Changes in v2:
- Patch #2: rename subject to SC7180 and include SC7180 as well. SC7180
  has one clock less.
- New Patch #3: Split SM8650 and SM8750 to their own file, because these
  are first variants with MCQ.
  Add also MCQ address space, to fully document the hardware.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250730-dt-bindings-ufs-qcom-v1-0-4cec9ff202dc@linaro.org

Description:
The binding for Qualcomm SoC UFS controllers grew and it will grow
further.  It already includes several conditionals, partially for
difference in handling encryption block (ICE, either as phandle or as IO
address space) but it will further grow for MCQ.

See also: lore.kernel.org/r/20250730082229.23475-1-quic_rdwivedi@quicinc.com

The SM8650 is first SoC coming with MCQ, which was missing in the
binding. Document this as well.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

---
Krzysztof Kozlowski (3):
      dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Split common part to qcom,ufs-common.yaml
      dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Split SC7180 and similar
      dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Split SM8650 and similar

 .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml | 167 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sm8650-ufshc.yaml | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++
 .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs-common.yaml   |  67 ++++++++
 .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml          | 185 ++++-----------------
 4 files changed, 446 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: d7af19298454ed155f5cf67201a70f5cf836c842
change-id: 20250730-dt-bindings-ufs-qcom-980795ebd0aa

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Krzysztof,

> The binding for Qualcomm SoC UFS controllers grew and it will grow
> further. It already includes several conditionals, partially for
> difference in handling encryption block (ICE, either as phandle or as
> IO address space) but it will further grow for MCQ.

Which tree did you intend to route this through?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen

On 06/08/2025 04:37, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Krzysztof,
> 
>> The binding for Qualcomm SoC UFS controllers grew and it will grow
>> further. It already includes several conditionals, partially for
>> difference in handling encryption block (ICE, either as phandle or as
>> IO address space) but it will further grow for MCQ.
> 
> Which tree did you intend to route this through?


These are bindings, so please take them via UFS tree. Just like with
every other driver or bindings patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On 06/08/2025 07:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/08/2025 04:37, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>
>> Krzysztof,
>>
>>> The binding for Qualcomm SoC UFS controllers grew and it will grow
>>> further. It already includes several conditionals, partially for
>>> difference in handling encryption block (ICE, either as phandle or as
>>> IO address space) but it will further grow for MCQ.
>>
>> Which tree did you intend to route this through?
> 
> 
> These are bindings, so please take them via UFS tree. Just like with
> every other driver or bindings patch.


Hi Martin,

Did my answer reach you? Any questions about applying/merging?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Krzysztof,

> Did my answer reach you? Any questions about applying/merging?

I'm planning on merging the series later today.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen

Krzysztof,

> The binding for Qualcomm SoC UFS controllers grew and it will grow
> further. It already includes several conditionals, partially for
> difference in handling encryption block (ICE, either as phandle or as
> IO address space) but it will further grow for MCQ.

Applied to 6.18/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen