drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 16 +++++++--------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Commit ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue
daemon") allowed each ublk I/O to have an independent daemon task.
However, nr_privileged_daemon is only computed based on whether the last
I/O fetched in each ublk queue has an unprivileged daemon task.
Fix this by checking whether every fetched I/O's daemon is privileged.
Change nr_privileged_daemon from a count of queues to a boolean
indicating whether any I/Os have an unprivileged daemon.
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Fixes: ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue daemon")
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 6561d2a561fa..a035070dd690 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -233,11 +233,11 @@ struct ublk_device {
struct ublk_params params;
struct completion completion;
unsigned int nr_queues_ready;
- unsigned int nr_privileged_daemon;
+ bool unprivileged_daemons;
struct mutex cancel_mutex;
bool canceling;
pid_t ublksrv_tgid;
};
@@ -1548,11 +1548,11 @@ static void ublk_reset_ch_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
ublk_queue_reinit(ub, ublk_get_queue(ub, i));
/* set to NULL, otherwise new tasks cannot mmap io_cmd_buf */
ub->mm = NULL;
ub->nr_queues_ready = 0;
- ub->nr_privileged_daemon = 0;
+ ub->unprivileged_daemons = false;
ub->ublksrv_tgid = -1;
}
static struct gendisk *ublk_get_disk(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
@@ -1978,16 +1978,14 @@ static void ublk_reset_io_flags(struct ublk_device *ub)
/* device can only be started after all IOs are ready */
static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
__must_hold(&ub->mutex)
{
ubq->nr_io_ready++;
- if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) {
+ if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq))
ub->nr_queues_ready++;
-
- if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
- ub->nr_privileged_daemon++;
- }
+ if (!ub->unprivileged_daemons && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ ub->unprivileged_daemons = true;
if (ub->nr_queues_ready == ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues) {
/* now we are ready for handling ublk io request */
ublk_reset_io_flags(ub);
complete_all(&ub->completion);
@@ -2878,12 +2876,12 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ublksrv_pid;
ub->ub_disk = disk;
ublk_apply_params(ub);
- /* don't probe partitions if any one ubq daemon is un-trusted */
- if (ub->nr_privileged_daemon != ub->nr_queues_ready)
+ /* don't probe partitions if any daemon task is un-trusted */
+ if (ub->unprivileged_daemons)
set_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN, &disk->state);
ublk_get_device(ub);
ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
--
2.45.2
On Fri, 08 Aug 2025 09:52:15 -0600, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: > Commit ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue > daemon") allowed each ublk I/O to have an independent daemon task. > However, nr_privileged_daemon is only computed based on whether the last > I/O fetched in each ublk queue has an unprivileged daemon task. > Fix this by checking whether every fetched I/O's daemon is privileged. > Change nr_privileged_daemon from a count of queues to a boolean > indicating whether any I/Os have an unprivileged daemon. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] ublk: check for unprivileged daemon on each I/O fetch commit: 5058a62875e1916e5133a1639f0207ea2148c0bc Best regards, -- Jens Axboe
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 09:52:15AM -0600, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: > Commit ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue > daemon") allowed each ublk I/O to have an independent daemon task. > However, nr_privileged_daemon is only computed based on whether the last > I/O fetched in each ublk queue has an unprivileged daemon task. > Fix this by checking whether every fetched I/O's daemon is privileged. > Change nr_privileged_daemon from a count of queues to a boolean > indicating whether any I/Os have an unprivileged daemon. > > Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com> > Fixes: ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue daemon") Looks fine, Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Thanks, Ming
