Introduce offload_usage and corresponding apis to track offload usage
on each USB device. Offload denotes that there is another co-processor
accessing the USB device via the same USB host controller. To optimize
power usage, it's essential to monitor whether the USB device is
actively used by other co-processor. This information is vital when
determining if a USB device can be safely suspended during system power
state transitions.
Signed-off-by: Guan-Yu Lin <guanyulin@google.com>
---
drivers/usb/core/Kconfig | 10 +++
drivers/usb/core/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/usb/core/offload.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/usb/core/usb.c | 1 +
include/linux/usb.h | 18 +++++
5 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/offload.c
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig
index 58e3ca7e4793..d5d38657f929 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig
@@ -143,3 +143,13 @@ config USB_DEFAULT_AUTHORIZATION_MODE
ACPI selecting value 2 is analogous to selecting value 0.
If unsure, keep the default value.
+
+config USB_OFFLOAD
+ bool "Enable USB offload feature"
+ depends on USB
+ depends on USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND
+ help
+ Offload denotes that there is another co-processor accessing the
+ USB device via the same USB host controller, creating the
+ "offloaded USB transfers". Say Y to allow offloaded USB
+ transfers during system sleep (Suspend-to-RAM).
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
index ac006abd13b3..df26c2885dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/Makefile
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ usbcore-y += devio.o notify.o generic.o quirks.o devices.o
usbcore-y += phy.o port.o
usbcore-$(CONFIG_OF) += of.o
+usbcore-$(CONFIG_USB_OFFLOAD) += offload.o
usbcore-$(CONFIG_USB_PCI) += hcd-pci.o
usbcore-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += usb-acpi.o
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/offload.c b/drivers/usb/core/offload.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7c699f1b8d2b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/offload.c
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+/*
+ * offload.c - USB offload related functions
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2025, Google LLC.
+ *
+ * Author: Guan-Yu Lin
+ */
+
+#include <linux/usb.h>
+
+#include "usb.h"
+
+/**
+ * usb_offload_get - increment the offload_usage of a USB device
+ * @udev: the USB device to increment its offload_usage
+ *
+ * Incrementing the offload_usage of a usb_device indicates that offload is
+ * enabled on this usb_device; that is, another entity is actively handling USB
+ * transfers. This information allows the USB driver to adjust its power
+ * management policy based on offload activity.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success. A negative error code otherwise.
+ */
+int usb_offload_get(struct usb_device *udev)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ usb_lock_device(udev);
+ if (udev->state == USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED) {
+ usb_unlock_device(udev);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (udev->state == USB_STATE_SUSPENDED ||
+ udev->offload_at_suspend) {
+ usb_unlock_device(udev);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * offload_usage could only be modified when the device is active, since
+ * it will alter the suspend flow of the device.
+ */
+ ret = usb_autoresume_device(udev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ usb_unlock_device(udev);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ udev->offload_usage++;
+ usb_autosuspend_device(udev);
+ usb_unlock_device(udev);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_offload_get);
+
+/**
+ * usb_offload_put - drop the offload_usage of a USB device
+ * @udev: the USB device to drop its offload_usage
+ *
+ * The inverse operation of usb_offload_get, which drops the offload_usage of
+ * a USB device. This information allows the USB driver to adjust its power
+ * management policy based on offload activity.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success. A negative error code otherwise.
+ */
+int usb_offload_put(struct usb_device *udev)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ usb_lock_device(udev);
+ if (udev->state == USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED) {
+ usb_unlock_device(udev);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (udev->state == USB_STATE_SUSPENDED ||
+ udev->offload_at_suspend) {
+ usb_unlock_device(udev);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * offload_usage could only be modified when the device is active, since
+ * it will alter the suspend flow of the device.
+ */
+ ret = usb_autoresume_device(udev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ usb_unlock_device(udev);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Drop the count when it wasn't 0, ignore the operation otherwise. */
+ if (udev->offload_usage)
+ udev->offload_usage--;
+ usb_autosuspend_device(udev);
+ usb_unlock_device(udev);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_offload_put);
+
+/**
+ * usb_offload_check - check offload activities on a USB device
+ * @udev: the USB device to check its offload activity.
+ *
+ * Check if there are any offload activity on the USB device right now. This
+ * information could be used for power management or other forms of resource
+ * management.
+ *
+ * The caller must hold @udev's device lock. In addition, the caller should
+ * ensure downstream usb devices are all either suspended or marked as
+ * "offload_at_suspend" to ensure the correctness of the return value.
