;
+		pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2 -= mixer_rect.x1;
+
+		DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "Got clip src:" DRM_RECT_FMT " dst: " DRM_RECT_FMT "\n",
+				DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect), DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->dst_rect));
+
+		/* Split wide rect into 2 rect */
+		if ((drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) > max_linewidth) ||
+		     _dpu_plane_calc_clk(mode, pipe_cfg) > max_mdp_clk_rate) {
+
+			if (drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) > 2 * max_linewidth) {
+				DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "invalid src " DRM_RECT_FMT " line:%u\n",
+						DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect), max_linewidth);
+				return -E2BIG;
+			}
+
+			memcpy(r_pipe_cfg, pipe_cfg, sizeof(struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg));
+			pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2 = (pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 + pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2) >> 1;
+			pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2 = (pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 + pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2) >> 1;
+			r_pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 = pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2;
+			r_pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 = pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2;
+			DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "Split wide plane into:"
+					DRM_RECT_FMT " and " DRM_RECT_FMT "\n",
+					DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect),
+					DRM_RECT_ARG(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect));
+		} else {
+			memset(r_pipe_cfg, 0, sizeof(struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg));
+		}
 
-	drm_rect_rotate_inv(&pipe_cfg->src_rect,
-			    new_plane_state->fb->width, new_plane_state->fb->height,
-			    new_plane_state->rotation);
-	if (drm_rect_width(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect) != 0)
-		drm_rect_rotate_inv(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect,
-				    new_plane_state->fb->width, new_plane_state->fb->height,
+		drm_rect_rotate_inv(&pipe_cfg->src_rect,
+				    new_plane_state->fb->width,
+				    new_plane_state->fb->height,
 				    new_plane_state->rotation);
 
+		if (drm_rect_width(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect) != 0)
+			drm_rect_rotate_inv(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect,
+					    new_plane_state->fb->width,
+					    new_plane_state->fb->height,
+					    new_plane_state->rotation);
+	}
+
 	pstate->needs_qos_remap = drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -983,20 +1043,17 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_sspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 		drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state(state, plane);
 	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe[0];
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->pipe[1];
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, pipe, pipe_cfg,
-					  &crtc_state->adjusted_mode,
-					  new_plane_state);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg;
+	int ret = 0, i;
 
-	if (drm_rect_width(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect) != 0) {
-		ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, r_pipe, r_pipe_cfg,
+	for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_PLANE; i++) {
+		pipe = &pstate->pipe[i];
+		pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[i];
+		if (!pipe->sspp)
+			continue;
+		DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "pipe %d is in use, validate it\n", i);
+		ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, pipe, pipe_cfg,
 						  &crtc_state->adjusted_mode,
 						  new_plane_state);
 		if (ret)

-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v15 12/13] drm/msm/dpu: support plane splitting in quad-pipe case
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 3 days, 18 hours ago
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 09:31:06AM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> The content of every half of screen is sent out via one interface in
> dual-DSI case. The content for every interface is blended by a LM
> pair in quad-pipe case, thus a LM pair should not blend any content
> that cross the half of screen in this case. Clip plane into pipes per
> left and right half screen ROI if topology is quad pipe case.
> 
> The clipped rectangle on every half of screen is futher handled by two
> pipes if its width exceeds a limit for a single pipe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

I've run several CI workloads. This is the first commit which breaks IGT
tests. See https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/pipelines/1503075

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c  |  11 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h  |   2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
Re: [PATCH v15 12/13] drm/msm/dpu: support plane splitting in quad-pipe case
Posted by Jun Nie 2 days, 12 hours ago
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> 于2025年9月3日周三 17:39写道:
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 09:31:06AM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > The content of every half of screen is sent out via one interface in
> > dual-DSI case. The content for every interface is blended by a LM
> > pair in quad-pipe case, thus a LM pair should not blend any content
> > that cross the half of screen in this case. Clip plane into pipes per
> > left and right half screen ROI if topology is quad pipe case.
> >
> > The clipped rectangle on every half of screen is futher handled by two
> > pipes if its width exceeds a limit for a single pipe.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>
> I've run several CI workloads. This is the first commit which breaks IGT
> tests. See https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/pipelines/1503075

Thanks for the work! I did test locally with all my patch set on sm8650 and
did not reproduce the issue. The baseline is not aligned with msm-next-lumag
yet because I need to port my platform patches to it. I will do it tomorrow.
 Do you think this issue is related to difference of sm8650 and sm8350?
Regarding all failure cases are write back related.

- Jun

>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c  |  11 +++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h  |   2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Re: [PATCH v15 12/13] drm/msm/dpu: support plane splitting in quad-pipe case
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 2 days, 11 hours ago
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 12:09:52AM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> 于2025年9月3日周三 17:39写道:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 09:31:06AM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > > The content of every half of screen is sent out via one interface in
> > > dual-DSI case. The content for every interface is blended by a LM
> > > pair in quad-pipe case, thus a LM pair should not blend any content
> > > that cross the half of screen in this case. Clip plane into pipes per
> > > left and right half screen ROI if topology is quad pipe case.
> > >
> > > The clipped rectangle on every half of screen is futher handled by two
> > > pipes if its width exceeds a limit for a single pipe.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> >
> > I've run several CI workloads. This is the first commit which breaks IGT
> > tests. See https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/pipelines/1503075
> 
> Thanks for the work! I did test locally with all my patch set on sm8650 and
> did not reproduce the issue. The baseline is not aligned with msm-next-lumag
> yet because I need to port my platform patches to it. I will do it tomorrow.
>  Do you think this issue is related to difference of sm8650 and sm8350?
> Regarding all failure cases are write back related.

First of all, It's not only about SM8350. Tests also fail on SC7180.

Second, it's not about write back. I see various test failures. Please
rerun the test suite with virtual planes being disabled on SM8650 HDK.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry