The IT66122 is a pin compatible replacement for the IT66122. Based on
empirical testing, the new device looks to be compatible with IT66121.
However due to a lack of public data sheet at this time beyond overall
feature list[1] (which seems to add additional features vs ITT66121),
it is hard to determine that additional register operations required
to enable additional features.
So, introduce the device as a new compatible that we will detect based
on vid/pid match, with explicit id that can be used to extend the
driver capability as information becomes available later on.
[1] https://www.ite.com.tw/en/product/cate1/IT66122
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
---
Changes in V3:
* Dropped the claim that it is 1-1 replacement of IT66121.
* Based on emperical test result[2], introduce the same configuration of
IT66121, but provide ID as suggested by Devarsh to allow for future
expansion of functionality.
NOTE: I did consider the possibility of converting the chip_id into a
bitfield, but decided it is over-engineering, so kept the enum.
[2] https://github.com/beagleboard/linux/commits/v6.1.83-ti-rt-r40
V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250813204106.580141-4-nm@ti.com/
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c
index 5ac9631bcd9a..a108d287722d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c
@@ -287,6 +287,7 @@
enum chip_id {
ID_IT6610,
ID_IT66121,
+ ID_IT66122,
};
struct it66121_chip_info {
@@ -402,7 +403,7 @@ static int it66121_configure_afe(struct it66121_ctx *ctx,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121) {
+ if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) {
ret = regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_AFE_IP_REG,
IT66121_AFE_IP_EC1, 0);
if (ret)
@@ -428,7 +429,7 @@ static int it66121_configure_afe(struct it66121_ctx *ctx,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121) {
+ if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) {
ret = regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_AFE_IP_REG,
IT66121_AFE_IP_EC1,
IT66121_AFE_IP_EC1);
@@ -599,7 +600,7 @@ static int it66121_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121) {
+ if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) {
ret = regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_CLK_BANK_REG,
IT66121_CLK_BANK_PWROFF_RCLK, 0);
if (ret)
@@ -802,7 +803,7 @@ void it66121_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
if (regmap_write(ctx->regmap, IT66121_HDMI_MODE_REG, IT66121_HDMI_MODE_HDMI))
goto unlock;
- if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 &&
+ if ((ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) &&
regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_CLK_BANK_REG,
IT66121_CLK_BANK_PWROFF_TXCLK,
IT66121_CLK_BANK_PWROFF_TXCLK)) {
@@ -815,7 +816,7 @@ void it66121_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
if (it66121_configure_afe(ctx, adjusted_mode))
goto unlock;
- if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 &&
+ if ((ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) &&
regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_CLK_BANK_REG,
IT66121_CLK_BANK_PWROFF_TXCLK, 0)) {
goto unlock;
@@ -1614,12 +1615,14 @@ static void it66121_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
}
static const struct it66121_chip_info it66xx_chip_info[] = {
+ {.id = ID_IT66122, .vid = 0x4954, .pid = 0x0622 },
{.id = ID_IT66121, .vid = 0x4954, .pid = 0x0612 },
{.id = ID_IT6610, .vid = 0xca00, .pid = 0x0611 },
{ }
};
static const struct of_device_id it66121_dt_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "ite,it66122", &it66xx_chip_info },
{ .compatible = "ite,it66121", &it66xx_chip_info },
{ .compatible = "ite,it6610", &it66xx_chip_info },
{ }
@@ -1627,6 +1630,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id it66121_dt_match[] = {
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, it66121_dt_match);
static const struct i2c_device_id it66121_id[] = {
+ { "it66122", (kernel_ulong_t)&it66xx_chip_info },
{ "it66121", (kernel_ulong_t)&it66xx_chip_info },
{ "it6610", (kernel_ulong_t)&it66xx_chip_info },
{ }
--
2.47.0
