From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The YMM0-15 is composed of XMM and YMMH. It requires 2 XSAVE commands to
get the complete value. Internally, the XMM and YMMH are stored in
different structures, which follow the XSAVE format. But the output
dumps the YMM as a whole.
The qwords 4 imply YMM.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++++
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 4 +++-
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 10 +++++++++-
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 1789b91c95c6..aebd4e56dff1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -423,6 +423,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask)
if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE)
perf_regs->xmm_space = xsave->i387.xmm_space;
+
+ if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM)
+ perf_regs->ymmh = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_YMM);
}
static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void)
@@ -725,6 +728,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS &&
!(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS &&
+ !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM))
+ return -EINVAL;
}
}
return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
@@ -1837,6 +1843,13 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_SSE;
}
+ if (attr->sample_simd_regs_enabled) {
+ if (attr->sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) {
+ perf_regs->ymmh_regs = NULL;
+ mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_YMM;
+ }
+ }
+
mask &= ~ignore_mask;
if (mask)
x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(perf_regs, mask);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 538219c59979..81e3143fd91a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -597,6 +597,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
u64 *xmm_regs;
u32 *xmm_space; /* for xsaves */
};
+ union {
+ u64 *ymmh_regs;
+ struct ymmh_struct *ymmh;
+ };
};
extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index bd8af802f757..feb3e8f80761 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
#define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
#define PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS 2
-#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS
+#define PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS 4
+#define PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS (PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS / 2)
+#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS
#endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 397357c5896b..d94bc687e4bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ void perf_simd_reg_check(struct pt_regs *regs,
if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs)
*nr_vectors = 0;
+ if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs)
+ *vec_qwords = PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS;
+
*nr_pred = 0;
}
@@ -105,6 +108,10 @@ u64 perf_simd_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx,
if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
return 0;
return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx * PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS + qwords_idx];
+ } else if (qwords_idx < PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) {
+ if (!perf_regs->ymmh_regs)
+ return 0;
+ return perf_regs->ymmh_regs[idx * PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS + qwords_idx - PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS];
}
return 0;
@@ -121,7 +128,8 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask,
if (vec_mask)
return -EINVAL;
} else {
- if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS)
+ if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS &&
+ vec_qwords != PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS)
return -EINVAL;
if (vec_mask & ~PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.38.1
On 8/16/2025 5:34 AM, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> > > The YMM0-15 is composed of XMM and YMMH. It requires 2 XSAVE commands to > get the complete value. Internally, the XMM and YMMH are stored in > different structures, which follow the XSAVE format. But the output > dumps the YMM as a whole. > > The qwords 4 imply YMM. > > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/events/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++++ > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 4 +++- > arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 10 +++++++++- > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c > index 1789b91c95c6..aebd4e56dff1 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c > +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c > @@ -423,6 +423,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask) > > if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE) > perf_regs->xmm_space = xsave->i387.xmm_space; > + > + if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM) > + perf_regs->ymmh = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_YMM); > } > > static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void) > @@ -725,6 +728,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event) > if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && > !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE)) > return -EINVAL; > + if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS && > + !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM)) > + return -EINVAL; > } > } > return x86_setup_perfctr(event); > @@ -1837,6 +1843,13 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event, > mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_SSE; > } > > + if (attr->sample_simd_regs_enabled) { > + if (attr->sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) { > + perf_regs->ymmh_regs = NULL; > + mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_YMM; > + } > + } > + > mask &= ~ignore_mask; > if (mask) > x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(perf_regs, mask); > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h > index 538219c59979..81e3143fd91a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h > @@ -597,6 +597,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs { > u64 *xmm_regs; > u32 *xmm_space; /* for xsaves */ > }; > + union { > + u64 *ymmh_regs; > + struct ymmh_struct *ymmh; > + }; > }; > > extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs); > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h > index bd8af802f757..feb3e8f80761 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h > @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs { > #define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX - 1, 0) > > #define PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS 2 > -#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS > +#define PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS 4 > +#define PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS (PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS / 2) > +#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS > > #endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */ > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c > index 397357c5896b..d94bc687e4bf 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c > @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ void perf_simd_reg_check(struct pt_regs *regs, > if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs) > *nr_vectors = 0; > > + if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs) should be "!perf_regs->ymmh_regs"? > + *vec_qwords = PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS; > + > *nr_pred = 0; > } > > @@ -105,6 +108,10 @@ u64 perf_simd_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx, > if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs) > return 0; > return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx * PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS + qwords_idx]; > + } else if (qwords_idx < PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) { > + if (!perf_regs->ymmh_regs) > + return 0; > + return perf_regs->ymmh_regs[idx * PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS + qwords_idx - PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS]; > } > > return 0; > @@ -121,7 +128,8 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask, > if (vec_mask) > return -EINVAL; > } else { > - if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS) > + if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && > + vec_qwords != PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) > return -EINVAL; > if (vec_mask & ~PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK) > return -EINVAL;
On 2025-08-20 2:59 a.m., Mi, Dapeng wrote: > > On 8/16/2025 5:34 AM, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote: >> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> >> >> The YMM0-15 is composed of XMM and YMMH. It requires 2 XSAVE commands to >> get the complete value. Internally, the XMM and YMMH are stored in >> different structures, which follow the XSAVE format. But the output >> dumps the YMM as a whole. >> >> The qwords 4 imply YMM. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/events/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++ >> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++++ >> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 4 +++- >> arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 10 +++++++++- >> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c >> index 1789b91c95c6..aebd4e56dff1 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c >> @@ -423,6 +423,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask) >> >> if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE) >> perf_regs->xmm_space = xsave->i387.xmm_space; >> + >> + if (valid_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM) >> + perf_regs->ymmh = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_YMM); >> } >> >> static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void) >> @@ -725,6 +728,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event) >> if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && >> !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE)) >> return -EINVAL; >> + if (event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS && >> + !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & XFEATURE_MASK_YMM)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> } >> } >> return x86_setup_perfctr(event); >> @@ -1837,6 +1843,13 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event, >> mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_SSE; >> } >> >> + if (attr->sample_simd_regs_enabled) { >> + if (attr->sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) { >> + perf_regs->ymmh_regs = NULL; >> + mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_YMM; >> + } >> + } >> + >> mask &= ~ignore_mask; >> if (mask) >> x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(perf_regs, mask); >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h >> index 538219c59979..81e3143fd91a 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h >> @@ -597,6 +597,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs { >> u64 *xmm_regs; >> u32 *xmm_space; /* for xsaves */ >> }; >> + union { >> + u64 *ymmh_regs; >> + struct ymmh_struct *ymmh; >> + }; >> }; >> >> extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs); >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h >> index bd8af802f757..feb3e8f80761 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h >> @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs { >> #define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX - 1, 0) >> >> #define PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS 2 >> -#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS >> +#define PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS 4 >> +#define PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS (PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS / 2) >> +#define PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS >> >> #endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */ >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c >> index 397357c5896b..d94bc687e4bf 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c >> @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ void perf_simd_reg_check(struct pt_regs *regs, >> if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs) >> *nr_vectors = 0; >> >> + if (*vec_qwords >= PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS && !perf_regs->xmm_regs) > > should be "!perf_regs->ymmh_regs"? Oops, good catch. Thansk, Kan > > >> + *vec_qwords = PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS; >> + >> *nr_pred = 0; >> } >> >> @@ -105,6 +108,10 @@ u64 perf_simd_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx, >> if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs) >> return 0; >> return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx * PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS + qwords_idx]; >> + } else if (qwords_idx < PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) { >> + if (!perf_regs->ymmh_regs) >> + return 0; >> + return perf_regs->ymmh_regs[idx * PERF_X86_YMMH_QWORDS + qwords_idx - PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS]; >> } >> >> return 0; >> @@ -121,7 +128,8 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask, >> if (vec_mask) >> return -EINVAL; >> } else { >> - if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS) >> + if (vec_qwords != PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS && >> + vec_qwords != PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS) >> return -EINVAL; >> if (vec_mask & ~PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK) >> return -EINVAL;
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.