On 22/07/2025 19:38, Jesse Taube wrote:
> __read_insn was using get_user for user space reads and direct
> dereferencing for kernel space reads.
> Update to use copy_from_user_nofault, copy_from_kernel_nofault for this
> as get_user is user context only and may sleep.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> Squash with previous commit as it's breaks bisectability.
> Separated as i'm unsure if copy_from_user_nofault is an acceptable
> replacement.
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/insn.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/insn.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/insn.c
> index dd2a6ef9fd25..b8e5202ddced 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/insn.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/insn.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
> /*
> * Copyright 2025 Rivos, Inc
> */
> +
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> @@ -11,10 +14,9 @@
> int __ret; \
> \
> if (user_mode(regs)) { \
> - __ret = get_user(insn, (type __user *) insn_addr); \
> + __ret = copy_from_user_nofault(&insn, (const type __user *) insn_addr, sizeof(type)); \
> } else { \
> - insn = *(type *)insn_addr; \
> - __ret = 0; \
> + __ret = copy_from_kernel_nofault(&insn, (const type *) insn_addr, sizeof(type)); \
> } \
Hi Jesse,
This can not be used for misaligned accesses handling. As pointed out by
Samuel in a previous misaligned access handling patch, using the
no_fault() version would lead to access failure if the user memory is
swapped out. For that reason it was swapped from the no_fault() version
to the standard version.
Thanks,
Clément
> \
> __ret; \