Remove the duplicate definition of BTINTEL_PCIE_MAGIC_NUM macro.
The macro is defined twice with the same value (0xA5A5A5A5) which
is redundant and should be cleaned up.

Fixes: b9465e6670a2 ("Bluetooth: btintel_pcie: Read hardware exception data")
Signed-off-by: Jun Zhan <zhanjun@uniontech.com>
Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>

------
PS: I don`t know why not show a gcc redefined warning or error?
------
---
 drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
index 6e7bbbd35279..758fbf3fb55a 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
@@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ struct btintel_pcie_dev_recovery {
 #define BTINTEL_PCIE_SCP_HWEXP_SIZE		4096
 #define BTINTEL_PCIE_SCP_HWEXP_DMP_ADDR		0xB030F800
 
-#define BTINTEL_PCIE_MAGIC_NUM	0xA5A5A5A5
-
 #define BTINTEL_PCIE_TRIGGER_REASON_USER_TRIGGER	0x17A2
 #define BTINTEL_PCIE_TRIGGER_REASON_FW_ASSERT		0x1E61
 
-- 
2.20.1

Dear Wentao,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 12.08.25 um 14:43 schrieb Wentao Guan:
> Remove the duplicate definition of BTINTEL_PCIE_MAGIC_NUM macro.
> The macro is defined twice with the same value (0xA5A5A5A5) which
> is redundant and should be cleaned up.
> 
> Fixes: b9465e6670a2 ("Bluetooth: btintel_pcie: Read hardware exception data")
> Signed-off-by: Jun Zhan <zhanjun@uniontech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
> 
> ------
> PS: I don`t know why not show a gcc redefined warning or error?

Macros are processed by the preprocessor, and are no variables. But 
maybe I am wrong.

> ------
> ---
>   drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c | 2 --
>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
> index 6e7bbbd35279..758fbf3fb55a 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ struct btintel_pcie_dev_recovery {
>   #define BTINTEL_PCIE_SCP_HWEXP_SIZE		4096
>   #define BTINTEL_PCIE_SCP_HWEXP_DMP_ADDR		0xB030F800
>   
> -#define BTINTEL_PCIE_MAGIC_NUM	0xA5A5A5A5
> -
>   #define BTINTEL_PCIE_TRIGGER_REASON_USER_TRIGGER	0x17A2
>   #define BTINTEL_PCIE_TRIGGER_REASON_FW_ASSERT		0x1E61
>   

Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>


Kind regards,

Paul

Dear Paul,

Thanks for you review,

> > PS: I don`t know why not show a gcc redefined warning or error?
> 
> Macros are processed by the preprocessor, and are no variables. But 
> maybe I am wrong.
Right, "If a macro is redefined with a definition that is not effectively 
the same as the old one, the preprocessor issues a warning and 
changes the macro to use the new definition. "
From GCC docs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Undefining-and-Redefining-Macros.html

Best Regards
Wentao Guan