tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Specify details in logs of failed cases
Signed-off-by: Harshal <embedkari167@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- revert back to exit() instead of die() to avoid modifying system behaviour
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c7c071ed-6a4e-4a9c-ba9d-c745fd42c22f@linuxfoundation.org/
tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c
index 04757dc7e546..5b0032498ede 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void trigger_fw(const char *fw_name, const char *sys_path)
fd = open(sys_path, O_WRONLY);
if (fd < 0)
- die("open failed: %s\n",
+ die("open of sys_path failed: %s\n",
strerror(errno));
if (write(fd, fw_name, strlen(fw_name)) != strlen(fw_name))
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
@@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ static void setup_fw(const char *fw_path)
fd = open(fw_path, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0600);
if (fd < 0)
- die("open failed: %s\n",
+ die("open of firmware file failed: %s\n",
strerror(errno));
if (write(fd, fw, sizeof(fw) -1) != sizeof(fw) -1)
- die("write failed: %s\n",
+ die("write to firmware file failed: %s\n",
strerror(errno));
close(fd);
}
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static bool test_fw_in_ns(const char *fw_name, const char *sys_path, bool block_
if (block_fw_in_parent_ns)
if (mount("test", "/lib/firmware", "tmpfs", MS_RDONLY, NULL) == -1)
- die("blocking firmware in parent ns failed\n");
+ die("blocking firmware in parent namespace failed\n");
child = fork();
if (child == -1) {
@@ -99,11 +99,11 @@ static bool test_fw_in_ns(const char *fw_name, const char *sys_path, bool block_
strerror(errno));
}
if (mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_SLAVE|MS_REC, NULL) == -1)
- die("remount root in child ns failed\n");
+ die("remount root in child namespace failed\n");
if (!block_fw_in_parent_ns) {
if (mount("test", "/lib/firmware", "tmpfs", MS_RDONLY, NULL) == -1)
- die("blocking firmware in child ns failed\n");
+ die("blocking firmware in child namespace failed\n");
} else
umount("/lib/firmware");
@@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
die("error: failed to build full fw_path\n");
setup_fw(fw_path);
-
setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IONBF, 0);
+
/* Positive case: firmware in PID1 mount namespace */
printf("Testing with firmware in parent namespace (assumed to be same file system as PID1)\n");
if (!test_fw_in_ns(fw_name, sys_path, false))
--
2.43.0
On 7/14/25 15:26, Harshal wrote: > Specify details in logs of failed cases How about changing the above to: Improve error messages adding details on failuires > > Signed-off-by: Harshal <embedkari167@gmail.com> > --- > v2: > - revert back to exit() instead of die() to avoid modifying system behaviour > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c7c071ed-6a4e-4a9c-ba9d-c745fd42c22f@linuxfoundation.org/ > tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c > index 04757dc7e546..5b0032498ede 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void trigger_fw(const char *fw_name, const char *sys_path) > > fd = open(sys_path, O_WRONLY); > if (fd < 0) > - die("open failed: %s\n", > + die("open of sys_path failed: %s\n", Why not just use sys_path as a input parameter to die()? > strerror(errno)); > if (write(fd, fw_name, strlen(fw_name)) != strlen(fw_name)) > exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > @@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ static void setup_fw(const char *fw_path) > > fd = open(fw_path, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0600); > if (fd < 0) > - die("open failed: %s\n", > + die("open of firmware file failed: %s\n", Why not just use fw_path as a input parameter to die()? > strerror(errno)); > if (write(fd, fw, sizeof(fw) -1) != sizeof(fw) -1) > - die("write failed: %s\n", > + die("write to firmware file failed: %s\n", Same here > strerror(errno)); > close(fd); > } > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static bool test_fw_in_ns(const char *fw_name, const char *sys_path, bool block_ > > if (block_fw_in_parent_ns) > if (mount("test", "/lib/firmware", "tmpfs", MS_RDONLY, NULL) == -1) > - die("blocking firmware in parent ns failed\n"); > + die("blocking firmware in parent namespace failed\n"); > > child = fork(); > if (child == -1) { > @@ -99,11 +99,11 @@ static bool test_fw_in_ns(const char *fw_name, const char *sys_path, bool block_ > strerror(errno)); > } > if (mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_SLAVE|MS_REC, NULL) == -1) > - die("remount root in child ns failed\n"); > + die("remount root in child namespace failed\n"); > > if (!block_fw_in_parent_ns) { > if (mount("test", "/lib/firmware", "tmpfs", MS_RDONLY, NULL) == -1) > - die("blocking firmware in child ns failed\n"); > + die("blocking firmware in child namespace failed\n"); > } else > umount("/lib/firmware"); > > @@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > die("error: failed to build full fw_path\n"); > > setup_fw(fw_path); > - Why did you remove this line? > setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IONBF, 0); > + Why is this line added > /* Positive case: firmware in PID1 mount namespace */ > printf("Testing with firmware in parent namespace (assumed to be same file system as PID1)\n"); > if (!test_fw_in_ns(fw_name, sys_path, false)) The rest looks good to me. thanks, -- Shuah
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 03:39:47PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 7/14/25 15:26, Harshal wrote: > > Specify details in logs of failed cases > > How about changing the above to: > > Improve error messages adding details on failuires Will change this in next patch > > fd = open(sys_path, O_WRONLY); > > if (fd < 0) > > - die("open failed: %s\n", > > + die("open of sys_path failed: %s\n", > > Why not just use sys_path as a input parameter to die()? Sure, that's great. Is there a way to test these changes ? > > @@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > die("error: failed to build full fw_path\n"); > > setup_fw(fw_path); > > - > > Why did you remove this line? > Will remove this change. > > setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IONBF, 0); > > + > > Why is this line added This too. Thanks, Harshal
On 7/20/25 12:21, Harshal Wadhwa wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 03:39:47PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 7/14/25 15:26, Harshal wrote: >>> Specify details in logs of failed cases >> >> How about changing the above to: >> >> Improve error messages adding details on failuires > Will change this in next patch > >>> fd = open(sys_path, O_WRONLY); >>> if (fd < 0) >>> - die("open failed: %s\n", >>> + die("open of sys_path failed: %s\n", >> >> Why not just use sys_path as a input parameter to die()? > Sure, that's great. Is there a way to test these changes ? The same way you tested your v2 patch? How did you test this patch? thanks, -- Shuah
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.