J-Core is a clean-room open source processor and SoC design using the
SuperH instruction set.

The 'jcore' prefix is in use by IP cores originating from this design.

Link: https://j-core.org
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Artur Rojek <contact@artur-rojek.eu>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
index a92261b10c52..558f51665616 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
@@ -783,6 +783,8 @@ patternProperties:
     description: Jadard Technology Inc.
   "^jasonic,.*":
     description: Jasonic Technology Ltd.
+  "^jcore,.*":
+    description: J-Core Open Processor
   "^jdi,.*":
     description: Japan Display Inc.
   "^jedec,.*":
-- 
2.50.1

On 15/08/2025 21:48, Artur Rojek wrote:
> J-Core is a clean-room open source processor and SoC design using the
> SuperH instruction set.
> 
> The 'jcore' prefix is in use by IP cores originating from this design.
> 
> Link: https://j-core.org
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Rojek <contact@artur-rojek.eu>

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On 15/08/2025 21:48, Artur Rojek wrote:
> J-Core is a clean-room open source processor and SoC design using the
> SuperH instruction set.
> 
> The 'jcore' prefix is in use by IP cores originating from this design.
> 
> Link: https://j-core.org
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

How is it possible if this is v1? If this is not v1, where is changelog
and why isn't it marked as vx?

> Signed-off-by: Artur Rojek <contact@artur-rojek.eu>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Best regards,
Krzysztof

Hi Krzysztof,

On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 at 10:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On 15/08/2025 21:48, Artur Rojek wrote:
> > J-Core is a clean-room open source processor and SoC design using the
> > SuperH instruction set.
> >
> > The 'jcore' prefix is in use by IP cores originating from this design.
> >
> > Link: https://j-core.org
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
> How is it possible if this is v1? If this is not v1, where is changelog
> and why isn't it marked as vx?

The patch series had several iterations (v0, v-1, v-2 ;-), with a limited
audience.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

On 16/08/2025 10:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 at 10:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On 15/08/2025 21:48, Artur Rojek wrote:
>>> J-Core is a clean-room open source processor and SoC design using the
>>> SuperH instruction set.
>>>
>>> The 'jcore' prefix is in use by IP cores originating from this design.
>>>
>>> Link: https://j-core.org
>>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>>
>> How is it possible if this is v1? If this is not v1, where is changelog
>> and why isn't it marked as vx?
> 
> The patch series had several iterations (v0, v-1, v-2 ;-), with a limited
> audience.

Thanks, would be nice to see it reflected somewhere.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On 2025-08-16 11:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/08/2025 10:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,

Hi Krzysztof,
thanks for the review!

>> 
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 at 10:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> On 15/08/2025 21:48, Artur Rojek wrote:
>>>> J-Core is a clean-room open source processor and SoC design using 
>>>> the
>>>> SuperH instruction set.
>>>> 
>>>> The 'jcore' prefix is in use by IP cores originating from this 
>>>> design.
>>>> 
>>>> Link: https://j-core.org
>>>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>>> 
>>> How is it possible if this is v1? If this is not v1, where is 
>>> changelog
>>> and why isn't it marked as vx?
>> 
>> The patch series had several iterations (v0, v-1, v-2 ;-), with a 
>> limited
>> audience.
> 
> Thanks, would be nice to see it reflected somewhere.

I mentioned it in the cover letter.

For the record:
v1: capitalize Open Processor
v0: new patch

Cheers,
Artur

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof