This commit introduces an option "--bpf-aux-pause" for loading BPF
program to trigger AUX pause and resume.
After:
perf record -e cs_etm/aux-action=start-paused/ \
--bpf-aux-pause="kretprobe:p:__arm64_sys_openat,kprobe:r:__arm64_sys_openat,tp:r:sched:sched_switch" \
-a -- ls
perf record -e cs_etm/aux-action=start-paused/ \
--bpf-aux-pause="kretprobe:p:__arm64_sys_openat,kprobe:r:__arm64_sys_openat,tp:r:sched:sched_switch" \
--per-thread -- ls
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 6 ++++++
tools/perf/util/record.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 8059bce85a510b2dddc66f1b8b0013276840eddc..793609c0a59e8abcd248608f55e0af03a253138d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -880,7 +880,12 @@ static int record__auxtrace_init(struct record *rec)
if (err)
return err;
- return auxtrace_parse_filters(rec->evlist);
+ err = auxtrace_parse_filters(rec->evlist);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return auxtrace__prepare_bpf(rec->itr,
+ rec->opts.auxtrace_bpf_aux_pause_opts);
}
#else
@@ -2506,6 +2511,10 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
evlist__config(rec->evlist, opts, &callchain_param);
+ err = auxtrace__set_bpf_filter(rec->evlist, opts);
+ if (err)
+ goto out_free_threads;
+
/* Debug message used by test scripts */
pr_debug3("perf record opening and mmapping events\n");
if (record__open(rec) != 0) {
@@ -2579,6 +2588,9 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
if (record__start_threads(rec))
goto out_free_threads;
+ if (auxtrace__enable_bpf())
+ goto out_free_threads;
+
/*
* When perf is starting the traced process, all the events
* (apart from group members) have enable_on_exec=1 set,
@@ -2907,6 +2919,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
}
out_delete_session:
+ auxtrace__cleanup_bpf();
#ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
if (done_fd >= 0) {
fd = done_fd;
@@ -3629,6 +3642,11 @@ static struct option __record_options[] = {
OPT_CALLBACK(0, "off-cpu-thresh", &record.opts, "ms",
"Dump off-cpu samples if off-cpu time exceeds this threshold (in milliseconds). (Default: 500ms)",
record__parse_off_cpu_thresh),
+ OPT_STRING_OPTARG(0, "bpf-aux-pause", &record.opts.auxtrace_bpf_aux_pause_opts,
+ "{kprobe|kretprobe}:{p|r}:function_name\n"
+ "\t\t\t {uprobe|uretprobe}:{p|r}:executable:function_name\n"
+ "\t\t\t {tp|tracepoint}:{p|r}:category:tracepoint\n",
+ "Enable AUX pause with BPF backend", ""),
OPT_END()
};
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index d55482f094bf95ac7b5c5173c1341baeb0fa9c93..f240e48f41a3e7ca5ba81733efc58a25c5c829ba 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -2650,6 +2650,12 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
bpf_counter__install_pe(evsel, idx, fd);
+ /* Update event info into BPF map for AUX trace */
+ if (auxtrace__update_bpf_map(evsel, idx, fd)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_close;
+ }
+
if (unlikely(test_attr__enabled())) {
test_attr__open(&evsel->core.attr, pid, cpu,
fd, group_fd, evsel->open_flags);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/record.h b/tools/perf/util/record.h
index ea3a6c4657eefb743dc3d54b0b791ea39117cc10..1b1c2ed7fcadae8b56408b3b1b154faef3996eb3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/record.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/record.h
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct record_opts {
size_t auxtrace_snapshot_size;
const char *auxtrace_snapshot_opts;
const char *auxtrace_sample_opts;
+ const char *auxtrace_bpf_aux_pause_opts;
bool sample_transaction;
bool use_clockid;
clockid_t clockid;
--
2.34.1
Hello, kernel test robot noticed "perf-sanity-tests.Convert_perf_time_to_TSC.Perf_time_to_TSC.fail" on: commit: e350af63969b875598f0656a20d801bbcaa7bd76 ("[PATCH RESEND v3 5/6] perf record: Support AUX pause and resume with BPF") url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Leo-Yan/perf-core-Make-perf_event_aux_pause-as-external-function/20250725-181647 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250725-perf_aux_pause_resume_bpf_rebase-v3-5-ae21deb49d1a@arm.com/ patch subject: [PATCH RESEND v3 5/6] perf record: Support AUX pause and resume with BPF in testcase: perf-sanity-tests version: with following parameters: perf_compiler: gcc group: