block/blk-mq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in comment text.
Signed-off-by: Xichao Zhao <zhao.xichao@vivo.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9692fa4c3ef2..adb26eab67d8 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2361,7 +2361,7 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_run_hw_queue);
/*
- * Return prefered queue to dispatch from (if any) for non-mq aware IO
+ * Return preferred queue to dispatch from (if any) for non-mq aware IO
* scheduler.
*/
static struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_mq_get_sq_hctx(struct request_queue *q)
--
2.34.1
On 8/12/25 2:18 AM, Xichao Zhao wrote: > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in comment text. > > Signed-off-by: Xichao Zhao <zhao.xichao@vivo.com> > --- > block/blk-mq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > index 9692fa4c3ef2..adb26eab67d8 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > @@ -2361,7 +2361,7 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_run_hw_queue); > > /* > - * Return prefered queue to dispatch from (if any) for non-mq aware IO > + * Return preferred queue to dispatch from (if any) for non-mq aware IO > * scheduler. > */ > static struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_mq_get_sq_hctx(struct request_queue *q) This patch conflicts with one of my patch series so it would help me if this patch would not be applied. I can integrate this patch in my patch that modifies the behavior of this function. See also https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250811200851.626402-5-bvanassche@acm.org/T/#u Bart.
在 2025/8/12 23:25, Bart Van Assche 写道: > > On 8/12/25 2:18 AM, Xichao Zhao wrote: >> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in comment text. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xichao Zhao <zhao.xichao@vivo.com> >> --- >> block/blk-mq.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c >> index 9692fa4c3ef2..adb26eab67d8 100644 >> --- a/block/blk-mq.c >> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c >> @@ -2361,7 +2361,7 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx >> *hctx, bool async) >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_run_hw_queue); >> >> /* >> - * Return prefered queue to dispatch from (if any) for non-mq aware IO >> + * Return preferred queue to dispatch from (if any) for non-mq aware IO >> * scheduler. >> */ >> static struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_mq_get_sq_hctx(struct >> request_queue *q) > > This patch conflicts with one of my patch series so it would help me if > this patch would not be applied. I can integrate this patch in my patch > that modifies the behavior of this function. See also > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250811200851.626402-5-bvanassche@acm.org/T/#u > > > Bart. Okay, if possible, please integrate this patch into your patch. Thank you. Xichao Zhao.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.