[PATCH 1/2] rust: alloc: specify the minimum alignment of each allocator

Alice Ryhl posted 2 patches 2 months, 3 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 1/2] rust: alloc: specify the minimum alignment of each allocator
Posted by Alice Ryhl 2 months, 3 weeks ago
The kernel's allocators sometimes provide a higher alignment than the
end-user requested, so add a new constant on the Allocator trait to let
the allocator specify what its minimum guaranteed alignment is.

This allows the ForeignOwnable trait to provide a more accurate value of
FOREIGN_ALIGN when using a pointer type such as Box, which will be
useful with certain collections such as XArray that store its own data
in the low bits of pointers.

Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
---
 rust/kernel/alloc.rs           | 8 ++++++++
 rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs | 8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
index a2c49e5494d334bfde67328464dafcdb31052947..c12753a5fb1c7423a4063553674b537a775c860e 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
@@ -137,6 +137,14 @@ pub mod flags {
 /// - Implementers must ensure that all trait functions abide by the guarantees documented in the
 ///   `# Guarantees` sections.
 pub unsafe trait Allocator {
+    /// The minimum alignment satisfied by all allocations from this allocator.
+    ///
+    /// # Guarantees
+    ///
+    /// Any pointer allocated by this allocator must be aligned to `MIN_ALIGN` even if the
+    /// requested layout has a smaller alignment.
+    const MIN_ALIGN: usize;
+
     /// Allocate memory based on `layout` and `flags`.
     ///
     /// On success, returns a buffer represented as `NonNull<[u8]>` that satisfies the layout
diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs
index aa2dfa9dca4c309e5a9eafc7da6a8a9bd7b54b11..25fc9f9ae3b4e471a08d77130b374bd1397f7384 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
 use crate::bindings;
 use crate::pr_warn;
 
+const ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN: usize = bindings::ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN as usize;
+
 /// The contiguous kernel allocator.
 ///
 /// `Kmalloc` is typically used for physically contiguous allocations up to page size, but also
@@ -128,6 +130,8 @@ unsafe fn call(
 // - passing a pointer to a valid memory allocation is OK,
 // - `realloc` satisfies the guarantees, since `ReallocFunc::call` has the same.
 unsafe impl Allocator for Kmalloc {
+    const MIN_ALIGN: usize = ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN;
+
     #[inline]
     unsafe fn realloc(
         ptr: Option<NonNull<u8>>,
@@ -145,6 +149,8 @@ unsafe fn realloc(
 // - passing a pointer to a valid memory allocation is OK,
 // - `realloc` satisfies the guarantees, since `ReallocFunc::call` has the same.
 unsafe impl Allocator for Vmalloc {
+    const MIN_ALIGN: usize = kernel::page::PAGE_SIZE;
+
     #[inline]
     unsafe fn realloc(
         ptr: Option<NonNull<u8>>,
@@ -169,6 +175,8 @@ unsafe fn realloc(
 // - passing a pointer to a valid memory allocation is OK,
 // - `realloc` satisfies the guarantees, since `ReallocFunc::call` has the same.
 unsafe impl Allocator for KVmalloc {
+    const MIN_ALIGN: usize = ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN;
+
     #[inline]
     unsafe fn realloc(
         ptr: Option<NonNull<u8>>,

-- 
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: alloc: specify the minimum alignment of each allocator
Posted by Benno Lossin 2 months, 3 weeks ago
On Tue Jul 15, 2025 at 3:46 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> The kernel's allocators sometimes provide a higher alignment than the
> end-user requested, so add a new constant on the Allocator trait to let
> the allocator specify what its minimum guaranteed alignment is.
>
> This allows the ForeignOwnable trait to provide a more accurate value of
> FOREIGN_ALIGN when using a pointer type such as Box, which will be
> useful with certain collections such as XArray that store its own data
> in the low bits of pointers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>

With the wording changed according to Danilo's suggestion:

Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>

---
Cheers,
Benno

> ---
>  rust/kernel/alloc.rs           | 8 ++++++++
>  rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: alloc: specify the minimum alignment of each allocator
Posted by Danilo Krummrich 2 months, 3 weeks ago
On Tue Jul 15, 2025 at 3:46 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
> index a2c49e5494d334bfde67328464dafcdb31052947..c12753a5fb1c7423a4063553674b537a775c860e 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
> @@ -137,6 +137,14 @@ pub mod flags {
>  /// - Implementers must ensure that all trait functions abide by the guarantees documented in the
>  ///   `# Guarantees` sections.
>  pub unsafe trait Allocator {
> +    /// The minimum alignment satisfied by all allocations from this allocator.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Guarantees
> +    ///
> +    /// Any pointer allocated by this allocator must be aligned to `MIN_ALIGN` even if the
> +    /// requested layout has a smaller alignment.

I'd say "is guaranteed to be aligned to" instead, "must be" reads like a
requirement.

Speaking of which, I think this also needs to be expressed as a safety
requirement of the Allocator trait itself, which the specific allocator
implementations need to justify.

> +    const MIN_ALIGN: usize;
> +
>      /// Allocate memory based on `layout` and `flags`.
>      ///
>      /// On success, returns a buffer represented as `NonNull<[u8]>` that satisfies the layout
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs
> index aa2dfa9dca4c309e5a9eafc7da6a8a9bd7b54b11..25fc9f9ae3b4e471a08d77130b374bd1397f7384 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>  use crate::bindings;
>  use crate::pr_warn;
>  
> +const ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN: usize = bindings::ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN as usize;
> +
>  /// The contiguous kernel allocator.
>  ///
>  /// `Kmalloc` is typically used for physically contiguous allocations up to page size, but also
> @@ -128,6 +130,8 @@ unsafe fn call(
>  // - passing a pointer to a valid memory allocation is OK,
>  // - `realloc` satisfies the guarantees, since `ReallocFunc::call` has the same.
>  unsafe impl Allocator for Kmalloc {
> +    const MIN_ALIGN: usize = ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN;
> +
>      #[inline]
>      unsafe fn realloc(
>          ptr: Option<NonNull<u8>>,
> @@ -145,6 +149,8 @@ unsafe fn realloc(
>  // - passing a pointer to a valid memory allocation is OK,
>  // - `realloc` satisfies the guarantees, since `ReallocFunc::call` has the same.
>  unsafe impl Allocator for Vmalloc {
> +    const MIN_ALIGN: usize = kernel::page::PAGE_SIZE;
> +
>      #[inline]
>      unsafe fn realloc(
>          ptr: Option<NonNull<u8>>,
> @@ -169,6 +175,8 @@ unsafe fn realloc(
>  // - passing a pointer to a valid memory allocation is OK,
>  // - `realloc` satisfies the guarantees, since `ReallocFunc::call` has the same.
>  unsafe impl Allocator for KVmalloc {
> +    const MIN_ALIGN: usize = ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN;
> +
>      #[inline]
>      unsafe fn realloc(
>          ptr: Option<NonNull<u8>>,
Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: alloc: specify the minimum alignment of each allocator
Posted by Alice Ryhl 2 months, 3 weeks ago
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 4:05 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue Jul 15, 2025 at 3:46 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
> > index a2c49e5494d334bfde67328464dafcdb31052947..c12753a5fb1c7423a4063553674b537a775c860e 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
> > @@ -137,6 +137,14 @@ pub mod flags {
> >  /// - Implementers must ensure that all trait functions abide by the guarantees documented in the
> >  ///   `# Guarantees` sections.
> >  pub unsafe trait Allocator {
> > +    /// The minimum alignment satisfied by all allocations from this allocator.
> > +    ///
> > +    /// # Guarantees
> > +    ///
> > +    /// Any pointer allocated by this allocator must be aligned to `MIN_ALIGN` even if the
> > +    /// requested layout has a smaller alignment.
>
> I'd say "is guaranteed to be aligned to" instead, "must be" reads like a
> requirement.

Yes I agree that sounds better.

> Speaking of which, I think this also needs to be expressed as a safety
> requirement of the Allocator trait itself, which the specific allocator
> implementations need to justify.

The trait safety requirements already says that the implementation
must provide the guarantee listed on each item in the trait.

Alice
Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: alloc: specify the minimum alignment of each allocator
Posted by Danilo Krummrich 2 months, 3 weeks ago
On Tue Jul 15, 2025 at 4:35 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 4:05 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue Jul 15, 2025 at 3:46 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
>> > index a2c49e5494d334bfde67328464dafcdb31052947..c12753a5fb1c7423a4063553674b537a775c860e 100644
>> > --- a/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
>> > +++ b/rust/kernel/alloc.rs
>> > @@ -137,6 +137,14 @@ pub mod flags {
>> >  /// - Implementers must ensure that all trait functions abide by the guarantees documented in the
>> >  ///   `# Guarantees` sections.
>> >  pub unsafe trait Allocator {
>> > +    /// The minimum alignment satisfied by all allocations from this allocator.
>> > +    ///
>> > +    /// # Guarantees
>> > +    ///
>> > +    /// Any pointer allocated by this allocator must be aligned to `MIN_ALIGN` even if the
>> > +    /// requested layout has a smaller alignment.
>>
>> I'd say "is guaranteed to be aligned to" instead, "must be" reads like a
>> requirement.
>
> Yes I agree that sounds better.
>
>> Speaking of which, I think this also needs to be expressed as a safety
>> requirement of the Allocator trait itself, which the specific allocator
>> implementations need to justify.
>
> The trait safety requirements already says that the implementation
> must provide the guarantee listed on each item in the trait.

Oh, indeed, that's fine then. :)