drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
When encounters some errors like these:
xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: xHCI dying or halted, can't queue_command
xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: FIXME: allocate a command ring segment
usb usb5-port6: couldn't allocate usb_device
It's hard to know whether xhc_state is dying or halted. So it's better
to print xhc_state's value which can help locate the resaon of the bug.
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com>
---
v2:
- Print xhci->xhc_state with hex style.
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index 94c9c9271658..131e7530ec4a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -4372,7 +4372,8 @@ static int queue_command(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_command *cmd,
if ((xhci->xhc_state & XHCI_STATE_DYING) ||
(xhci->xhc_state & XHCI_STATE_HALTED)) {
- xhci_dbg(xhci, "xHCI dying or halted, can't queue_command\n");
+ xhci_dbg(xhci, "xHCI dying or halted, can't queue_command. state: 0x%x\n",
+ xhci->xhc_state);
return -ESHUTDOWN;
}
--
2.30.2
Hi, On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:01:18 +0800, Su Hui wrote: > When encounters some errors like these: > xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: xHCI dying or halted, can't queue_command > xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: FIXME: allocate a command ring segment > usb usb5-port6: couldn't allocate usb_device > > It's hard to know whether xhc_state is dying or halted. Is it truly a problem? This is the only place which sets XHCI_STATE_DYING that I found in the whole drivers/ tree: xhci_err(xhci, "xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead\n"); xhci->xhc_state |= XHCI_STATE_DYING; And AFAIK such state can only be exited by unbinding the driver. Are there really cases when it's unclear if the HC is dying or not? > So it's better to print xhc_state's value which can help locate the > resaon of the bug. Hmm, any chance you came across bugs that upstream should know about? Regards, Michal
On 2025/7/25 18:03, Michał Pecio wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:01:18 +0800, Su Hui wrote: >> When encounters some errors like these: >> xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: xHCI dying or halted, can't queue_command >> xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: FIXME: allocate a command ring segment >> usb usb5-port6: couldn't allocate usb_device >> >> It's hard to know whether xhc_state is dying or halted. > Is it truly a problem? This is the only place which sets > XHCI_STATE_DYING that I found in the whole drivers/ tree: > > xhci_err(xhci, "xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead\n"); > xhci->xhc_state |= XHCI_STATE_DYING; > > And AFAIK such state can only be exited by unbinding the driver. > Are there really cases when it's unclear if the HC is dying or not? Oh, my fault, I ignored this so obvious error message. :(. Sorry for the noise, Maybe this patch should be removed. > >> So it's better to print xhc_state's value which can help locate the >> resaon of the bug. >> >> Hmm, any chance you came across bugs that upstream should know about? Actually, this bug is specific to the 5.4 version of the kernel and a particular USB camera. I am working to resolve this issue. When the xhci_hcd is initialized, the driver sets xhc_state to "halted", but before the xhci_hcd calls xhci_start, the hub starts Initializing. Hub initialization failed due to xhc_state being halted. Perhaps this issue is caused by hardware... Su Hui
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 19:32:37 +0800, Su Hui wrote: > On 2025/7/25 18:03, Michał Pecio wrote: > >> Hmm, any chance you came across bugs that upstream should know about? > Actually, this bug is specific to the 5.4 version of the kernel and a > particular USB camera. I am working > to resolve this issue. When the xhci_hcd is initialized, the driver sets > xhc_state to "halted", but before > the xhci_hcd calls xhci_start, the hub starts Initializing. Hub > initialization failed due to xhc_state being > halted. Perhaps this issue is caused by hardware... Trying to queue commands before the chip is ready sounds like a SW bug. 5.4 is ancient (and EOL soon), newer releases may have this bug fixed.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 02:01:18PM +0800, Su Hui wrote: > When encounters some errors like these: > xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: xHCI dying or halted, can't queue_command > xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: FIXME: allocate a command ring segment > usb usb5-port6: couldn't allocate usb_device > > It's hard to know whether xhc_state is dying or halted. So it's better > to print xhc_state's value which can help locate the resaon of the bug. > > Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com> > --- > v2: > - Print xhci->xhc_state with hex style. > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c > index 94c9c9271658..131e7530ec4a 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c > @@ -4372,7 +4372,8 @@ static int queue_command(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_command *cmd, > > if ((xhci->xhc_state & XHCI_STATE_DYING) || > (xhci->xhc_state & XHCI_STATE_HALTED)) { > - xhci_dbg(xhci, "xHCI dying or halted, can't queue_command\n"); > + xhci_dbg(xhci, "xHCI dying or halted, can't queue_command. state: 0x%x\n", > + xhci->xhc_state); > return -ESHUTDOWN; > } > > -- > 2.30.2 > Simple enough, let me take this now as I want to close my tree... thanks, greg k-h
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.