Hi Raphael,
Thank you for this patch.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:15:32PM +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
> Return value for DMA allocation was not checked. Check it and return
> error code in case of failing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
> index 5e9332df21df0db30f10b7a6f5a41cba85c4f7ae..42f21ab91957b38cb9aef012b6ee7f4ae1683edf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
> @@ -234,8 +234,11 @@ static int sti_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> struct device_node *child_np;
> struct component_match *match = NULL;
> + int ret;
>
> - dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>
>
> --
> 2.50.1
>
Acked-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@foss.st.com>
Best regards
Alain