drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
From: "Leilk.Liu" <leilk.liu@mediatek.com>
The old IC does not support the I2C_MASTER_WRRD (write-then-read)
function, but the current code’s handling of i2c->auto_restart may
potentially lead to entering the I2C_MASTER_WRRD software flow,
resulting in unexpected bugs.
Instead of repurposing the auto_restart flag, add a separate flag
to signal I2C_MASTER_WRRD operations.
Also fix handling of msgs. If the operation (i2c->op) is
I2C_MASTER_WRRD, then the msgs pointer is incremented by 2.
For all other operations, msgs is simply incremented by 1.
Fixes: 173b77e8d8fe ("i2c: mediatek: add i2c first write then read optimization")
Signed-off-by: Leilk.Liu <leilk.liu@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
index ab456c3717db..dee40704825c 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
@@ -1243,6 +1243,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
{
int ret;
int left_num = num;
+ bool write_then_read_en = false;
struct mtk_i2c *i2c = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
ret = clk_bulk_enable(I2C_MT65XX_CLK_MAX, i2c->clocks);
@@ -1256,6 +1257,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
if (!(msgs[0].flags & I2C_M_RD) && (msgs[1].flags & I2C_M_RD) &&
msgs[0].addr == msgs[1].addr) {
i2c->auto_restart = 0;
+ write_then_read_en = true;
}
}
@@ -1280,12 +1282,10 @@ static int mtk_i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
else
i2c->op = I2C_MASTER_WR;
- if (!i2c->auto_restart) {
- if (num > 1) {
- /* combined two messages into one transaction */
- i2c->op = I2C_MASTER_WRRD;
- left_num--;
- }
+ if (write_then_read_en) {
+ /* combined two messages into one transaction */
+ i2c->op = I2C_MASTER_WRRD;
+ left_num--;
}
/* always use DMA mode. */
@@ -1293,7 +1293,10 @@ static int mtk_i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
if (ret < 0)
goto err_exit;
- msgs++;
+ if (i2c->op == I2C_MASTER_WRRD)
+ msgs += 2;
+ else
+ msgs++;
}
/* the return value is number of executed messages */
ret = num;
--
2.46.0
Hi Leilk, On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 03:53:54PM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > From: "Leilk.Liu" <leilk.liu@mediatek.com> > > The old IC does not support the I2C_MASTER_WRRD (write-then-read) > function, but the current code’s handling of i2c->auto_restart may > potentially lead to entering the I2C_MASTER_WRRD software flow, > resulting in unexpected bugs. do you mean unexpected behaviour? > Instead of repurposing the auto_restart flag, add a separate flag > to signal I2C_MASTER_WRRD operations. > > Also fix handling of msgs. If the operation (i2c->op) is > I2C_MASTER_WRRD, then the msgs pointer is incremented by 2. > For all other operations, msgs is simply incremented by 1. > > Fixes: 173b77e8d8fe ("i2c: mediatek: add i2c first write then read optimization") > No need for blank line here. BTW, this doesn't look the commit that is introducing the issue. > Signed-off-by: Leilk.Liu <leilk.liu@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 17 ++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > index ab456c3717db..dee40704825c 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > @@ -1243,6 +1243,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, > { > int ret; > int left_num = num; > + bool write_then_read_en = false; > struct mtk_i2c *i2c = i2c_get_adapdata(adap); > > ret = clk_bulk_enable(I2C_MT65XX_CLK_MAX, i2c->clocks); > @@ -1256,6 +1257,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, > if (!(msgs[0].flags & I2C_M_RD) && (msgs[1].flags & I2C_M_RD) && > msgs[0].addr == msgs[1].addr) { > i2c->auto_restart = 0; > + write_then_read_en = true; why don't we set "i2c->op = I2C_MASTER_WRRD" here and avoid an extra flag? Thanks, Andi > } > } >
On Tue, 2025-08-19 at 20:09 -0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > you have verified the sender or the content. > > Hi Andi, sorry for late reply. > Hi Leilk, > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 03:53:54PM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > > From: "Leilk.Liu" <leilk.liu@mediatek.com> > > > > The old IC does not support the I2C_MASTER_WRRD (write-then-read) > > function, but the current code’s handling of i2c->auto_restart may > > potentially lead to entering the I2C_MASTER_WRRD software flow, > > resulting in unexpected bugs. > > do you mean unexpected behaviour? sure. > > > Instead of repurposing the auto_restart flag, add a separate flag > > to signal I2C_MASTER_WRRD operations. > > > > Also fix handling of msgs. If the operation (i2c->op) is > > I2C_MASTER_WRRD, then the msgs pointer is incremented by 2. > > For all other operations, msgs is simply incremented by 1. > > > > Fixes: 173b77e8d8fe ("i2c: mediatek: add i2c first write then read > > optimization") > > > > No need for blank line here. BTW, this doesn't look the commit > that is introducing the issue. > OK. Fixes:b2ed11e224a2 ("I2C: mediatek: Add driver for MediaTek MT8173 I2C controller") > > Signed-off-by: Leilk.Liu <leilk.liu@mediatek.com> > > --- > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 17 ++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > > b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > > index ab456c3717db..dee40704825c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > > @@ -1243,6 +1243,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_transfer(struct > > i2c_adapter *adap, > > { > > int ret; > > int left_num = num; > > + bool write_then_read_en = false; > > struct mtk_i2c *i2c = i2c_get_adapdata(adap); > > > > ret = clk_bulk_enable(I2C_MT65XX_CLK_MAX, i2c->clocks); > > @@ -1256,6 +1257,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_transfer(struct > > i2c_adapter *adap, > > if (!(msgs[0].flags & I2C_M_RD) && (msgs[1].flags & > > I2C_M_RD) && > > msgs[0].addr == msgs[1].addr) { > > i2c->auto_restart = 0; > > + write_then_read_en = true; > > why don't we set "i2c->op = I2C_MASTER_WRRD" here and avoid an > extra flag? > we need to set "i2c->op" again in the following code, so an extra flag is necessary. > Thanks, > Andi > > > } > > } > >
On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 3:55 PM Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > From: "Leilk.Liu" <leilk.liu@mediatek.com> > > The old IC does not support the I2C_MASTER_WRRD (write-then-read) > function, but the current code’s handling of i2c->auto_restart may > potentially lead to entering the I2C_MASTER_WRRD software flow, > resulting in unexpected bugs. > > Instead of repurposing the auto_restart flag, add a separate flag > to signal I2C_MASTER_WRRD operations. > > Also fix handling of msgs. If the operation (i2c->op) is > I2C_MASTER_WRRD, then the msgs pointer is incremented by 2. > For all other operations, msgs is simply incremented by 1. > > Fixes: 173b77e8d8fe ("i2c: mediatek: add i2c first write then read optimization") > > Signed-off-by: Leilk.Liu <leilk.liu@mediatek.com> This was Suggested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> internally because the code looked funny. Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.