For the sake of the code readability and easier maintenance
factor out read and write sys_info handlers.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
lib/sys_info.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/sys_info.c b/lib/sys_info.c
index 7483b6e9b30b..32bf639c4de2 100644
--- a/lib/sys_info.c
+++ b/lib/sys_info.c
@@ -40,13 +40,52 @@ unsigned long sys_info_parse_param(char *str)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+static int sys_info_write_handler(struct ctl_table *table,
+ void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos,
+ unsigned long *si_bits_global)
+{
+ unsigned long si_bits;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = proc_dostring(table, 1, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ si_bits = sys_info_parse_param(table->data);
+
+ /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
+ WRITE_ONCE(*si_bits_global, si_bits);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sys_info_read_handler(struct ctl_table *table,
+ void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos,
+ unsigned long *si_bits_global)
+{
+ unsigned long si_bits;
+ unsigned int len = 0;
+ char *delim = "";
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
+ si_bits = READ_ONCE(*si_bits_global);
+
+ for_each_set_bit(i, &si_bits, ARRAY_SIZE(si_names)) {
+ len += scnprintf(table->data + len, table->maxlen - len,
+ "%s%s", delim, si_names[i]);
+ delim = ",";
+ }
+
+ return proc_dostring(table, 0, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+}
+
int sysctl_sys_info_handler(const struct ctl_table *ro_table, int write,
void *buffer, size_t *lenp,
loff_t *ppos)
{
struct ctl_table table;
unsigned long *si_bits_global;
- unsigned long si_bits;
unsigned int i;
size_t maxlen;
@@ -64,33 +103,10 @@ int sysctl_sys_info_handler(const struct ctl_table *ro_table, int write,
table.data = names;
table.maxlen = maxlen;
- if (write) {
- int ret;
-
- ret = proc_dostring(&table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- si_bits = sys_info_parse_param(names);
- /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
- WRITE_ONCE(*si_bits_global, si_bits);
- return 0;
- } else {
- /* for 'read' operation */
- unsigned int len = 0;
- char *delim = "";
-
- /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
- si_bits = READ_ONCE(*si_bits_global);
-
- for_each_set_bit(i, &si_bits, ARRAY_SIZE(si_names)) {
- len += scnprintf(names + len, maxlen - len,
- "%s%s", delim, si_names[i]);
- delim = ",";
- }
-
- return proc_dostring(&table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
- }
+ if (write)
+ return sys_info_write_handler(&table, buffer, lenp, ppos, si_bits_global);
+ else
+ return sys_info_read_handler(&table, buffer, lenp, ppos, si_bits_global);
}
#endif
--
2.47.2
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 12:51:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> For the sake of the code readability and easier maintenance
> factor out read and write sys_info handlers.
IIRC, I did implement separate 'write' handler, but chose not
to do that to save some common definition. I guess it's personal
preference, and I'm fine with either one.
Thanks,
Feng
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> lib/sys_info.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/sys_info.c b/lib/sys_info.c
> index 7483b6e9b30b..32bf639c4de2 100644
> --- a/lib/sys_info.c
> +++ b/lib/sys_info.c
> @@ -40,13 +40,52 @@ unsigned long sys_info_parse_param(char *str)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> +static int sys_info_write_handler(struct ctl_table *table,
> + void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos,
> + unsigned long *si_bits_global)
> +{
> + unsigned long si_bits;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = proc_dostring(table, 1, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + si_bits = sys_info_parse_param(table->data);
> +
> + /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
> + WRITE_ONCE(*si_bits_global, si_bits);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sys_info_read_handler(struct ctl_table *table,
> + void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos,
> + unsigned long *si_bits_global)
> +{
> + unsigned long si_bits;
> + unsigned int len = 0;
> + char *delim = "";
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
> + si_bits = READ_ONCE(*si_bits_global);
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &si_bits, ARRAY_SIZE(si_names)) {
> + len += scnprintf(table->data + len, table->maxlen - len,
> + "%s%s", delim, si_names[i]);
> + delim = ",";
> + }
> +
> + return proc_dostring(table, 0, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> +}
> +
> int sysctl_sys_info_handler(const struct ctl_table *ro_table, int write,
> void *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> loff_t *ppos)
> {
> struct ctl_table table;
> unsigned long *si_bits_global;
> - unsigned long si_bits;
> unsigned int i;
> size_t maxlen;
>
> @@ -64,33 +103,10 @@ int sysctl_sys_info_handler(const struct ctl_table *ro_table, int write,
> table.data = names;
> table.maxlen = maxlen;
>
> - if (write) {
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = proc_dostring(&table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - si_bits = sys_info_parse_param(names);
> - /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
> - WRITE_ONCE(*si_bits_global, si_bits);
> - return 0;
> - } else {
> - /* for 'read' operation */
> - unsigned int len = 0;
> - char *delim = "";
> -
> - /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
> - si_bits = READ_ONCE(*si_bits_global);
> -
> - for_each_set_bit(i, &si_bits, ARRAY_SIZE(si_names)) {
> - len += scnprintf(names + len, maxlen - len,
> - "%s%s", delim, si_names[i]);
> - delim = ",";
> - }
> -
> - return proc_dostring(&table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> - }
> + if (write)
> + return sys_info_write_handler(&table, buffer, lenp, ppos, si_bits_global);
> + else
> + return sys_info_read_handler(&table, buffer, lenp, ppos, si_bits_global);
> }
> #endif
>
> --
> 2.47.2
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:09:16PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 12:51:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > For the sake of the code readability and easier maintenance > > factor out read and write sys_info handlers. > > IIRC, I did implement separate 'write' handler, but chose not > to do that to save some common definition. I guess it's personal > preference, and I'm fine with either one. It looks better, in my opinion, to be three functions. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.