arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410.dtsi | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 18 +-- 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
This serie aims to rework the display-subsystem node, which was
previously included directly within the SoC node. This was wrong
because it is an abstraction and describes how IPs behave together, not
what the hardware is. Instead, extract display-subsystem outside of the
SoC node, and let IPs describe their connections. Doing so helps the
readability, and eases the understanding of the hardware.
Several nodes have been renamed to stick to the generic names defined in
the device-tree specification.
This series depends on another sent a few days ago. It is not critical
though, since not having it only triggers warnings when building
deprecated device-trees. Please see link below.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250714-sti-rework-v2-0-f4274920858b@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com>
---
Raphael Gallais-Pou (4):
drm/sti: check dma_set_coherent_mask return value
drm/sti: make use of drm_of_component_probe
ARM: dts: sti: extract display subsystem out of soc
ARM: dts: sti: remove useless cells fields
arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410.dtsi | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 18 +--
2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: b9a572f471993d3e8bf874fcb57f331d66650440
change-id: 20250401-sti-rework-b009551a362c
Best regards,
--
Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com>
Le 17/07/2025 à 21:15, Raphael Gallais-Pou a écrit : > This serie aims to rework the display-subsystem node, which was > previously included directly within the SoC node. This was wrong > because it is an abstraction and describes how IPs behave together, not > what the hardware is. Instead, extract display-subsystem outside of the > SoC node, and let IPs describe their connections. Doing so helps the > readability, and eases the understanding of the hardware. > > Several nodes have been renamed to stick to the generic names defined in > the device-tree specification. > > This series depends on another sent a few days ago. It is not critical > though, since not having it only triggers warnings when building > deprecated device-trees. Please see link below. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250714-sti-rework-v2-0-f4274920858b@gmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com> > --- > Raphael Gallais-Pou (4): > drm/sti: check dma_set_coherent_mask return value > drm/sti: make use of drm_of_component_probe > ARM: dts: sti: extract display subsystem out of soc > ARM: dts: sti: remove useless cells fields > Hi, @Patrice Would you agree to make the device-tree patches go through drm-misc instead of your tree ? So that the breaking change lands in -next in the same time as the driver changes. I will send another series to convert display subsystem bindings to DT schema as soon as the series is merged. @Alain Do you prefer to merge it yourself or you rather let me do it ? Best regards, Raphaël> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410.dtsi | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 18 +-- > 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: b9a572f471993d3e8bf874fcb57f331d66650440 > change-id: 20250401-sti-rework-b009551a362c > > Best regards,
Hi Raphaël, On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Raphaël Gallais-Pou wrote: (...) > @Alain > Do you prefer to merge it yourself or you rather let me do it ? Please go ahead, you can merge it. Thanks. Alain > > Best regards, > Raphaël> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410.dtsi | 316 > ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 18 +-- > > 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > > --- > > base-commit: b9a572f471993d3e8bf874fcb57f331d66650440 > > change-id: 20250401-sti-rework-b009551a362c > > > > Best regards, >
On 9/17/25 00:03, Raphaël Gallais-Pou wrote: > > > Le 17/07/2025 à 21:15, Raphael Gallais-Pou a écrit : >> This serie aims to rework the display-subsystem node, which was >> previously included directly within the SoC node. This was wrong >> because it is an abstraction and describes how IPs behave together, not >> what the hardware is. Instead, extract display-subsystem outside of the >> SoC node, and let IPs describe their connections. Doing so helps the >> readability, and eases the understanding of the hardware. >> >> Several nodes have been renamed to stick to the generic names defined in >> the device-tree specification. >> >> This series depends on another sent a few days ago. It is not critical >> though, since not having it only triggers warnings when building >> deprecated device-trees. Please see link below. >> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250714-sti-rework-v2-0-f4274920858b@gmail.com >> >> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com> >> --- >> Raphael Gallais-Pou (4): >> drm/sti: check dma_set_coherent_mask return value >> drm/sti: make use of drm_of_component_probe >> ARM: dts: sti: extract display subsystem out of soc >> ARM: dts: sti: remove useless cells fields >> > Hi, > > @Patrice > Would you agree to make the device-tree patches go through drm-misc instead of your tree ? So that the breaking change lands in -next in the same time as the driver changes. > Hi Raphael Yes of course. Thanks Patrice > I will send another series to convert display subsystem bindings to DT schema as soon as the series is merged. > > @Alain > Do you prefer to merge it yourself or you rather let me do it ? > > Best regards, > Raphaël> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410.dtsi | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- >> drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 18 +-- >> 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) >> --- >> base-commit: b9a572f471993d3e8bf874fcb57f331d66650440 >> change-id: 20250401-sti-rework-b009551a362c >> >> Best regards, >
