mm/nommu.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Simple folio conversion to remove a user of PageSlab() and
PageCompound().
Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
---
mm/nommu.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
index 07504d666d6a..a00f8fc316c1 100644
--- a/mm/nommu.c
+++ b/mm/nommu.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ const struct vm_operations_struct generic_file_vm_ops = {
*/
unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp)
{
- struct page *page;
+ struct folio *folio;
/*
* If the object we have should not have ksize performed on it,
@@ -73,22 +73,22 @@ unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp)
if (!objp || !virt_addr_valid(objp))
return 0;
- page = virt_to_head_page(objp);
+ folio = virt_to_folio(objp);
/*
* If the allocator sets PageSlab, we know the pointer came from
* kmalloc().
*/
- if (PageSlab(page))
+ if (folio_test_slab(folio))
return ksize(objp);
/*
- * If it's not a compound page, see if we have a matching VMA
+ * If it's not a compound folio, see if we have a matching VMA
* region. This test is intentionally done in reverse order,
* so if there's no VMA, we still fall through and hand back
- * PAGE_SIZE for 0-order pages.
+ * PAGE_SIZE for 0-order folios.
*/
- if (!PageCompound(page)) {
+ if (!folio_test_large(folio)) {
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
vma = find_vma(current->mm, (unsigned long)objp);
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp)
* The ksize() function is only guaranteed to work for pointers
* returned by kmalloc(). So handle arbitrary pointers here.
*/
- return page_size(page);
+ return folio_size(folio);
}
void vfree(const void *addr)
--
2.43.0
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:26:29 +0000 Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> wrote: > Simple folio conversion to remove a user of PageSlab() and > PageCompound(). > > Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> I have a trivial comment below, but since it is just a trivial one that I don't really care, Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> > --- > mm/nommu.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c > index 07504d666d6a..a00f8fc316c1 100644 > --- a/mm/nommu.c > +++ b/mm/nommu.c > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ const struct vm_operations_struct generic_file_vm_ops = { > */ > unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp) > { > - struct page *page; > + struct folio *folio; > > /* > * If the object we have should not have ksize performed on it, > @@ -73,22 +73,22 @@ unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp) > if (!objp || !virt_addr_valid(objp)) > return 0; > > - page = virt_to_head_page(objp); > + folio = virt_to_folio(objp); > > /* > * If the allocator sets PageSlab, we know the pointer came from > * kmalloc(). > */ > - if (PageSlab(page)) > + if (folio_test_slab(folio)) > return ksize(objp); > > /* > - * If it's not a compound page, see if we have a matching VMA > + * If it's not a compound folio, see if we have a matching VMA Nit. I think "a large folio" rather than "a compound folio" is more consistent and easier to read/understand. No strong opinion, though. > * region. This test is intentionally done in reverse order, > * so if there's no VMA, we still fall through and hand back > - * PAGE_SIZE for 0-order pages. > + * PAGE_SIZE for 0-order folios. > */ > - if (!PageCompound(page)) { > + if (!folio_test_large(folio)) { > struct vm_area_struct *vma; > > vma = find_vma(current->mm, (unsigned long)objp); > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp) > * The ksize() function is only guaranteed to work for pointers > * returned by kmalloc(). So handle arbitrary pointers here. > */ > - return page_size(page); > + return folio_size(folio); > } > > void vfree(const void *addr) > -- > 2.43.0 Thanks, SJ
On 8/1/25 3:35 PM, SeongJae Park wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:26:29 +0000 Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> wrote: > >> Simple folio conversion to remove a user of PageSlab() and >> PageCompound(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> > > I have a trivial comment below, but since it is just a trivial one that I don't > really care, > > Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> > >> /* >> - * If it's not a compound page, see if we have a matching VMA >> + * If it's not a compound folio, see if we have a matching VMA > > Nit. I think "a large folio" rather than "a compound folio" is more consistent > and easier to read/understand. No strong opinion, though. I agree, "large folio" is used throughout the kernel rather than compound folio. I'll send a v2 with this change. Thanks, Sid > >> * region. This test is intentionally done in reverse order, >> * so if there's no VMA, we still fall through and hand back >> - * PAGE_SIZE for 0-order pages. >> + * PAGE_SIZE for 0-order folios. >> */ >> - if (!PageCompound(page)) { >> + if (!folio_test_large(folio)) { >> struct vm_area_struct *vma; >> >> vma = find_vma(current->mm, (unsigned long)objp); >> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp) >> * The ksize() function is only guaranteed to work for pointers >> * returned by kmalloc(). So handle arbitrary pointers here. >> */ >> - return page_size(page); >> + return folio_size(folio); >> } >> >> void vfree(const void *addr) >> -- >> 2.43.0 > > > Thanks, > SJ
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.