[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,pcie3-phy: add optional differential phy clocks

Rick Wertenbroek posted 3 patches 1 month, 4 weeks ago
[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,pcie3-phy: add optional differential phy clocks
Posted by Rick Wertenbroek 1 month, 4 weeks ago
Both PHYs can use an alternate reference differential clock, add the clocks
to the DT bindings

Signed-off-by: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,pcie3-phy.yaml   | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,pcie3-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,pcie3-phy.yaml
index d7de8b527c5c..b747930b18f1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,pcie3-phy.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,pcie3-phy.yaml
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ properties:
 
   clocks:
     minItems: 1
-    maxItems: 3
+    maxItems: 5
 
   clock-names:
     minItems: 1
-    maxItems: 3
+    maxItems: 5
 
   data-lanes:
     description: which lanes (by position) should be mapped to which
@@ -82,10 +82,15 @@ allOf:
     then:
       properties:
         clocks:
-          maxItems: 1
+          minItems: 1
+          maxItems: 5
         clock-names:
           items:
             - const: pclk
+            - const: phy0_ref_alt_p
+            - const: phy0_ref_alt_m
+            - const: phy1_ref_alt_p
+            - const: phy1_ref_alt_m
     else:
       properties:
         clocks:
-- 
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,pcie3-phy: add optional differential phy clocks
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month, 4 weeks ago
On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 03:38:21PM +0200, Rick Wertenbroek wrote:
> Both PHYs can use an alternate reference differential clock, add the clocks

I do not see any changes in rockchip,rk3588-pcie3-phy, so your "both" is
either incorrect or ambiguous.

...

> to the DT bindings
> 
  
>    data-lanes:
>      description: which lanes (by position) should be mapped to which
> @@ -82,10 +82,15 @@ allOf:
>      then:
>        properties:
>          clocks:
> -          maxItems: 1
> +          minItems: 1
> +          maxItems: 5
>          clock-names:
>            items:
>              - const: pclk
> +            - const: phy0_ref_alt_p
> +            - const: phy0_ref_alt_m
> +            - const: phy1_ref_alt_p
> +            - const: phy1_ref_alt_m

These are different clock inputs?

>      else:
>        properties:
>          clocks:

You need to update the example as well.

> -- 
> 2.25.1
>
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,pcie3-phy: add optional differential phy clocks
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month, 4 weeks ago
On 07/08/2025 09:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 03:38:21PM +0200, Rick Wertenbroek wrote:
>> Both PHYs can use an alternate reference differential clock, add the clocks
> 
> I do not see any changes in rockchip,rk3588-pcie3-phy, so your "both" is

I meant 3568, the other one.

> either incorrect or ambiguous.
> 
> ...
> 
>> to the DT bindings
>>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,pcie3-phy: add optional differential phy clocks
Posted by Rick Wertenbroek 1 month, 4 weeks ago
On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 9:44 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2025 09:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 03:38:21PM +0200, Rick Wertenbroek wrote:
> >> Both PHYs can use an alternate reference differential clock, add the clocks
> >
> > I do not see any changes in rockchip,rk3588-pcie3-phy, so your "both" is
>
> I meant 3568, the other one.
>

By "both" I meant both PHYs of the RK3588 as the rk3588-pcie-phy is
actually a dual PHY (PHY0 and PHY1 which both can use independent
clocks).

The RK3588 PHY is a dual PHY with two independent PCIe 3.0 x2
interfaces (that can be combined into an x4 or used independently).
The RK3568 PHY is a single PHY with one PCIe 3.0 x2 interface.

The RK3568 already has the bindings for the extra differential clock
for its PHY, but the RK3588 did not, so I added them.

I should maybe rephrase this to make it clearer it applies only to the
RK3588 and that by both PHYs I mean RK3588 PHY0 and PHY1

> > either incorrect or ambiguous.
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> to the DT bindings
> >>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof