From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The YMM0-15 is composed of XMM and YMMH. It requires 2 XSAVE commands to
get the complete value. Internally, the XMM and YMMH are stored in
different structures, which follow the XSAVE format. But the output
dumps the YMM as a whole.
The qwords 4 imply YMM.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++++
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 4 +++-
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 10 +++++++++-
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 1789b91c95c6..aebd4e56dff1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -423,6 +423,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask)
if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE)
perf_regs->xmm_space = xsave->i387.xmm_space;
+
+ if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM)
+ perf_regs->ymmh = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_YMM);
}
static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void)
@@ -725,6 +728,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS &&
!(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS &&
+ !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM))
+ return -EINVAL;
}
}
return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
@@ -1837,6 +1843,13 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_SSE;
}
+ if (attr->sample_simd_regs_enabled) {
+ if (attr->sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) {
+ perf_regs->ymmh_regs = NULL;
+ mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_YMM;
+ }
+ }
+
mask &= ~ignore_mask;
if (mask)
x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(perf_regs, mask);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 538219c59979..81e3143fd91a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -597,6 +597,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
u64 *xmm_regs;
u32 *xmm_space; /* for xsaves */
};
+ union {
+ u64 *ymmh_regs;
+ struct ymmh_struct *ymmh;
+ };
};
extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index bd8af802f757..feb3e8f80761 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
#define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
#define PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS 2
-#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS
+#define PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS 4
+#define PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS (PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS / 2)
+#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS
#endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 397357c5896b..d94bc687e4bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ void perf_simd_reg_check(struct pt_regs *regs,
if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs)
*nr_vectors = 0;
+ if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs)
+ *vec_qwords = PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS;
+
*nr_pred = 0;
}
@@ -105,6 +108,10 @@ u64 perf_simd_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx,
if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
return 0;
return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx * PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS + qwords_idx];
+ } else if (qwords_idx < PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) {
+ if (!perf_regs->ymmh_regs)
+ return 0;
+ return perf_regs->ymmh_regs[idx * PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS + qwords_idx - PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS];
}
return 0;
@@ -121,7 +128,8 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask,
if (vec_mask)
return -EINVAL;
} else {
- if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS)
+ if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS &&
+ vec_qwords != PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS)
return -EINVAL;
if (vec_mask & ~PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.38.1
On 8/16/2025 5:34 AM, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> The YMM0-15 is composed of XMM and YMMH. It requires 2 XSAVE commands to
> get the complete value. Internally, the XMM and YMMH are stored in
> different structures, which follow the XSAVE format. But the output
> dumps the YMM as a whole.
>
> The qwords 4 imply YMM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 4 +++-
> arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index 1789b91c95c6..aebd4e56dff1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask)
>
> if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE)
> perf_regs->xmm_space = xsave->i387.xmm_space;
> +
> + if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM)
> + perf_regs->ymmh = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_YMM);
> }
>
> static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void)
> @@ -725,6 +728,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
> if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS &&
> !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE))
> return -EINVAL;
> + if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS &&
> + !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM))
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
> return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
> @@ -1837,6 +1843,13 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
> mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_SSE;
> }
>
> + if (attr->sample_simd_regs_enabled) {
> + if (attr->sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) {
> + perf_regs->ymmh_regs = NULL;
> + mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_YMM;
> + }
> + }
> +
> mask &= ~ignore_mask;
> if (mask)
> x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(perf_regs, mask);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index 538219c59979..81e3143fd91a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -597,6 +597,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
> u64 *xmm_regs;
> u32 *xmm_space; /* for xsaves */
> };
> + union {
> + u64 *ymmh_regs;
> + struct ymmh_struct *ymmh;
> + };
> };
>
> extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index bd8af802f757..feb3e8f80761 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
> #define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
>
> #define PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS 2
> -#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS
> +#define PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS 4
> +#define PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS (PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS / 2)
> +#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS
>
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> index 397357c5896b..d94bc687e4bf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ void perf_simd_reg_check(struct pt_regs *regs,
> if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs)
> *nr_vectors = 0;
>
> + if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs)
should be "!perf_regs->ymmh_regs"?
> + *vec_qwords = PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS;
> +
> *nr_pred = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -105,6 +108,10 @@ u64 perf_simd_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx,
> if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
> return 0;
> return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx * PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS + qwords_idx];
> + } else if (qwords_idx < PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) {
> + if (!perf_regs->ymmh_regs)
> + return 0;
> + return perf_regs->ymmh_regs[idx * PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS + qwords_idx - PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS];
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -121,7 +128,8 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask,
> if (vec_mask)
> return -EINVAL;
> } else {
> - if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS)
> + if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS &&
> + vec_qwords != PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (vec_mask & ~PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK)
> return -EINVAL;
On 2025-08-20 2:59 a.m., Mi, Dapeng wrote:
>
> On 8/16/2025 5:34 AM, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> The YMM0-15 is composed of XMM and YMMH. It requires 2 XSAVE commands to
>> get the complete value. Internally, the XMM and YMMH are stored in
>> different structures, which follow the XSAVE format. But the output
>> dumps the YMM as a whole.
>>
>> The qwords 4 imply YMM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/events/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++++
>> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 4 +++-
>> arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>> index 1789b91c95c6..aebd4e56dff1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>> @@ -423,6 +423,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask)
>>
>> if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE)
>> perf_regs->xmm_space = xsave->i387.xmm_space;
>> +
>> + if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM)
>> + perf_regs->ymmh = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_YMM);
>> }
>>
>> static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void)
>> @@ -725,6 +728,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
>> if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS &&
>> !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> + if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS &&
>> + !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> }
>> return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
>> @@ -1837,6 +1843,13 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
>> mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_SSE;
>> }
>>
>> + if (attr->sample_simd_regs_enabled) {
>> + if (attr->sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) {
>> + perf_regs->ymmh_regs = NULL;
>> + mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_YMM;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> mask &= ~ignore_mask;
>> if (mask)
>> x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(perf_regs, mask);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> index 538219c59979..81e3143fd91a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> @@ -597,6 +597,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
>> u64 *xmm_regs;
>> u32 *xmm_space; /* for xsaves */
>> };
>> + union {
>> + u64 *ymmh_regs;
>> + struct ymmh_struct *ymmh;
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> index bd8af802f757..feb3e8f80761 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
>> #define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
>>
>> #define PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS 2
>> -#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS
>> +#define PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS 4
>> +#define PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS (PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS / 2)
>> +#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS
>>
>> #endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
>> index 397357c5896b..d94bc687e4bf 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
>> @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ void perf_simd_reg_check(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs)
>> *nr_vectors = 0;
>>
>> + if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs)
>
> should be "!perf_regs->ymmh_regs"?
Oops, good catch.
Thansk,
Kan
>
>
>> + *vec_qwords = PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS;
>> +
>> *nr_pred = 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -105,6 +108,10 @@ u64 perf_simd_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx,
>> if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
>> return 0;
>> return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx * PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS + qwords_idx];
>> + } else if (qwords_idx < PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) {
>> + if (!perf_regs->ymmh_regs)
>> + return 0;
>> + return perf_regs->ymmh_regs[idx * PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS + qwords_idx - PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS];
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -121,7 +128,8 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask,
>> if (vec_mask)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> } else {
>> - if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS)
>> + if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS &&
>> + vec_qwords != PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> if (vec_mask & ~PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK)
>> return -EINVAL;
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.