[PATCH] net: openvswitch: Use for_each_cpu() where appropriate

Yury Norov posted 1 patch 1 month, 2 weeks ago
net/openvswitch/flow.c       | 12 ++++--------
net/openvswitch/flow_table.c |  7 +++----
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
[PATCH] net: openvswitch: Use for_each_cpu() where appropriate
Posted by Yury Norov 1 month, 2 weeks ago
From: "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@gmail.com>

Due to legacy reasons, openswitch code opencodes for_each_cpu() to make
sure that CPU0 is always considered.

Since commit c4b2bf6b4a35 ("openvswitch: Optimize operations for OvS
flow_stats."), the corresponding  flow->cpu_used_mask is initialized
such that CPU0 is explicitly set.

So, switch the code to using plain for_each_cpu().

Suggested-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov (NVIDIA) <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
 net/openvswitch/flow.c       | 12 ++++--------
 net/openvswitch/flow_table.c |  7 +++----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250814195838.388693-1-yury.norov@gmail.com/
v2:
 - always include CPU0 (Ilya);

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.c b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
index b80bd3a90773..66366982f604 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
@@ -129,15 +129,13 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_get(const struct sw_flow *flow,
 			struct ovs_flow_stats *ovs_stats,
 			unsigned long *used, __be16 *tcp_flags)
 {
-	int cpu;
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
 	*used = 0;
 	*tcp_flags = 0;
 	memset(ovs_stats, 0, sizeof(*ovs_stats));
 
-	/* We open code this to make sure cpu 0 is always considered */
-	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids;
-	     cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, flow->cpu_used_mask)) {
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, flow->cpu_used_mask) {
 		struct sw_flow_stats *stats = rcu_dereference_ovsl(flow->stats[cpu]);
 
 		if (stats) {
@@ -158,11 +156,9 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_get(const struct sw_flow *flow,
 /* Called with ovs_mutex. */
 void ovs_flow_stats_clear(struct sw_flow *flow)
 {
-	int cpu;
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
-	/* We open code this to make sure cpu 0 is always considered */
-	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids;
-	     cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, flow->cpu_used_mask)) {
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, flow->cpu_used_mask) {
 		struct sw_flow_stats *stats = ovsl_dereference(flow->stats[cpu]);
 
 		if (stats) {
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index d108ae0bd0ee..ffc72a741a50 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -107,16 +107,15 @@ int ovs_flow_tbl_count(const struct flow_table *table)
 
 static void flow_free(struct sw_flow *flow)
 {
-	int cpu;
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
 	if (ovs_identifier_is_key(&flow->id))
 		kfree(flow->id.unmasked_key);
 	if (flow->sf_acts)
 		ovs_nla_free_flow_actions((struct sw_flow_actions __force *)
 					  flow->sf_acts);
-	/* We open code this to make sure cpu 0 is always considered */
-	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids;
-	     cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, flow->cpu_used_mask)) {
+
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, flow->cpu_used_mask) {
 		if (flow->stats[cpu])
 			kmem_cache_free(flow_stats_cache,
 					(struct sw_flow_stats __force *)flow->stats[cpu]);
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH] net: openvswitch: Use for_each_cpu() where appropriate
Posted by Ilya Maximets 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On 8/18/25 7:28 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> From: "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> 
> Due to legacy reasons, openswitch code opencodes for_each_cpu() to make
> sure that CPU0 is always considered.
> 
> Since commit c4b2bf6b4a35 ("openvswitch: Optimize operations for OvS
> flow_stats."), the corresponding  flow->cpu_used_mask is initialized
> such that CPU0 is explicitly set.
> 
> So, switch the code to using plain for_each_cpu().
> 
> Suggested-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov (NVIDIA) <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/openvswitch/flow.c       | 12 ++++--------
>  net/openvswitch/flow_table.c |  7 +++----
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250814195838.388693-1-yury.norov@gmail.com/
> v2:
>  - always include CPU0 (Ilya);

nit: The subject prefix should've been [PATCH net-next v2].

The change itself looks correct to me.  Thanks!

Acked-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>