I reran the unused tracepoint code on the latest linux-next and found more
xfs trace events. One was recently added but the rest were there before. Not
sure how I missed them.

But anyway, here's a few more patches to remove unused xfs trace events.

Steven Rostedt (4):
      xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_dqreclaim_dirty
      xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_log_cil_return
      xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_discard_rtrelax
      xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_reflink_cow_enospc

----
 fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

The entire series looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 04:19:07PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> I reran the unused tracepoint code on the latest linux-next and found more
> xfs trace events. One was recently added but the rest were there before. Not
> sure how I missed them.
> 
> But anyway, here's a few more patches to remove unused xfs trace events.
> 
> Steven Rostedt (4):
>       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_dqreclaim_dirty
>       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_log_cil_return
>       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_discard_rtrelax
>       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_reflink_cow_enospc

I can directly take responsibility for 1, 3, and 4 -- those aren't going
to come back.  Patch 2 looks like an accidental add, and if anyone wants
it they can always add it back.

Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> 
> ----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>

On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:28:42 -0700
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 04:19:07PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > I reran the unused tracepoint code on the latest linux-next and found more
> > xfs trace events. One was recently added but the rest were there before. Not
> > sure how I missed them.
> > 
> > But anyway, here's a few more patches to remove unused xfs trace events.
> > 
> > Steven Rostedt (4):
> >       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_dqreclaim_dirty
> >       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_log_cil_return
> >       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_discard_rtrelax
> >       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_reflink_cow_enospc  
> 
> I can directly take responsibility for 1, 3, and 4 -- those aren't going
> to come back.  Patch 2 looks like an accidental add, and if anyone wants
> it they can always add it back.
> 
> Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

Thanks. I'm guessing this will also go through the xfs tree?

-- Steve

On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:19:07 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I reran the unused tracepoint code on the latest linux-next and found more
> xfs trace events. One was recently added but the rest were there before. Not
> sure how I missed them.
> 
> But anyway, here's a few more patches to remove unused xfs trace events.
> 
> Steven Rostedt (4):
>       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_dqreclaim_dirty
>       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_log_cil_return
>       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_discard_rtrelax
>       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_reflink_cow_enospc
> 
> [...]

Applied to for-next, thanks!

[1/4] xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_dqreclaim_dirty
      commit: 1edc170bb24082785e5825c46a36af8ae12ac762
[2/4] xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_log_cil_return
      commit: 55edb3326b4b07117d0c26cd67d86fb8518ee906
[3/4] xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_discard_rtrelax
      commit: c17f506f0abe67b6009c0d126da81a71fc1e00c1
[4/4] xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_reflink_cow_enospc
      commit: 10a957e43f28105ceb7b8e31a918d1c47cd4df3e

Best regards,
-- 
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>