Novalake has both desktop and mobile versions.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
---

Note this patch is on top of earlier Wildcatlake patch:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250730150437.4701-1-tony.luck@intel.com/

 arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
index 5367dcbf5b30..e345dbdf933e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
@@ -152,6 +152,9 @@
 
 #define INTEL_WILDCATLAKE_L		IFM(6, 0xD5)
 
+#define INTEL_NOVALAKE			IFM(18, 0x01)
+#define INTEL_NOVALAKE_L		IFM(18, 0x03)
+
 /* "Small Core" Processors (Atom/E-Core) */
 
 #define INTEL_ATOM_BONNELL		IFM(6, 0x1C) /* Diamondville, Pineview */
-- 
2.50.1

On 8/1/2025 9:00 AM, Tony Luck wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
> index 5367dcbf5b30..e345dbdf933e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,9 @@
>  
>  #define INTEL_WILDCATLAKE_L		IFM(6, 0xD5)
>  
> +#define INTEL_NOVALAKE			IFM(18, 0x01)
> +#define INTEL_NOVALAKE_L		IFM(18, 0x03)
> +

Are we planning to add models from newer families closer to their
predecessors? I like the idea of continuing to group them by type. But,
it would inconvenience folks who are trying to find a name based on a
Family-model number. (I guess that would be a minority.)

Diamond rapids (Family 19) was added at the bottom of the file. Should
that be moved closer to its type?

Also, the /* Family 6 */ comment at the top is now misleading.

Dave had briefly suggested ordering the file based on Family, but I am
not sure if he still feels that way.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/40538b12-5929-4f05-b65e-8b807057abd5@intel.com/

>  /* "Small Core" Processors (Atom/E-Core) */
>  
>  #define INTEL_ATOM_BONNELL		IFM(6, 0x1C) /* Diamondville, Pineview */