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 09:52:15AM -0600, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: > Commit ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue > daemon") allowed each ublk I/O to have an independent daemon task. > However, nr_privileged_daemon is only computed based on whether the last > I/O fetched in each ublk queue has an unprivileged daemon task. > Fix this by checking whether every fetched I/O's daemon is privileged. > Change nr_privileged_daemon from a count of queues to a boolean > indicating whether any I/Os have an unprivileged daemon. > > Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com> > Fixes: ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue daemon") Nice catch! > --- > drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 16 +++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c > index 6561d2a561fa..a035070dd690 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c > @@ -233,11 +233,11 @@ struct ublk_device { > > struct ublk_params params; > > struct completion completion; > unsigned int nr_queues_ready; > - unsigned int nr_privileged_daemon; > + bool unprivileged_daemons; > struct mutex cancel_mutex; > bool canceling; > pid_t ublksrv_tgid; > }; > > @@ -1548,11 +1548,11 @@ static void ublk_reset_ch_dev(struct ublk_device *ub) > ublk_queue_reinit(ub, ublk_get_queue(ub, i)); > > /* set to NULL, otherwise new tasks cannot mmap io_cmd_buf */ > ub->mm = NULL; > ub->nr_queues_ready = 0; > - ub->nr_privileged_daemon = 0; > + ub->unprivileged_daemons = false; > ub->ublksrv_tgid = -1; > } > > static struct gendisk *ublk_get_disk(struct ublk_device *ub) > { > @@ -1978,16 +1978,14 @@ static void ublk_reset_io_flags(struct ublk_device *ub) > /* device can only be started after all IOs are ready */ > static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq) > __must_hold(&ub->mutex) > { > ubq->nr_io_ready++; > - if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) { > + if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) > ub->nr_queues_ready++; > - > - if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > - ub->nr_privileged_daemon++; > - } > + if (!ub->unprivileged_daemons && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > + ub->unprivileged_daemons = true; Shorter: ub->unprivileged_daemons |= !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); > > if (ub->nr_queues_ready == ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues) { > /* now we are ready for handling ublk io request */ > ublk_reset_io_flags(ub); > complete_all(&ub->completion); > @@ -2878,12 +2876,12 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub, > ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ublksrv_pid; > ub->ub_disk = disk; > > ublk_apply_params(ub); > > - /* don't probe partitions if any one ubq daemon is un-trusted */ > - if (ub->nr_privileged_daemon != ub->nr_queues_ready) > + /* don't probe partitions if any daemon task is un-trusted */ > + if (ub->unprivileged_daemons) > set_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN, &disk->state); > > ublk_get_device(ub); > ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE; > > -- > 2.45.2 >
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 2:01 PM Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 09:52:15AM -0600, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: > > Commit ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue > > daemon") allowed each ublk I/O to have an independent daemon task. > > However, nr_privileged_daemon is only computed based on whether the last > > I/O fetched in each ublk queue has an unprivileged daemon task. > > Fix this by checking whether every fetched I/O's daemon is privileged. > > Change nr_privileged_daemon from a count of queues to a boolean > > indicating whether any I/Os have an unprivileged daemon. > > > > Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com> > > Fixes: ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue daemon") > > Nice catch! > > > --- > > drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 16 +++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c > > index 6561d2a561fa..a035070dd690 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c > > @@ -233,11 +233,11 @@ struct ublk_device { > > > > struct ublk_params params; > > > > struct completion completion; > > unsigned int nr_queues_ready; > > - unsigned int nr_privileged_daemon; > > + bool unprivileged_daemons; > > struct mutex cancel_mutex; > > bool canceling; > > pid_t ublksrv_tgid; > > }; > > > > @@ -1548,11 +1548,11 @@ static void ublk_reset_ch_dev(struct ublk_device *ub) > > ublk_queue_reinit(ub, ublk_get_queue(ub, i)); > > > > /* set to NULL, otherwise new tasks cannot mmap io_cmd_buf */ > > ub->mm = NULL; > > ub->nr_queues_ready = 0; > > - ub->nr_privileged_daemon = 0; > > + ub->unprivileged_daemons = false; > > ub->ublksrv_tgid = -1; > > } > > > > static struct gendisk *ublk_get_disk(struct ublk_device *ub) > > { > > @@ -1978,16 +1978,14 @@ static void ublk_reset_io_flags(struct ublk_device *ub) > > /* device can only be started after all IOs are ready */ > > static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq) > > __must_hold(&ub->mutex) > > { > > ubq->nr_io_ready++; > > - if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) { > > + if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) > > ub->nr_queues_ready++; > > - > > - if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > > - ub->nr_privileged_daemon++; > > - } > > + if (!ub->unprivileged_daemons && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > > + ub->unprivileged_daemons = true; > > Shorter: > > ub->unprivileged_daemons |= !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); I was trying to avoid the capable() call if unprivileged_daemons was already set. But maybe that's not a common case and it's not worth optimizing? Best, Caleb > > > > > if (ub->nr_queues_ready == ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues) { > > /* now we are ready for handling ublk io request */ > > ublk_reset_io_flags(ub); > > complete_all(&ub->completion); > > @@ -2878,12 +2876,12 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub, > > ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ublksrv_pid; > > ub->ub_disk = disk; > > > > ublk_apply_params(ub); > > > > - /* don't probe partitions if any one ubq daemon is un-trusted */ > > - if (ub->nr_privileged_daemon != ub->nr_queues_ready) > > + /* don't probe partitions if any daemon task is un-trusted */ > > + if (ub->unprivileged_daemons) > > set_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN, &disk->state); > > > > ublk_get_device(ub); > > ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE; > > > > -- > > 2.45.2 > >
On 8/8/25 12:03 PM, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: > On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 2:01?PM Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 09:52:15AM -0600, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: >>> Commit ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue >>> daemon") allowed each ublk I/O to have an independent daemon task. >>> However, nr_privileged_daemon is only computed based on whether the last >>> I/O fetched in each ublk queue has an unprivileged daemon task. >>> Fix this by checking whether every fetched I/O's daemon is privileged. >>> Change nr_privileged_daemon from a count of queues to a boolean >>> indicating whether any I/Os have an unprivileged daemon. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com> >>> Fixes: ab03a61c6614 ("ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue daemon") >> >> Nice catch! >> >>> --- >>> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 16 +++++++--------- >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c >>> index 6561d2a561fa..a035070dd690 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c >>> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c >>> @@ -233,11 +233,11 @@ struct ublk_device { >>> >>> struct ublk_params params; >>> >>> struct completion completion; >>> unsigned int nr_queues_ready; >>> - unsigned int nr_privileged_daemon; >>> + bool unprivileged_daemons; >>> struct mutex cancel_mutex; >>> bool canceling; >>> pid_t ublksrv_tgid; >>> }; >>> >>> @@ -1548,11 +1548,11 @@ static void ublk_reset_ch_dev(struct ublk_device *ub) >>> ublk_queue_reinit(ub, ublk_get_queue(ub, i)); >>> >>> /* set to NULL, otherwise new tasks cannot mmap io_cmd_buf */ >>> ub->mm = NULL; >>> ub->nr_queues_ready = 0; >>> - ub->nr_privileged_daemon = 0; >>> + ub->unprivileged_daemons = false; >>> ub->ublksrv_tgid = -1; >>> } >>> >>> static struct gendisk *ublk_get_disk(struct ublk_device *ub) >>> { >>> @@ -1978,16 +1978,14 @@ static void ublk_reset_io_flags(struct ublk_device *ub) >>> /* device can only be started after all IOs are ready */ >>> static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq) >>> __must_hold(&ub->mutex) >>> { >>> ubq->nr_io_ready++; >>> - if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) { >>> + if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) >>> ub->nr_queues_ready++; >>> - >>> - if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >>> - ub->nr_privileged_daemon++; >>> - } >>> + if (!ub->unprivileged_daemons && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >>> + ub->unprivileged_daemons = true; >> >> Shorter: >> >> ub->unprivileged_daemons |= !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); > > I was trying to avoid the capable() call if unprivileged_daemons was > already set. But maybe that's not a common case and it's not worth > optimizing? Definitely worth it, you did the right thing. -- Jens Axboe
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.