Make sure to drop the reference to the pwrctrl device taken by
of_find_device_by_node() when registering a PCI device.
Fixes: b458ff7e8176 ("PCI/pwrctl: Ensure that pwrctl drivers are probed before PCI client drivers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.13
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/bus.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
index 69048869ef1c..0394a9c77b38 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
@@ -362,11 +362,15 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
* before PCI client drivers.
*/
pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dn);
- if (pdev && of_pci_supply_present(dn)) {
- if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev,
- DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER))
- pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n",
- pdev->name);
+ if (pdev) {
+ if (of_pci_supply_present(dn)) {
+ if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev,
+ DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) {
+ pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n",
+ pdev->name);
+ }
+ }
+ put_device(&pdev->dev);
}
if (!dn || of_device_is_available(dn))
--
2.49.1
… > +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c > @@ -362,11 +362,15 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) … > + if (of_pci_supply_present(dn)) { > + if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev, > + DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) { > + pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n", > + pdev->name); > + } > + } … How do you think about to reconsider the usage of any curly brackets once more? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v6.16-rc7#n197 Regards, Markus
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:36:07 +0200 Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> wrote: > Make sure to drop the reference to the pwrctrl device taken by > of_find_device_by_node() when registering a PCI device. > > Fixes: b458ff7e8176 ("PCI/pwrctl: Ensure that pwrctl drivers are probed before PCI client drivers") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.13 > Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> Hi Johan, Perhaps time for DEFINE_FREE(put_pdev, struct platform_device *, if (_T) put_device(&_T->dev)); then... > --- > drivers/pci/bus.c | 14 +++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c > index 69048869ef1c..0394a9c77b38 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c > @@ -362,11 +362,15 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) > * before PCI client drivers. > */ > pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dn); > - if (pdev && of_pci_supply_present(dn)) { > - if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev, > - DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) > - pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n", > - pdev->name); struct platform_device *pdev __free(put_pdev) = of_find_device_by_node(dn); > + if (pdev) { > + if (of_pci_supply_present(dn)) { > + if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev, > + DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) { > + pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n", > + pdev->name); > + } > + } > + put_device(&pdev->dev); and no need for any explicit put. We already do this extensively in some subsystems (e.g. CXL) and it greatly simplifies code. > } > > if (!dn || of_device_is_available(dn))
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 11:05:26AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:36:07 +0200 > Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> wrote: > Perhaps time for > DEFINE_FREE(put_pdev, struct platform_device *, if (_T) put_device(&_T->dev)); > > then... > > > --- > > drivers/pci/bus.c | 14 +++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c > > index 69048869ef1c..0394a9c77b38 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c > > @@ -362,11 +362,15 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) > > * before PCI client drivers. > > */ > > pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dn); > > - if (pdev && of_pci_supply_present(dn)) { > > - if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev, > > - DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) > > - pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n", > > - pdev->name); > > struct platform_device *pdev __free(put_pdev) = > of_find_device_by_node(dn); > > + if (pdev) { > > + if (of_pci_supply_present(dn)) { > > + if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev, > > + DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER)) { > > + pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link to power control device %s\n", > > + pdev->name); > > + } > > + } > > + put_device(&pdev->dev); > > and no need for any explicit put. > > We already do this extensively in some subsystems (e.g. CXL) and it > greatly simplifies code. No, I'm no fan of those kind of changes which I find leads to less readable code (e.g. with those in-code declarations). Johan
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.