[PATCH v8 06/32] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization into new helper function

Tony Luck posted 32 patches 1 month, 3 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v8 06/32] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization into new helper function
Posted by Tony Luck 1 month, 3 weeks ago
All resctrl monitor events are associated with the L3 resource, but
this is about to change.

To prepare for additional types of monitoring domains, move open coded L3
resource monitoring domain initialization from domain_add_cpu_mon() into
a new helper l3_mon_domain_setup() called by domain_add_cpu_mon().

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
index 420e4eb7c160..66270c230b4e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
@@ -496,34 +496,13 @@ static void domain_add_cpu_ctrl(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
 	}
 }
 
-static void domain_add_cpu_mon(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
+static void l3_mon_domain_setup(int cpu, int id, struct rdt_resource *r, struct list_head *add_pos)
 {
-	int id = get_domain_id_from_scope(cpu, r->mon_scope);
-	struct list_head *add_pos = NULL;
 	struct rdt_hw_mon_domain *hw_dom;
-	struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr;
 	struct rdt_mon_domain *d;
 	struct cacheinfo *ci;
 	int err;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&domain_list_lock);
-
-	if (id < 0) {
-		pr_warn_once("Can't find monitor domain id for CPU:%d scope:%d for resource %s\n",
-			     cpu, r->mon_scope, r->name);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	hdr = resctrl_find_domain(&r->mon_domains, id, &add_pos);
-	if (hdr) {
-		if (!domain_header_is_valid(hdr, RESCTRL_MON_DOMAIN, r->rid))
-			return;
-		d = container_of(hdr, struct rdt_mon_domain, hdr);
-
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &d->hdr.cpu_mask);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	hw_dom = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*hw_dom), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
 	if (!hw_dom)
 		return;
@@ -558,6 +537,39 @@ static void domain_add_cpu_mon(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
 	}
 }
 
+static void domain_add_cpu_mon(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
+{
+	int id = get_domain_id_from_scope(cpu, r->mon_scope);
+	struct list_head *add_pos = NULL;
+	struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&domain_list_lock);
+
+	if (id < 0) {
+		pr_warn_once("Can't find monitor domain id for CPU:%d scope:%d for resource %s\n",
+			     cpu, r->mon_scope, r->name);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	hdr = resctrl_find_domain(&r->mon_domains, id, &add_pos);
+	if (hdr) {
+		if (!domain_header_is_valid(hdr, RESCTRL_MON_DOMAIN, r->rid))
+			return;
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &hdr->cpu_mask);
+
+		return;
+	}
+
+	switch (r->rid) {
+	case RDT_RESOURCE_L3:
+		l3_mon_domain_setup(cpu, id, r, add_pos);
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
 static void domain_add_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
 {
 	if (r->alloc_capable)
-- 
2.50.1
Re: [PATCH v8 06/32] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization into new helper function
Posted by Reinette Chatre 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Hi Tony,

On 8/11/25 11:16 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> +static void domain_add_cpu_mon(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> +	int id = get_domain_id_from_scope(cpu, r->mon_scope);
> +	struct list_head *add_pos = NULL;
> +	struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&domain_list_lock);
> +
> +	if (id < 0) {
> +		pr_warn_once("Can't find monitor domain id for CPU:%d scope:%d for resource %s\n",
> +			     cpu, r->mon_scope, r->name);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	hdr = resctrl_find_domain(&r->mon_domains, id, &add_pos);
> +	if (hdr) {
> +		if (!domain_header_is_valid(hdr, RESCTRL_MON_DOMAIN, r->rid))
> +			return;
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &hdr->cpu_mask);
> +
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	switch (r->rid) {
> +	case RDT_RESOURCE_L3:
> +		l3_mon_domain_setup(cpu, id, r, add_pos);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);

As mentioned in v7 feedback [1] this change is inconsistent with similar change
to partner function domain_remove_cpu_mon(). Since you did not respond I expected the
code to be consistent in this version. Specifically, this can be:
		pr_warn_once("Unknown resource rid=%d\n", r->rid);
Reinette

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6ac15beb-7306-4507-b88b-b6f6cca66def@intel.com/