In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer
values into the kernel log.
Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue.
Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
acquire sleeping locks in atomic contexts.

Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer and
easier to reason about.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
---
Changes in v2:
- Rebase on v6.17-rc1
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250718-restricted-pointers-soc-v1-1-c0d0d0bc2e39@linutronix.de
---
 drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
index d7634bf5413a3421da296103fc1591030cd00cbc..038576805bfa0f8dece569cf6faecedfb43a392f 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static int pruss_of_setup_memories(struct device *dev, struct pruss *pruss)
 		pruss->mem_regions[i].pa = res.start;
 		pruss->mem_regions[i].size = resource_size(&res);
 
-		dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: pa %pa size 0x%zx va %pK\n",
+		dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: pa %pa size 0x%zx va %p\n",
 			mem_names[i], &pruss->mem_regions[i].pa,
 			pruss->mem_regions[i].size, pruss->mem_regions[i].va);
 	}

---
base-commit: 8f5ae30d69d7543eee0d70083daf4de8fe15d585
change-id: 20250718-restricted-pointers-soc-499748d55cbc

Best regards,
-- 
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>

Hi Thomas Weißschuh,

On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:48:30 +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer
> values into the kernel log.
> Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
> the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue.
> Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
> through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
> acquire sleeping locks in atomic contexts.
> 
> [...]

I have applied the following to branch ti-drivers-soc-next on [1].
Thank you!

[1/1] soc: ti: pruss: don't use %pK through printk
      commit: a5039648f86424885aae37f03dc39bc9cb972ecb

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
https://ti.com/opensource