On 7/30/2025 3:59 AM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Tue Jul 29, 2025 at 11:00 AM CEST, Chaoyi Chen wrote:
>> From: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com>
>>
>> Let's make the ports nodes of cdn_dp in the same style as the other
>> display interface, and match the style of ports's yaml.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi | 12 +++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
>> index 9d5f5b083e3c..edeb177bc433 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
>> @@ -618,7 +618,11 @@ cdn_dp: dp@fec00000 {
>> status = "disabled";
>>
>> ports {
>> - dp_in: port {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + dp_in: port@0 {
>> + reg = <0>;
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> @@ -632,6 +636,12 @@ dp_in_vopl: endpoint@1 {
>> remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_dp>;
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + dp_out: port@1 {
>> + reg = <1>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + };
> Patch 5 adds a single endpoint to dp_out (without a reg property), so it
> seems that #address/#size-cells is not needed?
> If you run ``make CHECK_DTBS=y W=1 rockchip/rk3399-evb-ind.dtb`` it
> should spit out a warning about that.
Exactly! Will remove this in v4.
>
> Cheers,
> Diederik
>
>> };
>> };
>>