[PATCH v5 15/15] pinctrl: qcom: make the pinmuxing strict

Bartosz Golaszewski posted 15 patches 1 month, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v5 15/15] pinctrl: qcom: make the pinmuxing strict
Posted by Bartosz Golaszewski 1 month, 2 weeks ago
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

The strict flag in struct pinmux_ops disallows the usage of the same pin
as a GPIO and for another function. Without it, a rouge user-space
process with enough privileges (or even a buggy driver) can request a
used pin as GPIO and drive it, potentially confusing devices or even
crashing the system. Set it globally for all pinctrl-msm users.

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
index a5f69464827119dfe2a7781b558094b283fca215..1751d838ce95d6138c824b90098f74891dec7656 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
@@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static const struct pinmux_ops msm_pinmux_ops = {
 	.function_is_gpio	= pinmux_generic_function_is_gpio,
 	.gpio_request_enable	= msm_pinmux_request_gpio,
 	.set_mux		= msm_pinmux_set_mux,
+	.strict			= true,
 };
 
 static int msm_config_reg(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl,

-- 
2.48.1
Re: [PATCH v5 15/15] pinctrl: qcom: make the pinmuxing strict
Posted by Neil Armstrong 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On 15/08/2025 11:09, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> The strict flag in struct pinmux_ops disallows the usage of the same pin
> as a GPIO and for another function. Without it, a rouge user-space
> process with enough privileges (or even a buggy driver) can request a
> used pin as GPIO and drive it, potentially confusing devices or even
> crashing the system. Set it globally for all pinctrl-msm users.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> index a5f69464827119dfe2a7781b558094b283fca215..1751d838ce95d6138c824b90098f74891dec7656 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static const struct pinmux_ops msm_pinmux_ops = {
>   	.function_is_gpio	= pinmux_generic_function_is_gpio,
>   	.gpio_request_enable	= msm_pinmux_request_gpio,
>   	.set_mux		= msm_pinmux_set_mux,
> +	.strict			= true,
>   };
>   
>   static int msm_config_reg(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl,
> 

I tested the patchset on CI, and I got the following errors:

db410c:
https://git.codelinaro.org/linaro/qcomlt/ci/staging/cdba-tester/-/jobs/253304#L537
[    4.056081] msm8916-pinctrl 1000000.pinctrl: pin GPIO_38 already requested by 1000000.pinctrl:550; cannot claim for 7864900.mmc
[    4.061402] msm8916-pinctrl 1000000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: pin-38 (7864900.mmc)
[    4.077245] msm8916-pinctrl 1000000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: could not request pin 38 (GPIO_38) from group gpio38 on device 1000000.pinctrl
[    4.088430] sdhci_msm 7864900.mmc: Error applying setting, reverse things back
[    4.100751] msm8916-pinctrl 1000000.pinctrl: pin GPIO_38 already requested by 1000000.pinctrl:550; cannot claim for 7864900.mmc
[    4.107960] msm8916-pinctrl 1000000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: pin-38 (7864900.mmc)
[    4.107970] msm8916-pinctrl 1000000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: could not request pin 38 (GPIO_38) from group gpio38 on device 1000000.pinctrl
[    4.126971] sdhci_msm 7864900.mmc: Error applying setting, reverse things back
[    4.139203] sdhci_msm 7864900.mmc: failed to activate pinctrl state sleep

rb3gen2:
https://git.codelinaro.org/linaro/qcomlt/ci/staging/cdba-tester/-/jobs/253305#L1120
[    4.155880] sc7280-pinctrl f100000.pinctrl: pin GPIO_91 already requested by f100000.pinctrl:638; cannot claim for 8804000.mmc
[    4.167636] sc7280-pinctrl f100000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: pin-91 (8804000.mmc)
[    4.179817] sc7280-pinctrl f100000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: could not request pin 91 (GPIO_91) from group gpio91 on device f100000.pinctrl
[    4.196265] sdhci_msm 8804000.mmc: Error applying setting, reverse things back
[    4.196293] sc7280-pinctrl f100000.pinctrl: pin GPIO_91 already requested by f100000.pinctrl:638; cannot claim for 8804000.mmc
[    4.203735] sc7280-pinctrl f100000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: pin-91 (8804000.mmc)
[    4.203743] sc7280-pinctrl f100000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: could not request pin 91 (GPIO_91) from group gpio91 on device f100000.pinctrl
[    4.235716] sdhci_msm 8804000.mmc: Error applying setting, reverse things back
[    4.235722] sdhci_msm 8804000.mmc: failed to activate pinctrl state sleep

x1-qcp:
https://git.codelinaro.org/linaro/qcomlt/ci/staging/cdba-tester/-/jobs/253310#L1776
[    5.881549] mmc0: SDHCI controller on 8804000.mmc [8804000.mmc] using ADMA 64-bit
[    5.889494] x1e80100-tlmm f100000.pinctrl: pin GPIO_71 already requested by f100000.pinctrl:665; cannot claim for 8804000.mmc
[    5.901103] x1e80100-tlmm f100000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: pin-71 (8804000.mmc)
[    5.913184] x1e80100-tlmm f100000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: could not request pin 71 (GPIO_71) from group gpio71 on device f100000.pinctrl
[    5.913186] sdhci_msm 8804000.mmc: Error applying setting, reverse things back
[    5.913188] x1e80100-tlmm f100000.pinctrl: pin GPIO_71 already requested by f100000.pinctrl:665; cannot claim for 8804000.mmc
[    5.929538] x1e80100-tlmm f100000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: pin-71 (8804000.mmc)
[    5.948557] x1e80100-tlmm f100000.pinctrl: error -EINVAL: could not request pin 71 (GPIO_71) from group gpio71 on device f100000.pinctrl
[    5.955983] sdhci_msm 8804000.mmc: Error applying setting, reverse things back
[    5.975984] sdhci_msm 8804000.mmc: failed to activate pinctrl state sleep

Neil