[PATCH -rebased 07/15] sched_ext: Add a DL server for sched_ext tasks

Joel Fernandes posted 15 patches 1 month, 3 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH -rebased 07/15] sched_ext: Add a DL server for sched_ext tasks
Posted by Joel Fernandes 1 month, 3 weeks ago
sched_ext currently suffers starvation due to RT. The same workload when
converted to EXT can get zero runtime if RT is 100% running, causing EXT
processes to stall. Fix it by adding a DL server for EXT.

A kselftest is also provided later to verify:

./runner -t rt_stall
===== START =====
TEST: rt_stall
DESCRIPTION: Verify that RT tasks cannot stall SCHED_EXT tasks
OUTPUT:
TAP version 13
1..1
ok 1 PASS: CFS task got more than 4.00% of runtime

Cc: Luigi De Matteis <ldematteis123@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     |  3 ++
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |  2 +-
 kernel/sched/ext.c      | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f3a26d13b926..ce5b51faf9d5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8808,6 +8808,9 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 		hrtick_rq_init(rq);
 		atomic_set(&rq->nr_iowait, 0);
 		fair_server_init(rq);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
+		ext_server_init(rq);
+#endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
 		rq->core = rq;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 8b3535b8fca9..00bafa434fb8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64
 	 * The fair server (sole dl_server) does not account for real-time
 	 * workload because it is running fair work.
 	 */
-	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server)
+	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server || dl_se == &rq->ext_server)
 		return;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index f6a55cb823d8..1f68f9e69d03 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1923,6 +1923,9 @@ static void update_curr_scx(struct rq *rq)
 		if (!curr->scx.slice)
 			touch_core_sched(rq, curr);
 	}
+
+	if (dl_server_active(&rq->ext_server))
+		dl_server_update(&rq->ext_server, delta_exec);
 }
 
 static bool scx_dsq_priq_less(struct rb_node *node_a,
@@ -2410,6 +2413,15 @@ static void enqueue_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int enq_flags
 	if (enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_WAKEUP)
 		touch_core_sched(rq, p);
 
+	if (rq->scx.nr_running == 1) {
+		/* Account for idle runtime */
+		if (!rq->nr_running)
+			dl_server_update_idle_time(rq, rq->curr, &rq->ext_server);
+
+		/* Start dl_server if this is the first task being enqueued */
+		dl_server_start(&rq->ext_server);
+	}
+
 	do_enqueue_task(rq, p, enq_flags, sticky_cpu);
 out:
 	rq->scx.flags &= ~SCX_RQ_IN_WAKEUP;
@@ -2509,6 +2521,11 @@ static bool dequeue_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int deq_flags
 	sub_nr_running(rq, 1);
 
 	dispatch_dequeue(rq, p);
+
+	/* Stop the server if this was the last task */
+	if (rq->scx.nr_running == 0)
+		dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -4045,6 +4062,15 @@ static void switching_to_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 static void switched_from_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	scx_disable_task(p);
+
+	/*
+	 * After class switch, if the DL server is still active, restart it so
+	 * that DL timers will be queued, in case SCX switched to higher class.
+	 */
+	if (dl_server_active(&rq->ext_server)) {
+		dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
+		dl_server_start(&rq->ext_server);
+	}
 }
 
 static void wakeup_preempt_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,int wake_flags) {}
@@ -7315,8 +7341,8 @@ __bpf_kfunc u32 scx_bpf_cpuperf_cur(s32 cpu)
  * relative scale between 0 and %SCX_CPUPERF_ONE. This determines how the
  * schedutil cpufreq governor chooses the target frequency.
  *
- * The actual performance level chosen, CPU grouping, and the overhead and
- * latency of the operations are dependent on the hardware and cpufreq driver in
+ * The actual performance level chosen, CPU grouping, and the overhead and latency
+ * of the operations are dependent on the hardware and cpufreq driver in
  * use. Consult hardware and cpufreq documentation for more information. The
  * current performance level can be monitored using scx_bpf_cpuperf_cur().
  */
@@ -7642,6 +7668,38 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_now)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_events, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
 BTF_KFUNCS_END(scx_kfunc_ids_any)
 
