From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>

The dedicated cpumask_next_wrap() is more verbose and effective than
cpumask_next() followed by cpumask_first().

Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250605000651.45281-1-yury.norov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
index b65353ec2837..2f7b94e98317 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
@@ -325,12 +325,9 @@ static void move_to_next_cpu(void)
 
 	cpus_read_lock();
 	cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tr->tracing_cpumask);
-	next_cpu = cpumask_next(raw_smp_processor_id(), current_mask);
+	next_cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(raw_smp_processor_id(), current_mask);
 	cpus_read_unlock();
 
-	if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-		next_cpu = cpumask_first(current_mask);
-
 	if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) /* Shouldn't happen! */
 		goto change_mode;
 
-- 
2.47.2