For the sake of the code readability and easier maintenance
factor out read and write sys_info handlers.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
lib/sys_info.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/sys_info.c b/lib/sys_info.c
index 7483b6e9b30b..32bf639c4de2 100644
--- a/lib/sys_info.c
+++ b/lib/sys_info.c
@@ -40,13 +40,52 @@ unsigned long sys_info_parse_param(char *str)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+static int sys_info_write_handler(struct ctl_table *table,
+ void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos,
+ unsigned long *si_bits_global)
+{
+ unsigned long si_bits;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = proc_dostring(table, 1, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ si_bits = sys_info_parse_param(table->data);
+
+ /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
+ WRITE_ONCE(*si_bits_global, si_bits);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sys_info_read_handler(struct ctl_table *table,
+ void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos,
+ unsigned long *si_bits_global)
+{
+ unsigned long si_bits;
+ unsigned int len = 0;
+ char *delim = "";
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
+ si_bits = READ_ONCE(*si_bits_global);
+
+ for_each_set_bit(i, &si_bits, ARRAY_SIZE(si_names)) {
+ len += scnprintf(table->data + len, table->maxlen - len,
+ "%s%s", delim, si_names[i]);
+ delim = ",";
+ }
+
+ return proc_dostring(table, 0, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+}
+
int sysctl_sys_info_handler(const struct ctl_table *ro_table, int write,
void *buffer, size_t *lenp,
loff_t *ppos)
{
struct ctl_table table;
unsigned long *si_bits_global;
- unsigned long si_bits;
unsigned int i;
size_t maxlen;
@@ -64,33 +103,10 @@ int sysctl_sys_info_handler(const struct ctl_table *ro_table, int write,
table.data = names;
table.maxlen = maxlen;
- if (write) {
- int ret;
-
- ret = proc_dostring(&table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- si_bits = sys_info_parse_param(names);
- /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
- WRITE_ONCE(*si_bits_global, si_bits);
- return 0;
- } else {
- /* for 'read' operation */
- unsigned int len = 0;
- char *delim = "";
-
- /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */
- si_bits = READ_ONCE(*si_bits_global);
-
- for_each_set_bit(i, &si_bits, ARRAY_SIZE(si_names)) {
- len += scnprintf(names + len, maxlen - len,
- "%s%s", delim, si_names[i]);
- delim = ",";
- }
-
- return proc_dostring(&table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
- }
+ if (write)
+ return sys_info_write_handler(&table, buffer, lenp, ppos, si_bits_global);
+ else
+ return sys_info_read_handler(&table, buffer, lenp, ppos, si_bits_global);
}
#endif
--
2.47.2
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 12:51:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > For the sake of the code readability and easier maintenance > factor out read and write sys_info handlers. IIRC, I did implement separate 'write' handler, but chose not to do that to save some common definition. I guess it's personal preference, and I'm fine with either one. Thanks, Feng > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > --- > lib/sys_info.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/sys_info.c b/lib/sys_info.c > index 7483b6e9b30b..32bf639c4de2 100644 > --- a/lib/sys_info.c > +++ b/lib/sys_info.c > @@ -40,13 +40,52 @@ unsigned long sys_info_parse_param(char *str) > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL > +static int sys_info_write_handler(struct ctl_table *table, > + void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos, > + unsigned long *si_bits_global) > +{ > + unsigned long si_bits; > + int ret; > + > + ret = proc_dostring(table, 1, buffer, lenp, ppos); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + si_bits = sys_info_parse_param(table->data); > + > + /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */ > + WRITE_ONCE(*si_bits_global, si_bits); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int sys_info_read_handler(struct ctl_table *table, > + void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos, > + unsigned long *si_bits_global) > +{ > + unsigned long si_bits; > + unsigned int len = 0; > + char *delim = ""; > + unsigned int i; > + > + /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */ > + si_bits = READ_ONCE(*si_bits_global); > + > + for_each_set_bit(i, &si_bits, ARRAY_SIZE(si_names)) { > + len += scnprintf(table->data + len, table->maxlen - len, > + "%s%s", delim, si_names[i]); > + delim = ","; > + } > + > + return proc_dostring(table, 0, buffer, lenp, ppos); > +} > + > int sysctl_sys_info_handler(const struct ctl_table *ro_table, int write, > void *buffer, size_t *lenp, > loff_t *ppos) > { > struct ctl_table table; > unsigned long *si_bits_global; > - unsigned long si_bits; > unsigned int i; > size_t maxlen; > > @@ -64,33 +103,10 @@ int sysctl_sys_info_handler(const struct ctl_table *ro_table, int write, > table.data = names; > table.maxlen = maxlen; > > - if (write) { > - int ret; > - > - ret = proc_dostring(&table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - > - si_bits = sys_info_parse_param(names); > - /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */ > - WRITE_ONCE(*si_bits_global, si_bits); > - return 0; > - } else { > - /* for 'read' operation */ > - unsigned int len = 0; > - char *delim = ""; > - > - /* The access to the global value is not synchronized. */ > - si_bits = READ_ONCE(*si_bits_global); > - > - for_each_set_bit(i, &si_bits, ARRAY_SIZE(si_names)) { > - len += scnprintf(names + len, maxlen - len, > - "%s%s", delim, si_names[i]); > - delim = ","; > - } > - > - return proc_dostring(&table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > - } > + if (write) > + return sys_info_write_handler(&table, buffer, lenp, ppos, si_bits_global); > + else > + return sys_info_read_handler(&table, buffer, lenp, ppos, si_bits_global); > } > #endif > > -- > 2.47.2
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:09:16PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 12:51:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > For the sake of the code readability and easier maintenance > > factor out read and write sys_info handlers. > > IIRC, I did implement separate 'write' handler, but chose not > to do that to save some common definition. I guess it's personal > preference, and I'm fine with either one. It looks better, in my opinion, to be three functions. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.