+ *
+ * Returns true on any offload activity, false otherwise.
+ */
+bool usb_offload_check(struct usb_device *udev) __must_hold(&udev->dev->mutex)
+{
+ struct usb_device *child;
+ bool active;
+ int port1;
+
+ usb_hub_for_each_child(udev, port1, child) {
+ usb_lock_device(child);
+ active = usb_offload_check(child);
+ usb_unlock_device(child);
+ if (active)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return !!udev->offload_usage;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_offload_check);
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/usb.c b/drivers/usb/core/usb.c
index fca7735fc660..e6b9ab8b4a34 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/usb.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/usb.c
@@ -670,6 +670,7 @@ struct usb_device *usb_alloc_dev(struct usb_device *parent,
set_dev_node(&dev->dev, dev_to_node(bus->sysdev));
dev->state = USB_STATE_ATTACHED;
dev->lpm_disable_count = 1;
+ dev->offload_usage = 0;
atomic_set(&dev->urbnum, 0);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->ep0.urb_list);
diff --git a/include/linux/usb.h b/include/linux/usb.h
index 9d662c6abb4d..81fc0d93783f 100644
--- a/include/linux/usb.h
+++ b/include/linux/usb.h
@@ -636,6 +636,8 @@ struct usb3_lpm_parameters {
* @do_remote_wakeup: remote wakeup should be enabled
* @reset_resume: needs reset instead of resume
* @port_is_suspended: the upstream port is suspended (L2 or U3)
+ * @offload_at_suspend: offload activities during suspend is enabled.
+ * @offload_usage: number of offload activities happening on this usb device.
* @slot_id: Slot ID assigned by xHCI
* @l1_params: best effor service latency for USB2 L1 LPM state, and L1 timeout.
* @u1_params: exit latencies for USB3 U1 LPM state, and hub-initiated timeout.
@@ -724,6 +726,8 @@ struct usb_device {
unsigned do_remote_wakeup:1;
unsigned reset_resume:1;
unsigned port_is_suspended:1;
+ unsigned offload_at_suspend:1;
+ int offload_usage;
enum usb_link_tunnel_mode tunnel_mode;
struct device_link *usb4_link;
@@ -841,6 +845,20 @@ static inline void usb_mark_last_busy(struct usb_device *udev)
{ }
#endif
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_OFFLOAD)
+int usb_offload_get(struct usb_device *udev);
+int usb_offload_put(struct usb_device *udev);
+bool usb_offload_check(struct usb_device *udev);
+#else
+
+static inline int usb_offload_get(struct usb_device *udev)
+{ return 0; }
+static inline int usb_offload_put(struct usb_device *udev)
+{ return 0; }
+static inline bool usb_offload_check(struct usb_device *udev)
+{ return false; }
+#endif
+
extern int usb_disable_lpm(struct usb_device *udev);
extern void usb_enable_lpm(struct usb_device *udev);
/* Same as above, but these functions lock/unlock the bandwidth_mutex. */
--
2.50.1.565.gc32cd1483b-goog
On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 03:39:31AM +0000, Guan-Yu Lin wrote: > Introduce offload_usage and corresponding apis to track offload usage > on each USB device. Offload denotes that there is another co-processor > accessing the USB device via the same USB host controller. To optimize > power usage, it's essential to monitor whether the USB device is > actively used by other co-processor. This information is vital when > determining if a USB device can be safely suspended during system power > state transitions. > > Signed-off-by: Guan-Yu Lin <guanyulin@google.com> > --- > drivers/usb/core/Kconfig | 10 +++ > drivers/usb/core/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/usb/core/offload.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/usb/core/usb.c | 1 + > include/linux/usb.h | 18 +++++ > 5 files changed, 166 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/usb/core/offload.c > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig > index 58e3ca7e4793..d5d38657f929 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/Kconfig > @@ -143,3 +143,13 @@ config USB_DEFAULT_AUTHORIZATION_MODE > ACPI selecting value 2 is analogous to selecting value 0. > > If unsure, keep the default value. > + > +config USB_OFFLOAD > + bool "Enable USB offload feature" I'm confused, we already have a "USB offload feature" that went into the last kernel release, why do we need a separate config option for this as well? Shouldn't this code only get built if the drivers that need it select it automatically? Forcing distros to configure this isn't generally a good idea if at all possible. > + depends on USB > + depends on USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND > + help > + Offload denotes that there is another co-processor accessing the > + USB device via the same USB host controller, creating the > + "offloaded USB transfers". Say Y to allow offloaded USB > + transfers during system sleep (Suspend-to-RAM). Especially because all "desktops" do not want this code selected, so having it in all distros feels like a waste to me. thanks, greg k-h