+/*
+ * Check if ext scheduler has tasks ready to run.
+ */
+static bool ext_server_has_tasks(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+{
+	return !!dl_se->rq->scx.nr_running;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Select the next task to run from the ext scheduling class.
+ */
+static struct task_struct *ext_server_pick_task(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
+						void *flags)
+{
+	struct rq_flags *rf = flags;
+
+	balance_scx(dl_se->rq, dl_se->rq->curr, rf);
+	return pick_task_scx(dl_se->rq, rf);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Initialize the ext server deadline entity.
+ */
+void ext_server_init(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &rq->ext_server;
+
+	init_dl_entity(dl_se);
+
+	dl_server_init(dl_se, rq, ext_server_has_tasks, ext_server_pick_task);
+}
+
 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set scx_kfunc_set_any = {
 	.owner			= THIS_MODULE,
 	.set			= &scx_kfunc_ids_any,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 2c73d538f34e..51ac373554de 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ extern void dl_server_update_idle_time(struct rq *rq,
 		    struct task_struct *p,
 		    struct sched_dl_entity *rq_dl_server);
 extern void fair_server_init(struct rq *rq);
+extern void ext_server_init(struct rq *rq);
 extern void __dl_server_attach_root(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq);
 extern int dl_server_apply_params(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
 		    u64 runtime, u64 period, bool init);
@@ -1125,6 +1126,7 @@ struct rq {
 #endif
 
 	struct sched_dl_entity	fair_server;
+	struct sched_dl_entity	ext_server;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 	/* list of leaf cfs_rq on this CPU: */
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH -rebased 07/15] sched_ext: Add a DL server for sched_ext tasks
Posted by Peter Zijlstra 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 02:47:52PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:

> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64
>  	 * The fair server (sole dl_server) does not account for real-time
>  	 * workload because it is running fair work.
>  	 */
> -	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server)
> +	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server || dl_se == &rq->ext_server)
>  		return;

Does that want to be: if (dl_se->dl_server) ?

>
Re: [PATCH -rebased 07/15] sched_ext: Add a DL server for sched_ext tasks
Posted by Joel Fernandes 1 month, 2 weeks ago

On 8/19/2025 3:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 02:47:52PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> 
>> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> @@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64
>>  	 * The fair server (sole dl_server) does not account for real-time
>>  	 * workload because it is running fair work.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server)
>> +	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server || dl_se == &rq->ext_server)
>>  		return;
> 
> Does that want to be: if (dl_se->dl_server) ?
> 

Yes, that sounds good to me. Andrea, while you're at it could you roll this
change in too? I'll pick up your branch once I am back from travel next week.

thanks,

 - Joel
Re: [PATCH -rebased 07/15] sched_ext: Add a DL server for sched_ext tasks
Posted by Andrea Righi 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 11:22:16PM +0530, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/19/2025 3:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 02:47:52PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > 
> >> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> >> @@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64
> >>  	 * The fair server (sole dl_server) does not account for real-time
> >>  	 * workload because it is running fair work.
> >>  	 */
> >> -	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server)
> >> +	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server || dl_se == &rq->ext_server)
> >>  		return;
> > 
> > Does that want to be: if (dl_se->dl_server) ?
> > 
> 
> Yes, that sounds good to me. Andrea, while you're at it could you roll this
> change in too? I'll pick up your branch once I am back from travel next week.

Done already, have a safe trip. :)

-Andrea
Re: [PATCH -rebased 07/15] sched_ext: Add a DL server for sched_ext tasks
Posted by Andrea Righi 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 09:57:14AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 02:47:52PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> 
> > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > @@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64
> >  	 * The fair server (sole dl_server) does not account for real-time
> >  	 * workload because it is running fair work.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server)
> > +	if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server || dl_se == &rq->ext_server)
> >  		return;
> 
> Does that want to be: if (dl_se->dl_server) ?

Makes sense to me.

I just tested it (even added a WARN_ON() to be 100% sure the check is
equivalent), and everything seems to work as expected.

Thanks!
-Andrea