group-01 config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-bpf compiler: gcc-12 test machine: 16 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2278G CPU @ 3.40GHz (Coffee Lake-E) with 32G memory (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace) besides, we also noticed other tests failed which can pass on parent: 90bef873a01451e8 e350af63969b875598f0656a20d ---------------- --------------------------- fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs | | | :5 83% 5:5 perf-sanity-tests.Convert_perf_time_to_TSC.Perf_time_to_TSC.fail :5 83% 5:5 perf-sanity-tests.Zstd_perf.data_compression/decompression.fail :5 83% 5:5 perf-sanity-tests.build_id_cache_operations.fail :5 83% 5:5 perf-sanity-tests.daemon_operations.fail :5 83% 5:5 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_metricgroups_test.fail :5 83% 5:5 perf-sanity-tests.perf_diff_tests.fail :5 83% 5:5 perf-sanity-tests.perf_stat_JSON_output_linter.fail :5 83% 5:5 perf-sanity-tests.perf_stat_STD_output_linter.fail If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202507310818.a05d2380-lkp@intel.com 2025-07-30 19:06:25 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-9.4-bpf-e350af63969b875598f0656a20d801bbcaa7bd76/tools/perf/perf test 64 -v 64: Convert perf time to TSC : 64.1: TSC support : Running (2 active) 64.1: TSC support : Ok --- start --- test child forked, pid 7359 Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-9E-D evlist__open() failed ---- end(-1) ---- 64.2: Perf time to TSC : FAILED! The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250731/202507310818.a05d2380-lkp@intel.com -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Hi, On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 03:26:01PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: [...] > 2025-07-30 19:06:25 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-9.4-bpf-e350af63969b875598f0656a20d801bbcaa7bd76/tools/perf/perf test 64 -v > 64: Convert perf time to TSC : > 64.1: TSC support : Running (2 active) > 64.1: TSC support : Ok > --- start --- > test child forked, pid 7359 > Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-9E-D > evlist__open() failed > ---- end(-1) ---- > 64.2: Perf time to TSC : FAILED! I roughly read the job.yaml file, seems it does not install clang. Thus, the building will not enalbe the option BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1. As a result, auxtrace__update_bpf_map() will return a failure. I will fix this issue in next spin. Thanks for test and reporting. Leo > The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250731/202507310818.a05d2380-lkp@intel.com > > > > -- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki >
Hi, On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:11:48AM +0100, Leo Yan wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 03:26:01PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > [...] > > > 2025-07-30 19:06:25 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-9.4-bpf-e350af63969b875598f0656a20d801bbcaa7bd76/tools/perf/perf test 64 -v > > 64: Convert perf time to TSC : > > 64.1: TSC support : Running (2 active) > > 64.1: TSC support : Ok > > --- start --- > > test child forked, pid 7359 > > Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-9E-D > > evlist__open() failed > > ---- end(-1) ---- > > 64.2: Perf time to TSC : FAILED! > > I roughly read the job.yaml file, seems it does not install clang. > Thus, the building will not enalbe the option BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1. > > As a result, auxtrace__update_bpf_map() will return a failure. I will > fix this issue in next spin. > > Thanks for test and reporting. I played a bit and found that if with the option "BUILD_BPF_SKEL := 0", I even failed to build perf (I will fix in new version). I think you should have built perf with enabled BUILD_BPF_SKEL. However, in this case, I cannot reproduce the test failure, both on my x86_64 and Arm64 machines. I reviewed the code and have no clue this patch will cause the failure. Is it possible to run the test at your side with the option "perf test 64 -vvv" for debugging info? Or if it is possible related to the setting kernel.perf_event_paranoid? Thanks, Leo
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.