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:50 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 03:39:31AM +0000, Guan-Yu Lin wrote: > > + > > +config USB_OFFLOAD > > + bool "Enable USB offload feature" > > I'm confused, we already have a "USB offload feature" that went into the > last kernel release, why do we need a separate config option for this as > well? Shouldn't this code only get built if the drivers that need it > select it automatically? Forcing distros to configure this isn't > generally a good idea if at all possible. > Based on the discussion in v13, a new, separate USB configuration option is required to avoid core USB functions being enabled or disabled via an xhci-specific option. The USB offload feature involves a sideband entity that can access xhci resources, which, from the USB driver's viewpoint, means USB transfers are offloaded to this other entity. Therefore, the name "USB_OFFLOAD" was chosen to reflect this functionality. > > > + depends on USB > > + depends on USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND > > Especially because all "desktops" do not want this code selected, so > having it in all distros feels like a waste to me. > > thanks, > > greg k-h For the config keywords, we could automatically select USB_OFFLOAD once USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND is selected to reduce configuration efforts. Regards, Guan-Yu
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 11:59:00AM +0800, Guan-Yu Lin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:50 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 03:39:31AM +0000, Guan-Yu Lin wrote: > > > + > > > +config USB_OFFLOAD > > > + bool "Enable USB offload feature" > > > > I'm confused, we already have a "USB offload feature" that went into the > > last kernel release, why do we need a separate config option for this as > > well? Shouldn't this code only get built if the drivers that need it > > select it automatically? Forcing distros to configure this isn't > > generally a good idea if at all possible. > > > > Based on the discussion in v13, a new, separate USB configuration > option is required to avoid core USB functions being enabled or > disabled via an xhci-specific option. The USB offload feature involves > a sideband entity that can access xhci resources, which, from the USB > driver's viewpoint, means USB transfers are offloaded to this other > entity. Therefore, the name "USB_OFFLOAD" was chosen to reflect this > functionality. Again, you are increasing the number of config options here, which does not make sense. Why would anyone only want a subset, and not just the whole thing? Yes, USB_OFFLOAD only works today on xhci, and that's fine, so let's just keep it that way. > > > + depends on USB > > > + depends on USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND > > > > Especially because all "desktops" do not want this code selected, so > > having it in all distros feels like a waste to me. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > For the config keywords, we could automatically select USB_OFFLOAD > once USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND is selected to reduce configuration > efforts. select is a nightmare to maintain and understand. Please just reduce configuration efforts by not adding new options at all :) thanks, greg k-h
On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 9:13 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 11:59:00AM +0800, Guan-Yu Lin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:50 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 03:39:31AM +0000, Guan-Yu Lin wrote: > > > > + > > > > +config USB_OFFLOAD > > > > + bool "Enable USB offload feature" > > > > > > I'm confused, we already have a "USB offload feature" that went into the > > > last kernel release, why do we need a separate config option for this as > > > well? Shouldn't this code only get built if the drivers that need it > > > select it automatically? Forcing distros to configure this isn't > > > generally a good idea if at all possible. > > > > > > > Based on the discussion in v13, a new, separate USB configuration > > option is required to avoid core USB functions being enabled or > > disabled via an xhci-specific option. The USB offload feature involves > > a sideband entity that can access xhci resources, which, from the USB > > driver's viewpoint, means USB transfers are offloaded to this other > > entity. Therefore, the name "USB_OFFLOAD" was chosen to reflect this > > functionality. > > Again, you are increasing the number of config options here, which does > not make sense. Why would anyone only want a subset, and not just the > whole thing? > > Yes, USB_OFFLOAD only works today on xhci, and that's fine, so let's > just keep it that way. > > > > > + depends on USB > > > > + depends on USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND > > > > > > Especially because all "desktops" do not want this code selected, so > > > having it in all distros feels like a waste to me. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > For the config keywords, we could automatically select USB_OFFLOAD > > once USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND is selected to reduce configuration > > efforts. > > select is a nightmare to maintain and understand. Please just reduce > configuration efforts by not adding new options at all :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h Thanks for the suggestions. I'll use only USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND to control all the features, including the core USB functions. Regards, Guan-Yu
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.