security/min_addr.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
Use max() to reduce the code in update_mmap_min_addr() and improve its
readability.
Signed-off-by: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@vivo.com>
---
security/min_addr.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/min_addr.c b/security/min_addr.c
index df1bc643d886..50035bc9281c 100644
--- a/security/min_addr.c
+++ b/security/min_addr.c
@@ -16,10 +16,7 @@ unsigned long dac_mmap_min_addr = CONFIG_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR;
static void update_mmap_min_addr(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR
- if (dac_mmap_min_addr > CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR)
- mmap_min_addr = dac_mmap_min_addr;
- else
- mmap_min_addr = CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR;
+ mmap_min_addr = max(dac_mmap_min_addr, CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR);
#else
mmap_min_addr = dac_mmap_min_addr;
#endif
--
2.34.1
On Aug 14, 2025 Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@vivo.com> wrote: > > Use max() to reduce the code in update_mmap_min_addr() and improve its > readability. > > Signed-off-by: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@vivo.com> > --- > security/min_addr.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/min_addr.c b/security/min_addr.c > index df1bc643d886..50035bc9281c 100644 > --- a/security/min_addr.c > +++ b/security/min_addr.c > @@ -16,10 +16,7 @@ unsigned long dac_mmap_min_addr = CONFIG_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR; > static void update_mmap_min_addr(void) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR > - if (dac_mmap_min_addr > CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR) > - mmap_min_addr = dac_mmap_min_addr; > - else > - mmap_min_addr = CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR; > + mmap_min_addr = max(dac_mmap_min_addr, CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR); It seems like the umax() macro would be a better choice here, yes? It might also be a good idea to explicitly include the include/linux/minmax.h header in this file. > #else > mmap_min_addr = dac_mmap_min_addr; > #endif > -- > 2.34.1 -- paul-moore.com
在 2025/8/15 10:17, Paul Moore 写道: > On Aug 14, 2025 Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@vivo.com> wrote: >> Use max() to reduce the code in update_mmap_min_addr() and improve its >> readability. >> >> Signed-off-by: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@vivo.com> >> --- >> security/min_addr.c | 5 +---- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/security/min_addr.c b/security/min_addr.c >> index df1bc643d886..50035bc9281c 100644 >> --- a/security/min_addr.c >> +++ b/security/min_addr.c >> @@ -16,10 +16,7 @@ unsigned long dac_mmap_min_addr = CONFIG_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR; >> static void update_mmap_min_addr(void) >> { >> #ifdef CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR >> - if (dac_mmap_min_addr > CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR) >> - mmap_min_addr = dac_mmap_min_addr; >> - else >> - mmap_min_addr = CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR; >> + mmap_min_addr = max(dac_mmap_min_addr, CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR); > It seems like the umax() macro would be a better choice here, yes? You are right, using umax() here makes the semantics clearer. > > It might also be a good idea to explicitly include the > include/linux/minmax.h header in this file. ok, Will do in the next version. > >> #else >> mmap_min_addr = dac_mmap_min_addr; >> #endif >> -- >> 2.34.1 > -- > paul-moore.com Best regards, Qianfeng
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.