1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Two vsmmu impl_ops cleanups
  4. View patch

[PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not bother impl_ops if IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3

Nicolin Chen posted 2 patches 2 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not bother impl_ops if IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3
Posted by Nicolin Chen 2 months, 2 weeks ago 
When viommu type is IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3, always return or init the
standard struct arm_vsmmu, instead of going through impl_ops that must have
its own viommu type than the standard IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3.

Given that arm_vsmmu_init() is called after arm_smmu_get_viommu_size(), any
unsupported viommu->type must be a corruption. And it must be a driver bug
that its vsmmu_size and vsmmu_init ops aren't paired. Warn these two cases.

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 .../arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c     | 24 ++++++++++---------
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c   | 14 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
index d9bea8f1f636..c034d6c5468f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
@@ -420,14 +420,13 @@ size_t arm_smmu_get_viommu_size(struct device *dev,
 	    !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_S2FWB))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (smmu->impl_ops && smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_size &&
-	    viommu_type == smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_type)
-		return smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_size;
+	if (viommu_type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3)
+		return VIOMMU_STRUCT_SIZE(struct arm_vsmmu, core);
 
-	if (viommu_type != IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3)
+	if (!smmu->impl_ops || !smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_size ||
+	    viommu_type != smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_type)
 		return 0;
-
-	return VIOMMU_STRUCT_SIZE(struct arm_vsmmu, core);
+	return smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_size;
 }
 
 int arm_vsmmu_init(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
@@ -447,12 +446,15 @@ int arm_vsmmu_init(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
 	/* FIXME Move VMID allocation from the S2 domain allocation to here */
 	vsmmu->vmid = s2_parent->s2_cfg.vmid;
 
-	if (smmu->impl_ops && smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_init &&
-	    viommu->type == smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_type)
-		return smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_init(vsmmu, user_data);
+	if (viommu->type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3) {
+		viommu->ops = &arm_vsmmu_ops;
+		return 0;
+	}
 
-	viommu->ops = &arm_vsmmu_ops;
-	return 0;
+	/* Unsupported type was rejected in arm_smmu_get_viommu_size() */
+	if (WARN_ON(viommu->type != smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_type))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	return smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_init(vsmmu, user_data);
 }
 
 int arm_vmaster_report_event(struct arm_smmu_vmaster *vmaster, u64 *evt)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 181d07bc1a9d..dfe7f40fac35 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -4703,6 +4703,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_impl_remove(void *data)
 static struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
 	struct arm_smmu_device *new_smmu = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+	const struct arm_smmu_impl_ops *ops;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (smmu->impl_dev && (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_TEGRA241_CMDQV))
@@ -4713,11 +4714,24 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 	if (IS_ERR(new_smmu))
 		return new_smmu;
 
+	ops = new_smmu->impl_ops;
+	if (ops) {
+		/* vsmmu_size and vsmmu_init ops must be paired */
+		if (WARN_ON(!ops->vsmmu_size ^ !ops->vsmmu_init)) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_remove;
+		}
+	}
+
 	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(new_smmu->dev, arm_smmu_impl_remove,
 				       new_smmu);
 	if (ret)
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	return new_smmu;
+
+err_remove:
+	arm_smmu_impl_remove(new_smmu);
+	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
 
 static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not bother impl_ops if IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3
Posted by Will Deacon 2 months, 2 weeks ago 
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 12:12:35PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> When viommu type is IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3, always return or init the
> standard struct arm_vsmmu, instead of going through impl_ops that must have
> its own viommu type than the standard IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3.
> 
> Given that arm_vsmmu_init() is called after arm_smmu_get_viommu_size(), any
> unsupported viommu->type must be a corruption. And it must be a driver bug
> that its vsmmu_size and vsmmu_init ops aren't paired. Warn these two cases.
> 
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  .../arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c     | 24 ++++++++++---------
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c   | 14 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Cheers for the quick respin.

> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 181d07bc1a9d..dfe7f40fac35 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -4703,6 +4703,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_impl_remove(void *data)
>  static struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *new_smmu = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +	const struct arm_smmu_impl_ops *ops;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (smmu->impl_dev && (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_TEGRA241_CMDQV))
> @@ -4713,11 +4714,24 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  	if (IS_ERR(new_smmu))
>  		return new_smmu;
>  
> +	ops = new_smmu->impl_ops;
> +	if (ops) {
> +		/* vsmmu_size and vsmmu_init ops must be paired */
> +		if (WARN_ON(!ops->vsmmu_size ^ !ops->vsmmu_init)) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err_remove;
> +		}

I suppose that could be != instead of ^ to avoid mixing up logical and
arithmetic operators, but it does the trick either way so:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Will
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not bother impl_ops if IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3
Posted by Nicolin Chen 2 months, 2 weeks ago 
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 08:23:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 12:12:35PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > +	ops = new_smmu->impl_ops;
> > +	if (ops) {
> > +		/* vsmmu_size and vsmmu_init ops must be paired */
> > +		if (WARN_ON(!ops->vsmmu_size ^ !ops->vsmmu_init)) {
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> > +			goto err_remove;
> > +		}
> 
> I suppose that could be != instead of ^ to avoid mixing up logical and
> arithmetic operators, but it does the trick either way so:
> 
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Ah, it only compares one bit, so I think "!=" would be nicer.

Will quickly respin a v3.

Thanks
Nicolin

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.