[PATCH v7 2/2] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void

Abinash Singh posted 2 patches 1 month, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v7 2/2] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void
Posted by Abinash Singh 1 month, 2 weeks ago
The sd_revalidate_disk() function currently returns 0 for
both success and memory allocation failure.Since none of its
callers use the return value, this return code is both unnecessary
and potentially misleading.

Change the return type of sd_revalidate_disk() from int to void
and remove all return value handling. This makes the function
semantics clearer and avoids confusion about unused return codes.

Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/sd.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index c3791746806d..ba3bfd9b00aa 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct queue_limits *lim,
 		unsigned int mode);
 static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
 		struct queue_limits *lim);
-static int  sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *);
+static void  sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *);
 static void sd_unlock_native_capacity(struct gendisk *disk);
 static void sd_shutdown(struct device *);
 static void scsi_disk_release(struct device *cdev);
@@ -3691,7 +3691,7 @@ static void sd_read_block_zero(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
  *	performs disk spin up, read_capacity, etc.
  *	@disk: struct gendisk we care about
  **/
-static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
+static void sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
 {
 	struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(disk);
 	struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
@@ -3709,13 +3709,13 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
 	 * of the other niceties.
 	 */
 	if (!scsi_device_online(sdp))
-		goto out;
+		return;
 
 	lim = kmalloc(sizeof(*lim), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!lim) {
 		sd_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdkp,
 			"sd_revalidate_disk: Disk limit allocation failure.\n");
-		goto out;
+		return;
 	}
 
 	buffer = kmalloc(SD_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -3829,7 +3829,6 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
 	kfree(lim);
 	kfree(buffer);
 
-	return err;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void
Posted by Bart Van Assche 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On 8/16/25 1:53 PM, Abinash Singh wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index c3791746806d..ba3bfd9b00aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct queue_limits *lim,
>   		unsigned int mode);
>   static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
>   		struct queue_limits *lim);
> -static int  sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *);
> +static void  sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *);
>   static void sd_unlock_native_capacity(struct gendisk *disk);
>   static void sd_shutdown(struct device *);
>   static void scsi_disk_release(struct device *cdev);
> @@ -3691,7 +3691,7 @@ static void sd_read_block_zero(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
>    *	performs disk spin up, read_capacity, etc.
>    *	@disk: struct gendisk we care about
>    **/
> -static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> +static void sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
>   {
>   	struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(disk);
>   	struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
> @@ -3709,13 +3709,13 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
>   	 * of the other niceties.
>   	 */
>   	if (!scsi_device_online(sdp))
> -		goto out;
> +		return;
>   
>   	lim = kmalloc(sizeof(*lim), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!lim) {
>   		sd_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdkp,
>   			"sd_revalidate_disk: Disk limit allocation failure.\n");
> -		goto out;
> +		return;
>   	}
>   
>   	buffer = kmalloc(SD_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -3829,7 +3829,6 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
>   	kfree(lim);
>   	kfree(buffer);
>   
> -	return err;
>   }

Shouldn't this patch remove the initializer from the 'err' variable?
Otherwise this patch looks good to me.

Bart.