mm/vmscan.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
When !folio_is_file_lru(folio) is false, it implies that
!folio_test_swapbacked(folio) must be true. Therefore, the additional
check for !folio_test_swapbacked(folio) is redundant and can be safely
removed.
This cleanup simplifies the code without changing any functionality.
Signed-off-by: Jialin Wang <wjl.linux@gmail.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 7de11524a936..9d4745ad5e23 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -985,8 +985,7 @@ static void folio_check_dirty_writeback(struct folio *folio,
* They could be mistakenly treated as file lru. So further anon
* test is needed.
*/
- if (!folio_is_file_lru(folio) ||
- (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))) {
+ if (!folio_is_file_lru(folio) || folio_test_anon(folio)) {
*dirty = false;
*writeback = false;
return;
--
2.50.0
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 2:18 AM Jialin Wang <wjl.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > > When !folio_is_file_lru(folio) is false, it implies that > !folio_test_swapbacked(folio) must be true. Therefore, the additional > check for !folio_test_swapbacked(folio) is redundant and can be safely > removed. > > This cleanup simplifies the code without changing any functionality. > > Signed-off-by: Jialin Wang <wjl.linux@gmail.com> > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 7de11524a936..9d4745ad5e23 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -985,8 +985,7 @@ static void folio_check_dirty_writeback(struct folio *folio, > * They could be mistakenly treated as file lru. So further anon > * test is needed. > */ > - if (!folio_is_file_lru(folio) || > - (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))) { > + if (!folio_is_file_lru(folio) || folio_test_anon(folio)) { > *dirty = false; > *writeback = false; > return; > -- > 2.50.0 > My apologies for sending this patch to the wrong mailing list and missing proper cc's. Please disregard this patch as I've now resent it correctly. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250811182500.42670-1-wjl.linux@gmail.com/ Thank you for your understanding, and sorry for the noise. Best regards, Jialin Wang
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.