On 8/14/25 10:41 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > The IT66122 is a pin compatible replacement for the IT66122. Based on > empirical testing, the new device looks to be compatible with IT66121. > However due to a lack of public data sheet at this time beyond overall > feature list[1] (which seems to add additional features vs ITT66121), > it is hard to determine that additional register operations required > to enable additional features. > > So, introduce the device as a new compatible that we will detect based > on vid/pid match, with explicit id that can be used to extend the > driver capability as information becomes available later on. > > [1] https://www.ite.com.tw/en/product/cate1/IT66122 > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> > --- > Changes in V3: > * Dropped the claim that it is 1-1 replacement of IT66121. > * Based on emperical test result[2], introduce the same configuration of > IT66121, but provide ID as suggested by Devarsh to allow for future > expansion of functionality. > > NOTE: I did consider the possibility of converting the chip_id into a > bitfield, but decided it is over-engineering, so kept the enum. > But over-engineering is so much more fun :D Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> > [2] https://github.com/beagleboard/linux/commits/v6.1.83-ti-rt-r40 > > V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250813204106.580141-4-nm@ti.com/ > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c | 14 +++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c > index 5ac9631bcd9a..a108d287722d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c > @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ > enum chip_id { > ID_IT6610, > ID_IT66121, > + ID_IT66122, > }; > > struct it66121_chip_info { > @@ -402,7 +403,7 @@ static int it66121_configure_afe(struct it66121_ctx *ctx, > if (ret) > return ret; > > - if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121) { > + if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) { > ret = regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_AFE_IP_REG, > IT66121_AFE_IP_EC1, 0); > if (ret) > @@ -428,7 +429,7 @@ static int it66121_configure_afe(struct it66121_ctx *ctx, > if (ret) > return ret; > > - if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121) { > + if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) { > ret = regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_AFE_IP_REG, > IT66121_AFE_IP_EC1, > IT66121_AFE_IP_EC1); > @@ -599,7 +600,7 @@ static int it66121_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge, > if (ret) > return ret; > > - if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121) { > + if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) { > ret = regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_CLK_BANK_REG, > IT66121_CLK_BANK_PWROFF_RCLK, 0); > if (ret) > @@ -802,7 +803,7 @@ void it66121_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge, > if (regmap_write(ctx->regmap, IT66121_HDMI_MODE_REG, IT66121_HDMI_MODE_HDMI)) > goto unlock; > > - if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 && > + if ((ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) && > regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_CLK_BANK_REG, > IT66121_CLK_BANK_PWROFF_TXCLK, > IT66121_CLK_BANK_PWROFF_TXCLK)) { > @@ -815,7 +816,7 @@ void it66121_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge, > if (it66121_configure_afe(ctx, adjusted_mode)) > goto unlock; > > - if (ctx->id == ID_IT66121 && > + if ((ctx->id == ID_IT66121 || ctx->id == ID_IT66122) && > regmap_write_bits(ctx->regmap, IT66121_CLK_BANK_REG, > IT66121_CLK_BANK_PWROFF_TXCLK, 0)) { > goto unlock; > @@ -1614,12 +1615,14 @@ static void it66121_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > } > > static const struct it66121_chip_info it66xx_chip_info[] = { > + {.id = ID_IT66122, .vid = 0x4954, .pid = 0x0622 }, > {.id = ID_IT66121, .vid = 0x4954, .pid = 0x0612 }, > {.id = ID_IT6610, .vid = 0xca00, .pid = 0x0611 }, > { } > }; > > static const struct of_device_id it66121_dt_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "ite,it66122", &it66xx_chip_info }, > { .compatible = "ite,it66121", &it66xx_chip_info }, > { .compatible = "ite,it6610", &it66xx_chip_info }, > { } > @@ -1627,6 +1630,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id it66121_dt_match[] = { > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, it66121_dt_match); > > static const struct i2c_device_id it66121_id[] = { > + { "it66122", (kernel_ulong_t)&it66xx_chip_info }, > { "it66121", (kernel_ulong_t)&it66xx_chip_info }, > { "it6610", (kernel_ulong_t)&it66xx_chip_info }, > { }
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.