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 21:15:31 +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote: > This serie aims to rework the display-subsystem node, which was > previously included directly within the SoC node. This was wrong > because it is an abstraction and describes how IPs behave together, not > what the hardware is. Instead, extract display-subsystem outside of the > SoC node, and let IPs describe their connections. Doing so helps the > readability, and eases the understanding of the hardware. > > Several nodes have been renamed to stick to the generic names defined in > the device-tree specification. > > This series depends on another sent a few days ago. It is not critical > though, since not having it only triggers warnings when building > deprecated device-trees. Please see link below. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250714-sti-rework-v2-0-f4274920858b@gmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com> > --- > Raphael Gallais-Pou (4): > drm/sti: check dma_set_coherent_mask return value > drm/sti: make use of drm_of_component_probe > ARM: dts: sti: extract display subsystem out of soc > ARM: dts: sti: remove useless cells fields > > arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410.dtsi | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 18 +-- > 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: b9a572f471993d3e8bf874fcb57f331d66650440 > change-id: 20250401-sti-rework-b009551a362c > > Best regards, > -- > Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@gmail.com> > > > My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this series. Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply unless the platform maintainer has comments. If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade This patch series was applied (using b4) to base: Base: base-commit b9a572f471993d3e8bf874fcb57f331d66650440 not known, ignoring Base: attempting to guess base-commit... Base: tags/v6.16-rc1-11-g2436e190bbdd (exact match) If this is not the correct base, please add 'base-commit' tag (or use b4 which does this automatically) New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm/boot/dts/st/' for 20250717-sti-rework-v1-0-46d516fb1ebb@gmail.com: arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2120.dtb: soc (simple-bus): sti-display-subsystem@0: 'anyOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: 'reg' is a required property 'ranges' is a required property from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/simple-bus.yaml# arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2120.dtb: /soc/display-controller@9d11000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-compositor'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2120.dtb: /soc/encoder@8d08000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-tvout'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2120.dtb: encoder@8d08000 (st,stih407-tvout): 'anyOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: 'clocks' is a required property '#clock-cells' is a required property from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/clock.yaml# arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2120.dtb: /soc/hdmi@8d04000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-hdmi'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2260.dtb: /soc/display-controller@9d11000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-compositor'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2120.dtb: /soc/analog@8d02000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-hda'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2120.dtb: /soc/plane@9c00000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-hqvdp'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2260.dtb: /soc/encoder@8d08000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-tvout'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2260.dtb: encoder@8d08000 (st,stih407-tvout): 'anyOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: 'clocks' is a required property '#clock-cells' is a required property from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/clock.yaml# arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2260.dtb: /soc/hdmi@8d04000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-hdmi'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2260.dtb: /soc/analog@8d02000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-hda'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2260.dtb: /soc/plane@9c00000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,stih407-hqvdp'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2120.dtb: /display-subsystem: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,sti-display-subsystem'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2120.dtb: display-subsystem (st,sti-display-subsystem): 'anyOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: 'clocks' is a required property '#clock-cells' is a required property from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/clock.yaml# arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2260.dtb: /display-subsystem: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['st,sti-display-subsystem'] arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stih410-b2260.dtb: display-subsystem (st,sti-display-subsystem): 'anyOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: 'clocks' is a required property '#clock-cells' is a required property from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/clock.yaml#
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.