On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 12:14:40PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> This series applies the suggestion from Benno [1] and various other
> improvements I found when looking over the LockClassKey implementation.
>
> Based on rust-next.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DBIJLR7XNI6U.21PMPODHE83DZ@kernel.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Queued in rust-locking:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/boqun/linux.git rust-locking
For further testing and reviewing. Thanks!
Regards,
Boqun
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix duplicated "require" in commit message.
> - Mention pinning in macro safety comment.
> - Rebase on v6.17-rc1.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250728-lock-class-key-cleanup-v2-0-ad02b80c69e1@google.com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Change safety comment to require a static object. Adjust commit
> message accordingly.
> - Add Reviewed-by.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250723-lock-class-key-cleanup-v1-0-85fa506b8ca4@google.com
>
> ---
> Alice Ryhl (2):
> rust: sync: refactor static_lock_class!() macro
> rust: sync: clean up LockClassKey and its docs
>
> rust/kernel/sync.rs | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 8f5ae30d69d7543eee0d70083daf4de8fe15d585
> change-id: 20250723-lock-class-key-cleanup-a3baf53b123a
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
>