Make sure to drop the reference to the pwrctrl device taken by
of_find_device_by_node() when registering a PCI device.
Fixes: b458ff7e8176 ("PCI/pwrctl: Ensure that pwrctl drivers are probed before PCI client drivers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.13
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/bus.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
index 69048869ef1c..0394a9c77b38 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
@@ -362,11 +362,15 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
* before PCI client drivers.
*/
pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dn);
- if (pdev && of_pci_supply_present(dn)) {
- if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev,
- DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER))
- pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n",
- pdev->name);
+ if (pdev) {
+ if (of_pci_supply_present(dn)) {
+ if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev,
+ DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) {
+ pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n",
+ pdev->name);
+ }
+ }
+ put_device(&pdev->dev);
}
if (!dn || of_device_is_available(dn))
--
2.49.1
…
> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> @@ -362,11 +362,15 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
…
> + if (of_pci_supply_present(dn)) {
> + if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev,
> + DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) {
> + pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n",
> + pdev->name);
> + }
> + }
…
How do you think about to reconsider the usage of any curly brackets
once more?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v6.16-rc7#n197
Regards,
Markus
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:36:07 +0200
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> wrote:
> Make sure to drop the reference to the pwrctrl device taken by
> of_find_device_by_node() when registering a PCI device.
>
> Fixes: b458ff7e8176 ("PCI/pwrctl: Ensure that pwrctl drivers are probed before PCI client drivers")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.13
> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Hi Johan,
Perhaps time for
DEFINE_FREE(put_pdev, struct platform_device *, if (_T) put_device(&_T->dev));
then...
> ---
> drivers/pci/bus.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> index 69048869ef1c..0394a9c77b38 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> @@ -362,11 +362,15 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> * before PCI client drivers.
> */
> pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dn);
> - if (pdev && of_pci_supply_present(dn)) {
> - if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev,
> - DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER))
> - pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n",
> - pdev->name);
struct platform_device *pdev __free(put_pdev) =
of_find_device_by_node(dn);
> + if (pdev) {
> + if (of_pci_supply_present(dn)) {
> + if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev,
> + DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) {
> + pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n",
> + pdev->name);
> + }
> + }
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
and no need for any explicit put.
We already do this extensively in some subsystems (e.g. CXL) and it
greatly simplifies code.
> }
>
> if (!dn || of_device_is_available(dn))
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 11:05:26AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:36:07 +0200
> Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> wrote:
> Perhaps time for
> DEFINE_FREE(put_pdev, struct platform_device *, if (_T) put_device(&_T->dev));
>
> then...
>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/bus.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > index 69048869ef1c..0394a9c77b38 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > @@ -362,11 +362,15 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > * before PCI client drivers.
> > */
> > pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dn);
> > - if (pdev && of_pci_supply_present(dn)) {
> > - if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev,
> > - DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER))
> > - pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n",
> > - pdev->name);
>
> struct platform_device *pdev __free(put_pdev) =
> of_find_device_by_node(dn);
> > + if (pdev) {
> > + if (of_pci_supply_present(dn)) {
> > + if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev,
> > + DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) {
> > + pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n",
> > + pdev->name);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + put_device(&pdev->dev);
>
> and no need for any explicit put.
>
> We already do this extensively in some subsystems (e.g. CXL) and it
> greatly simplifies code.
No, I'm no fan of those kind of changes which I find leads to less
readable code (e.g. with those in-code declarations).
Johan
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.